BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
13 members (klhansen, BLUEMEANIE, RBs36, TUTS 59, 46 Texaco, Gib70, Ponchogl, mvigo, Leo, Possum, Deegs53, 2 invisible),
571
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,776 Posts1,039,277 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 242 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 242 | I have a 1942 Chevy 1-1/2 ton truck that I ran the numbers on (tire size, gear ratio, and speed) and at 50mph I would be running at 2600 rpms. Am I asking for trouble at that speed or not. What is the best rpm to run this engine????? Thanks for your help!!!!
Marv.
| | | | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 6,383 Ex Hall Monitor | Ex Hall Monitor Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 6,383 | I've read that the work trucks ran all day with the governor set at 3000. I personally wouldn't be concerned with 2600.
Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet. The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion. Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 242 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 242 | I have a 1942 Chevy 1-1/2 ton truck that I ran the numbers on (tire size, gear ratio, and speed) and at 50mph I would be running at 2600 rpms. Am I asking for trouble at that speed or not. What is the best rpm to run this engine????? Thanks for your help!!!!
Marv. | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 Bubba - Curmudgeon | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 | 2600 rpm sounds OK to me?
| | | | Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 546 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 546 | I thought a '42 would have a 216. RPM's still dont seem excessive.
"Do not walk behind me, for I may not lead. Do not walk ahead of me, for I may not follow. Do not walk beside me either. Just leave me alone, you're starting to freak me out."
1957 GMC 150
| | | | Joined: Feb 2012 Posts: 84 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2012 Posts: 84 | Chevy began production of a 235 in 1941 as an option in the 1 ton+ Big(ger) Bolts. Relativly rare. A scoop oiled babbit engine like the 216, same bore and stroke as the later pressurized 235.
Last edited by Drydock; 04/01/2012 1:12 AM.
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,107 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,107 | here is my speed chart for my 40. it has 7.50x16's on it with a 4.56 rear. this chart was generated from a web calculator that i have verified with my westburg tach and my gps. MPH RPM 40 2009 45 2261 50 2512 55 2763 60 3014 somewhere i read where gmc designed for a continuous engine speed to be 2/3rds of max.(cant speak for chevy) so with that being said 2/3rds of 3400 equates out to 2278 which is 45 mph on my truck with the pointer sticking straight up and down on the speedometer. not to say you cant run it higher but i found that all my trucks run their best, sound their best and i can hear the best when i run that 2/3rd rpms. the sweet spot on my 40 is 2450 which is 47.5 but i run 50 on the big roads when i want to get somewhere fast. what is the condition of your engine? mine is freshly rebuilt. | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 | 2/3 of governed rpm was considered the rpm for fuel economy. However if the engine is in good shape, running at the governor doesn't hurt them. We never had a Chev, but when we used GMC to actually haul loads of gas, we even bumped the governor up a little or removed it. As long as we had enough radiator to keep them cool, they were fine. We used to get radios out of Ford cars which were also 6v neg ground with heavy 6x9 speakers and that did wonders for drowning out the engine and wind noise. | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,544 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,544 | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,901 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,901 | Not for another decade or so.
Give me ambiguity or give me something else
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 242 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 242 | My numbers for the rpms 2600 is what the Randys Ring and Pinion calculator said. Tires 34.5, 5.43 ring and pinion at 50mph, 4 speed trans. Engine has 55,000 miles on it.
Marv. | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,915 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,915 | Iron pistons were what kept engine speed down back in the day. | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 581 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 581 | Panic,
I know you're correct, but I don't know WHY? What happens with the iron pistons that doesn't with aluminum (or whatever)? The iron get too hot, expand, and seize in the cylinder?
-Michael | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,901 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,901 | I think they just weigh a lot more...
Give me ambiguity or give me something else
| | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,544 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,544 | The cast iron pistons do weigh more than aluminum, they also take more time to warm up and fit the cylinder than aluminum. The amount of force put on the connecting rod is greater with the cast than the aluminum. If the engine gets hot enough to stick the piston to the cylinder wall your going to have bigger problems than a piston dragging against the cylinder wall. If it starts to stick to the cylinder wall you can figure on a bore job with new pistons at the least. I you ease your truck up to speed you should have no problem. I drive my '50 216 50 - 55 and just take it easy, once up to speed things go along just fine. With a bigger truck you may be a bit slower. Just take your time getting it up to speed. | | | | Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 194 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 194 | The heaver piston has more inertia which puts more stress on engine components as the RPM goes up. (i.e) Newton's Law: When at rest, tends to stay at rest, when in motion tends to stay in motion. Pistons have to stop and start at the end of each stroke. Easier with light pistons than heavy ones. One man's opinion. | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,696 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,696 | I could never imagine running my 235 at anything near 3,000 rpms. With my Patrick's 3:55 gears and big tires I cruise 60mph at around 2,200 rpms. Purrs like a kitten.
Craig My '50 Chevy 3100 5 window, '62-235cu, 3:55 rear My truck ....... Respect The Rust If I'm not working on my truck, '65 m00stang or VW camper, I'm fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
| | |
| |