The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 191 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,089
Posts1,056,141
Members48,436
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
P
Apprentice
Apprentice
P Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
I am going to throw this out to your vast knowledge and experience. I am soon to begin an amateur teardown/rebuild of my late grandfather's 46 half ton 216 into a (hopefully) reliable daily driver that can make safe minimum roadway speeds while bing reasonable on gas. I am curious if anyone has attempted a downsize swap of the 216 for a fourbanger like the GM 2.5 liter distributorless and fuel injected 4 found in the S10. I would probably find a donor and transplant the entire driveline engine to rearend. This may be heresy, but it is still Chevy, is easy to get parts for and simple and longlasting to maintain. I would greatly appreciate any opinions or direction you all could provide. I have owned this truck for 15 years and it has resided next to my father's garage up in Virginia since then. I am going up there to get it next month. Thank you all again for your time and advice. - Chris

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
It,s interesting. It would be sluggish but would have more power then the old 216. The S-10 runs pretty good with it. It would take a lot of weight off the front end & make the truck steer easier. I,d shure want to go with the manual trans. You would need to use an electric fan because the space between the front of the engine to the radiator would be awkward for a shroud & fan extension.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
I am installing a 4 cylinder in my 48 2 ton.
It is 212ci 185 hp and 435 lbft stock. I still exepct to use it like a truck.

Grigg


•1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
•1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
•1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
How about the 5 cylinder from a Colorado?

I would use a megasquirt fuel injection system, but I like to tinker.

You may find that a bigger engine geared tall gives you better gas milage than the 2.5, but maybe not. A half ton AD only weighs 3800 pounds.

If I was going outside the GM engine family I would probably do a BMW six.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
Well, he was looking for something different right?

Diesel's have so many advantages over gas.
There are very few good arguments for a gas engine today, especially for a truck.
In a few years I think diesel engines will be all you see.

Grigg


•1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
•1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
•1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
If you were going to try the 3.5 5 cylinder Colorado engine, you would be better off going for the 4.5 6 cylinder from the Trailblazer/Envoy. That 5 cylinder is underpowered, even compared to the old 4 cylider S10. I've measured the 4.2 (Parents have an Envoy), and it measures pretty close overall to the 216/235. I think it'ld be worth it to get the extra power, especially since you would have to make the same mods either way.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
I once saw a '59 Ford pickup that had a Vega four under the hood. The owner claimed it ran well and was pleasant to drive.

I prefer to overpower my trucks so I'm the wrong one to ask about this. The truck I drive most has a 454.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
Hope this doesn't get me banned from the forum but if you can do all the swapping it sounds like you can do then I'd consider the 2.3 turbo ford 4 cylinder. They would make a heavy T-bird turbo coupe really scoot and turbocharging is the one thing that gives both more power and better economy. An engine supercharged in any way really gets a boost in torque. There are other turbo 4's around but most were for front wheel drive.


Evan
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 72
W
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
W Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 72
If I was looking to stick a non-GM engine under the hood of an old pickup, I'd be looking at a Mercedes 300D engine (either the 5 or 6 cylinder) with transmission. Like Grigg said, diesels have a lot of advantages over a gas engine.

Willy


1947 Chevy 6400 Wrecker

Old Stovebolts don't leak oil
They just mark their territory
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
3
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
3 Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
i think if you were going to do it i would just mount the cab on the s-10 truck and get wheels to fit but why i like stock better but its your truck

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
P
Apprentice
Apprentice
P Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
I truly appreciate all of the advice and counsel. I am still thinking through what course to follow with the 46, and I will surely be seeking more ideas in the upcoming months and probably years as the work begins. To Mr. McCoy, about a year after I got the truck in '93 or so, I almost dropped $200 for a good running but very, very rusted out 1964 Mercedes with a clean and smooth running dual carb inline six and 4 on the tree. Almost prophetic, i thought about the engine, tranny, and steering column with that big white steering wheel in the truck, but I was young, recently divorced and not quite ready to tackle the job. Again, I appreciate everyone's input, and will definitely seek it out all over the forum page. - Chris

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 804
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 804
Why not just bolt in a 250 or 292? How many miles are you going to be driving it a year? Why look for the "ultimate" mileage? Won't a 250 or 292 get you "good enough" moleage still maintaining some power to pull a trailer or something if you need to?
Easy to maintain? Chris, there has NEVER been a motor easier to maintain than a stovebolt Chevy six! There have neen equals, but never anything easier.

Brian


1948 Chevy Pickup
Chopped and sectioned
owned since 1974 when I was 15.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
I'm not sure a turbocharged gas motor is going to get better gas milage than a normally aspirated one.

If you really want good fuel economy then dump the carburator, fuel inject the engine you have, and gear it really tall.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0