| |
Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,006 Posts1,055,267 Members48,418 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#79969 07/13/2007 12:22 PM | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 158 knuckle head | | knuckle head Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 158 | This is a question for those who have experience with T-5 transmissions.I have a few of these units,Camaro style with the 2.95 first gear ratio.I know there are World Class and non World Class units,and the WC trannys have upgraded syncros and needle beraings on the lower gears.Aside from these differences,is there any real additional torque capacity with a World Class transmission? The T-5 is going into a pu truck with a mild V-8 of around 240 HP,no drag strip action,but the pedal will be floored when necessary  I'm assuming these are similar to the Mustang T-5 that appear to handle reasonable abuse in lighter vehicle. | | |
#79970 07/13/2007 8:57 PM | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | You are right on the difference between the WC & NWC. I understand there are stronger mainshaft & some gears are stronger. Iv,e put 2 of the NWC from S-10,s in pickups behind 350,s. I,m currently running one now & have had no problems. I,m like you if a guy doesn,t do burn out,s or speed shift it will probably last forever. I,ve got a WC in my Mustang with 5.0. I rebuilt it & it is working good. I believe your Camero,s are WC,s. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
#79971 07/13/2007 9:37 PM | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 158 knuckle head | | knuckle head Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 158 | One Camaro T-5 is from a 89 V-8,the tranny tag info matches up to a 1989 World Class .The other is an earlier NWC V-8 tranny.I also have a S10 type T-5 to give me the more foward shifter location if necessary.The S10 unit is also an 89 from a 2.8 V-6 and it's NWC with a 3.70 ish first gear.The info I find is for Mustangs,the WC T-5's have a torque capacity of 300 ft lbs ,the Camaro T-5 must be similar. | | |
#79972 07/13/2007 10:53 PM | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | The 89 s-10 uses an electronic speedo. You cannot hook you cable to it. I don,t know about the Camero. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
#79973 07/14/2007 3:18 AM | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 158 knuckle head | | knuckle head Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 158 | Opps,you're correct on the speedo.I'll dig up an earlier S10 tailhousing.The mechanical speedo drive gear can be positioned on the electric speedo Camaro T-5 mainshaft with careful measuring,shimstock and good old JB Weld.I believe the speedo gears where Saginaw parts adapted to the T-5.There's also an adapter to convert electronic drive tranny to mechanical,but it's 300 bucks. | | |
| |
| |