| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (1 invisible),
105
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,024 Posts1,055,395 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 117 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 117 | I have deciphered the casting numbers on my engine installed in my '50 to discover I have a 235 cast in 1959 (using lucky mold number 13). I can't find any info on the serial number on the distributor pad, F325JC703. The 703 looks hand stamped.
Any help would be appreciated. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,700 back yard wrench turner | | back yard wrench turner Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,700 |
Wayne1938 1-Ton Farm TruckStovebolt Gallery Forums1989 Silverado 1996 Mustang GT convertible When I die, I hope she doesn't sell everything for what I told her I paid for it! | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | It looks like RingLeader is asking about an engine serial number? Here are 1958 and 1959 engine serial number decodings: http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/chevyresto/58t074.htmhttp://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/chevyresto/59tsn03.htmF325JC703 does not contain year information. F = Flint, MI 3 = March 5 = 25th JC = 4000 series and 3100/3200/3600/3800 series with Heavy Duty clutch (RPO-227) Look at the indices in those books for RPO numbers and features. The 703 is where a sequence number should be, but those numbers usually had a minimum of 4 digits, starting at 1001. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 117 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 117 | Thanks tcelderman! Just the info I needed. Odd on the sequence number though, I went back and checked and it definitely says 703. Maybe someone wasn't paying attention that day in '59. | | |
|
|
| |
