The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (TooMany2count, Southerntruck, Gray_Ghost, Ridgeback, GMCJammer51), 111 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,050
Posts1,055,751
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#896432 11/13/2012 11:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Looking at buying lowering springs 3" in back and 2" in front. My question is will I have to purchase new spindles or can I just buy the springs??? I was told that I don't and that I can still use the shocks that are on the truck!!

Thanks for input fellow Stovebolters!!

Last edited by markbanxs; 11/13/2012 12:08 PM.

Gotta love the Rust!!
The more rust the better!

Old Chevs, old Lanterns, Rust!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 841
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 841
i bet you can still use the old shocks if they are good. they seem to just damper movement and can function if compressed a little more. as far as coils go you hear different info from different people, but i thought 3" was ok with just coils. moore and you would have to buy spindles.

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
The stock shocks were designed not to bottom out when the suspension was setting on the bump stops. Therefore as long as you don't modify the rubber bump stops the shocks will work just fine.

Lowering springs more than 2" lower than stock on the front will provide very little suspension travel... that's when folks start cutting bump stops for more clearance, that's when you end up needing shorter shocks.

As the song goes "One thing leads to another"

Hope that helps! thumbs_up


In the Stovebolt Gallery ~~ "The Orange Crate" 1965 C10 SWB Step Side Build Thread

Inspired to be different. Different in a way of my own, not in a way that others strive.
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
The spindles I've seen lower 2-1/2" AND require switching to disc brakes. BUT, they don't change your geometry like lowering springs. I put 2" lowering springs on mine, front and rear, and use stock shocks...works good after replacing worn out ball joints.
I want an anti-sway bar next.

c


If you can't fix it with a hammer and screwdriver, you need a bigger hammer.
1965 Chevy C10

Moderated by  Hambone, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0