The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (Millenimech, Shaffer's1950, Otto Skorzeny), 112 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,134
Posts1,056,403
Members48,441
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#833695 03/09/2012 4:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 57
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 57
Just got my sale flyer from Brothers. Showing an underbed tank for '60-'62. Don't recall the major vendors offering one before? Pricey (even on sale) but would like to hear how good the fittage is if anyone bites.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 403
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 403
I do not know What you call pricy but a good Stainless tank will run you $700.00 to $750.00. Aluminum tanks are around $600.00
to $650.00.
I like the Stainless tank for the this reason Stronger, more durable than Aluminum.
The one thing that I see more and more everyday is the top mount fuel filler which I personally do not like. The reason being you have to drag the damm hose over to the bed filler which may mean rubbing the paint or spilling fuel on the paint. Aluminum tanks corrode on the inside just like metal tanks where as Stainless tanks are much more durable in many ways. Just my opinion here.
62Blue
Don

Last edited by Don G.; 03/09/2012 6:39 PM.

62Blue
62Chevy in progress
You've never been lost until you've been lost at Mach3" Paul F Crichmore (Test Pilot)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 337
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 337
When I swapped to an under bed tank my truck was being built as a long distance daily driver, so I wanted all the fuel capacity available without hanging down too low. Rock Valley built a custom tank to my specifications for $550, back in 1998. I’m not sure what the same tank would cost today.

The only mistake I made was mounting a tight elbow on top of the tank to connect the fuel fill. The elbow caused fuel to kick back and shut off the nozzle. Filling the tank took forever, so modifications were in order. Details can be seen on posts #11 and #22 of the following link:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=444502

Post #50 shows the aircraft cap that replaced the fender/neck fill.

Here’s what the tank looks like from the rear. Despite the capacity, it really does tuck up nice and tight:

[IMG]http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/8337/post003m.jpg[/IMG]


1960 GMC 1/2-Ton Pickup Truck
In the Gallery
Updates in the DITY Gallery
Now cruising in the Passing Lane

Moderated by  Hambone, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0