The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
7 members (VEW, mo2cyl, 2-Ton, Otto Skorzeny, Deegs53, 2 invisible), 614 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,781
Posts1,039,298
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
I have a 1942 Chevy 1-1/2 ton truck that I ran the numbers on (tire size, gear ratio, and speed) and at 50mph I would be running at 2600 rpms. Am I asking for trouble at that speed or not. What is the best rpm to run this engine????? Thanks for your help!!!!

Marv.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,383
T
Ex Hall Monitor
Ex Hall Monitor
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,383
I've read that the work trucks ran all day with the governor set at 3000. I personally wouldn't be concerned with 2600.


Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet.
The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion.
Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
I have a 1942 Chevy 1-1/2 ton truck that I ran the numbers on (tire size, gear ratio, and speed) and at 50mph I would be running at 2600 rpms. Am I asking for trouble at that speed or not. What is the best rpm to run this engine????? Thanks for your help!!!!

Marv.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262

2600 rpm sounds OK to me?

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 546
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 546
I thought a '42 would have a 216. RPM's still dont seem excessive.


"Do not walk behind me, for I may not lead. Do not walk ahead of me, for I may not follow. Do not walk beside me either. Just leave me alone, you're starting to freak me out."

1957 GMC 150
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Originally Posted by jmoore
I thought a '42 would have a 216. RPM's still dont seem excessive.
A 235 was an option in 1942, on 1.5 ton trucks.

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 84
D
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
D Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 84
Chevy began production of a 235 in 1941 as an option in the 1 ton+ Big(ger) Bolts. Relativly rare. A scoop oiled babbit engine like the 216, same bore and stroke as the later pressurized 235.


Last edited by Drydock; 04/01/2012 1:12 AM.

1945 1.5-Ton Chevy Big Bolt
Maynard
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix of the old truck
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
here is my speed chart for my 40. it has 7.50x16's on it with a 4.56 rear. this chart was generated from a web calculator that i have verified with my westburg tach and my gps.
MPH RPM
40 2009
45 2261
50 2512
55 2763
60 3014
somewhere i read where gmc designed for a continuous engine speed to be 2/3rds of max.(cant speak for chevy) so with that being said 2/3rds of 3400 equates out to 2278 which is 45 mph on my truck with the pointer sticking straight up and down on the speedometer. not to say you cant run it higher but i found that all my trucks run their best, sound their best and i can hear the best when i run that 2/3rd rpms. the sweet spot on my 40 is 2450 which is 47.5 but i run 50 on the big roads when i want to get somewhere fast. what is the condition of your engine? mine is freshly rebuilt.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
2/3 of governed rpm was considered the rpm for fuel economy. However if the engine is in good shape, running at the governor doesn't hurt them. We never had a Chev, but when we used GMC to actually haul loads of gas, we even bumped the governor up a little or removed it. As long as we had enough radiator to keep them cool, they were fine. We used to get radios out of Ford cars which were also 6v neg ground with heavy 6x9 speakers and that did wonders for drowning out the engine and wind noise.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
Positive ground Kenneth?

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,901
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,901
Originally Posted by don stocker
Positive ground Kenneth?

Not for another decade or so.


Give me ambiguity
or give me something else
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 242
My numbers for the rpms 2600 is what the Randys Ring and Pinion calculator said. Tires 34.5, 5.43 ring and pinion at 50mph, 4 speed trans. Engine has 55,000 miles on it.

Marv.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,915
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,915
Iron pistons were what kept engine speed down back in the day.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 581
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 581
Panic,

I know you're correct, but I don't know WHY? What happens with the iron pistons that doesn't with aluminum (or whatever)? The iron get too hot, expand, and seize in the cylinder?

-Michael


Please type slow, as I can't read very fast.

1939 Chevy/Central Fire Engine
1941 Chevy/American Fire Engine
1950 Chevy/American Fire Engine
In the Gallery
More Photos in Me Gallery
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,901
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,901
I think they just weigh a lot more...


Give me ambiguity
or give me something else
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
The cast iron pistons do weigh more than aluminum, they also take more time to warm up and fit the cylinder than aluminum. The amount of force put on the connecting rod is greater with the cast than the aluminum. If the engine gets hot enough to stick the piston to the cylinder wall your going to have bigger problems than a piston dragging against the cylinder wall. If it starts to stick to the cylinder wall you can figure on a bore job with new pistons at the least. I you ease your truck up to speed you should have no problem. I drive my '50 216 50 - 55 and just take it easy, once up to speed things go along just fine. With a bigger truck you may be a bit slower. Just take your time getting it up to speed.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 194
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 194
The heaver piston has more inertia which puts more stress on engine components as the RPM goes up. (i.e) Newton's Law: When at rest, tends to stay at rest, when in motion tends to stay in motion. Pistons have to stop and start at the end of each stroke.
Easier with light pistons than heavy ones. One man's opinion.


1954 Chevy Half-Ton
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Shutterfly
More pix on Photobucket

1958 Chevy 1/2-Ton Stepside
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Photobucket

<> + <> + <> + <> + <>
"Time's fun when you're having flies." ~~ OLD FROG
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,696
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,696
I could never imagine running my 235 at anything near 3,000 rpms. With my Patrick's 3:55 gears and big tires I cruise 60mph at around 2,200 rpms. Purrs like a kitten.


Craig

My '50 Chevy 3100 5 window, '62-235cu, 3:55 rear
My truck ....... Respect The Rust
If I'm not working on my truck, '65 m00stang or VW camper, I'm fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.115s Queries: 14 (0.111s) Memory: 0.6750 MB (Peak: 0.7951 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 21:45:30 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS