The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (mo2cyl, Woodcmiami, 66flea, DadsFirstPickup, 5 Window 9434, TrknGMC, Guitplayer, 1 invisible), 106 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,049
Posts1,055,662
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#7662 06/28/2004 8:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
C
Junior Member
Junior Member
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Hello All,
This is the first time to this site for me. I have the luck of finding a complete 1954 chevy 261 engine in a wrecking yard. My question is, if we could rate the 261's from 54 -62, which would be better? Or are all of the 261's from 54-62 just about the same? I know that the later engines came with the an oil filter as opposed to the oil cannister. Are there any other major differences?

I don't want to jump on this engine just because it is a 261, my goal is to maximize HP an performance. If there is a better 261 to be had, I will hold out and try to locate the best year.

#7663 06/28/2004 9:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
chevy51,

I think you have identified the major diffence in 261 engines: the 1954-1957 had an optional by-pass, canister (remote), oil filter, while the 1958-1962 had an optional full-flow, canister (remote), oil filter.

Maybe someone else knows other differences.

Tim

#7664 06/30/2004 2:37 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,966
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,966
I don't have my 54 Shop manual in front of me now but I seem to remember the Cam bearings are smaller diameter and the main bearings have the dowels in the upper shell for 54 and 55-1st series, same as 235. The later engines have larger cam bearings and slip-in bearing inserts. I personally would not shy away from a 54 261.


Professional Novice
#7665 06/30/2004 3:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
You can easily modify that engine to full flow filter, so that's not a problem. Believe the cam bearings are smaller. It has the 'HIGH' water pump, easier to fit in pre 55 cars and trucks. I don't see any negatives, go for it. I have a 55 first series 261 (about same as yours) just about a bolt in for any 216 etc.


It's easier to get forgiveness than permission!
1946 1/2-Ton Chevy
1953 Chevy 3/4-ton Factory Stakebed
#7666 06/30/2004 6:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
The early 261 used the same cam as the blue flame six in the 53-54 vette. I would not consider them to be inferior to the later 261, save for the oil filter.


Fred
52 3600
69 C-10
#7667 07/01/2004 2:20 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94
Alright!! another '54 261 gets resurrected! cool

I also found mine in a local wrecking yard. I've had it rebuilt and modified for the full-flow filter. I'm still in the process of putting it in the '53 1/2-ton, should be up and running by the 4th of July. grin

I really like the high water pump on this engine, It will help with the cooling at idle I've been told. Does yours have the factory PCV system? Mine does, that's another plus!

Steve

#7668 07/01/2004 1:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 54
L
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
L Offline
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 54
The '54 261 also has shimmed main brng caps. That would be the only thing that I don't like about 'em.

#7669 07/01/2004 2:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
C
Junior Member
Junior Member
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Quote
Originally posted by Little Jimmy:
The '54 261 also has shimmed main brng caps. That would be the only thing that I don't like about 'em.
My plans are to go through this engine and do a total rebuild. I'm not too knowledgeable on the "shimmed main bearings", is it possible to replace these types of bearings?

#7670 07/01/2004 7:50 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
The shimmed main bearings allow for minor adjustments due to bearing wear. Usually you don't have to shim when they're new. Unless you're getting the engine balanced, you won't have any problems. And if you are getting it balanced, you should get the main bearings line-bored to match the crank journals, negating the shims.


Fred
52 3600
69 C-10

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0