The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Guitplayer, Gdads51, Gray_Ghost, sron48, MRMEROTH11, 1 invisible), 89 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,068
Posts1,055,882
Members48,428
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#744347 05/03/2011 3:20 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 18
N
New Guy
New Guy
N Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 18
I have a 1951 235 block with casting number 3692703. The Stovebolt casting page says it's a passenger powerglide. My head has the casting number 3835909. Two heads match with my block, the above mentioned 3835909 and casting 3835499. When I went change the head gasket, I noticed two water port holes on the head (between the second and third spark plug and fourth and fifth spark plug) that aren't on the head gasket or block. The whole setup is in a '46 2 ton, so I know many things have been swapped. My question is: is there a difference between the head with casting number 3835909 and 3835499? Is one meant for the truck block and one for the passenger block? I'm rebuilding the whole thing, so the new head gasket isn't due to gasket failure. What's the difference between engines equipped with powerglide and truck engines (besides the actual transmission itself). Thanks, guys...

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,028
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,028
I know the later powerglides were drilled for hydraulic lifters and the truck blocks typically were not.


1953 3/4-Ton Chevy

In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix

If it can be built ... It can be fixed.

RB53
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
I haven't checked as I'm in a hurry to leave but what comes to mind is the possibility of a 261 head - steam holes?


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,513
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,513
I believe the holes you are looking at were for removing the casting core sand similar to the "frost plug" holes on the block and are intended to be sealed off by the gasket. Are you saying one of these heads has the holes and the other does not?


1952 1300 Canadian 1/2 ton restomod
You Tube
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 506
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 506
1950-52 Truck 235
block casting 3692703
w/ head casting 3835909 or 3835499

1950-52 Passenger 235 - Hyd. Cam
had a different block
but used the same head casting as truck 3835909 or 3835499

Head Casting 3835499 is also listed for the 261.

For the 261, part # 3703569

and the 1950-52 235, part # 3835545

Same casting #, two different heads....


-Tom

1950 Chevy 3100 w/ 1956 235
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 18
N
New Guy
New Guy
N Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 18
Thanks, guys! I was assuming the two holes were water, but casting core holes sounds about right. Just worried me and I wanted to double check...


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0