The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (GMCJammer51, IHPWR, DJHobbit'46Chevy, Danielbolt, Dragsix, RBs36, 2 invisible), 556 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,296
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#89410 03/28/2003 6:13 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
After reading the post about the 39 GMC and its battery question, it got me to thinking. Why did they make some trucks and cars with positive ground?? What is the advantage of this other than throwing sparks when jump starting it with out knowing the difference? Joe

#89411 03/28/2003 2:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 587
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 587
The only reason for positive grounding that I have heard is that there is less battery corrosion with positive grounding, but I do not even know if that is true. Apparently it was a very common practice back then to put generator-equipped vehicles with positive grounding.

#89412 03/28/2003 3:05 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,887
S
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
S Offline
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,887
the majority of the pos ground systems were fomoco, tho there was some Brit &/or Euro that way too - supossedly something to do w/ making spark plugs last longer, which may have been a problem back when.
don't hold it to me, but methinks pos ground was F ords lawyers way to get around some GM patent. grin

Bill


Moved over to the Passing Lane

"When we tug a single thing in nature we find it attached to the rest of the world" John Muir
"When we tug a single thing on an old truck, we find it falls off" me
Some TF series details & TF heater pics & Rust-a-holics Unanimous parking lot
#89413 03/28/2003 6:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 55
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 55
All early Jags were positive ground. Doesn't power flow from neg to pos? Maybe the thought was to provide a more direct or controlled current carrying path to the potential point...

#89414 03/28/2003 6:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 198
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 198
I don't know why the started off with pos grnd, but automakers switched to neg groung to try and slow down some of the body rusting problems.

#89415 03/28/2003 11:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 481
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 481
I had a 55 dodge truck that was also positive ground.

#89416 03/28/2003 11:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 385
H
'Bolter
'Bolter
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 385
Gobsow, you are correct that electrons flow from (-) to (+). I suspect that is the reason for the switch to negative ground, as the principles behind electrolytic rust removal should apply to an electron-rich chassis. However, the distance between theory and practice is sometimes measured in buckets of bondo. :p

I'm curious if there is another benefit in maintaining a potential in the chassis, perhaps battery life is improved? Anyone who didn't fall asleep in Electrical Engineering 101 is welcome to jump in with corrections/clarifications. smile


1955 First Series GMC 250 1-Ton Panel
In the Gallery
Mr. Hedgehog - Follow the build
If you can't laugh at yourself, I'll laugh at you.
#89417 03/29/2003 12:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 481
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 481
Let the electrons flow smile

#89418 03/29/2003 5:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45
The issue seems to be that of electrolysis/corrosion.This may shed a little light on the subject. http://engr.smu.edu/~levine/ee8302/positiveground.pdf

#89419 03/29/2003 12:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 85
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 85
Maybe one reason the 1939 GMC trucks had Pos ground, was so they could sell them to the Brits thru Lend-Lease? My dad used to have a '59 Jag Mk IX -- that beast couldn't hold a charge. I learned why the English drink warm beer -- Lucas Refrigeration!


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292 just for GP
#89420 03/29/2003 6:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 139
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 139
Joe H, Mack trucks used to have positive too. Why, I don't know. But I do know it would smoke the diodes in a CB radio in a heart beat if ya forgot about the positive ground. Mike

#89421 03/29/2003 9:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 316
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 316
Thermodyne64, Thanks for the link smile cool


*** GMC ***
#89422 03/30/2003 2:14 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45
'248,anytime. smile

#89423 04/03/2003 5:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 124
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 124
We had Positive Ground in the same context that the Germans had to drink warm beer. If any of you have ever had a vehicle with Lucas electric you will be able to relate. The two different systems are in part related to the two theories of electricity as mentioned above. In the end it really doesn't matter neither proved to be better than the other.

**** engineers liked the positive ground electrical systems and because they were the largest automaker during the early years, many smaller companies followed suit. In the late 1940' when GM became the largest auto manufacturer engineers at GM belived negative ground was best. Because they were in charge so to speak (sorry, I had to work something in) they led the way. In addition GM made many of the electrical compoents for the independents, so...the independents had little choice to to conform.

The important thing is that you do not install any modern solid state accessory designed for negative ground....into any positive ground system. The results will not be pretty....Randy

#89424 04/04/2003 8:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
One reason I was told was that since the earth is positive ground, some engineers wanted to keep vehicles the same. This is one subject we did not cover in electrical dymanics.


Fred
52 3600
69 C-10
#89425 04/04/2003 9:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11
K
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
K Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11
I think it's just because it's nicer to have a
"positive" system than a "negative" system. smile

http://www.positivepress.com/news/

Murph
...............___
_=======| :p \___
|(.....)_(O)____(....)c
...(O)...............(O)
'49 GMC 3/4

#89426 04/05/2003 9:53 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
As many of you know, my dad has a 1930 Fjord AA stakebed. According to the Model A guys, Fjord went to positive ground (I think some early Model Ts were negative ground, but I may be wrong there) due to the battery corrosion issue. After a while, the battery manufacturers started making better batteries, so it became a matter of preference. Eventually Chevy's negative ground system took over. My dad and I learned the hard way about the A's positive ground system - we killed an old POS battery charger when we hooked it up backwards. Like many things, there was a reason at one time, then it took 20+ years for everyone to get on the same page (6-volt GMC trucks, anyone?).


Get a REAL truck, get a GMC! www.oldgmctrucks.com
1954 GMC De Luxe COE

Moderated by  Jon G, Rusty Rod 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 13 (0.043s) Memory: 0.6688 MB (Peak: 0.7801 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 20:49:03 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS