BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
8 members (GMCJammer51, IHPWR, DJHobbit'46Chevy, Danielbolt, Dragsix, RBs36, 2 invisible),
556
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,780 Posts1,039,296 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | |
#89410 03/28/2003 6:13 AM | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 | After reading the post about the 39 GMC and its battery question, it got me to thinking. Why did they make some trucks and cars with positive ground?? What is the advantage of this other than throwing sparks when jump starting it with out knowing the difference? Joe | | |
#89411 03/28/2003 2:14 PM | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 587 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 587 | The only reason for positive grounding that I have heard is that there is less battery corrosion with positive grounding, but I do not even know if that is true. Apparently it was a very common practice back then to put generator-equipped vehicles with positive grounding. | | |
#89412 03/28/2003 3:05 PM | Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 | the majority of the pos ground systems were fomoco, tho there was some Brit &/or Euro that way too - supossedly something to do w/ making spark plugs last longer, which may have been a problem back when. don't hold it to me, but methinks pos ground was F ords lawyers way to get around some GM patent. Bill | | |
#89413 03/28/2003 6:11 PM | Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 55 Member | Member Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 55 | All early Jags were positive ground. Doesn't power flow from neg to pos? Maybe the thought was to provide a more direct or controlled current carrying path to the potential point... | | |
#89414 03/28/2003 6:42 PM | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 198 Member | Member Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 198 | I don't know why the started off with pos grnd, but automakers switched to neg groung to try and slow down some of the body rusting problems. | | |
#89415 03/28/2003 11:12 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 481 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 481 | I had a 55 dodge truck that was also positive ground. | | |
#89416 03/28/2003 11:45 PM | Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 385 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 385 | Gobsow, you are correct that electrons flow from (-) to (+). I suspect that is the reason for the switch to negative ground, as the principles behind electrolytic rust removal should apply to an electron-rich chassis. However, the distance between theory and practice is sometimes measured in buckets of bondo. :p I'm curious if there is another benefit in maintaining a potential in the chassis, perhaps battery life is improved? Anyone who didn't fall asleep in Electrical Engineering 101 is welcome to jump in with corrections/clarifications.  | | |
#89417 03/29/2003 12:00 AM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 481 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 481 | Let the electrons flow  | | |
#89418 03/29/2003 5:00 AM | Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 45 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 45 | The issue seems to be that of electrolysis/corrosion.This may shed a little light on the subject. http://engr.smu.edu/~levine/ee8302/positiveground.pdf | | |
#89419 03/29/2003 12:26 PM | Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 85 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 85 | Maybe one reason the 1939 GMC trucks had Pos ground, was so they could sell them to the Brits thru Lend-Lease? My dad used to have a '59 Jag Mk IX -- that beast couldn't hold a charge. I learned why the English drink warm beer -- Lucas Refrigeration!
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292 just for GP
| | |
#89420 03/29/2003 6:26 PM | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 139 Member | Member Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 139 | Joe H, Mack trucks used to have positive too. Why, I don't know. But I do know it would smoke the diodes in a CB radio in a heart beat if ya forgot about the positive ground. Mike | | |
#89421 03/29/2003 9:32 PM | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 316 Member | Member Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 316 | Thermodyne64, Thanks for the link 
*** GMC ***
| | |
#89422 03/30/2003 2:14 AM | Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 45 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 45 | '248,anytime.  | | |
#89423 04/03/2003 5:12 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 124 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 124 | We had Positive Ground in the same context that the Germans had to drink warm beer. If any of you have ever had a vehicle with Lucas electric you will be able to relate. The two different systems are in part related to the two theories of electricity as mentioned above. In the end it really doesn't matter neither proved to be better than the other.
**** engineers liked the positive ground electrical systems and because they were the largest automaker during the early years, many smaller companies followed suit. In the late 1940' when GM became the largest auto manufacturer engineers at GM belived negative ground was best. Because they were in charge so to speak (sorry, I had to work something in) they led the way. In addition GM made many of the electrical compoents for the independents, so...the independents had little choice to to conform.
The important thing is that you do not install any modern solid state accessory designed for negative ground....into any positive ground system. The results will not be pretty....Randy | | |
#89424 04/04/2003 8:42 PM | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | One reason I was told was that since the earth is positive ground, some engineers wanted to keep vehicles the same. This is one subject we did not cover in electrical dymanics.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | |
#89425 04/04/2003 9:04 PM | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 11 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 11 | I think it's just because it's nicer to have a "positive" system than a "negative" system. http://www.positivepress.com/news/ Murph ...............___ _=======| :p \___ |(.....)_(O)____(....)c ...(O)...............(O) '49 GMC 3/4 | | |
#89426 04/05/2003 9:53 AM | Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,571 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,571 | As many of you know, my dad has a 1930 Fjord AA stakebed. According to the Model A guys, Fjord went to positive ground (I think some early Model Ts were negative ground, but I may be wrong there) due to the battery corrosion issue. After a while, the battery manufacturers started making better batteries, so it became a matter of preference. Eventually Chevy's negative ground system took over. My dad and I learned the hard way about the A's positive ground system - we killed an old POS battery charger when we hooked it up backwards. Like many things, there was a reason at one time, then it took 20+ years for everyone to get on the same page (6-volt GMC trucks, anyone?). | | |
| |