The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (sron48, MRMEROTH11, WICruiser, wilbur53), 98 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,068
Posts1,055,882
Members48,428
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 553
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 553
I read somewhere on the oldgmctrucks.com site that GMC frames are thicker than Chevy frames of the same year. I just bought a 42 GMC rolling frame. I measured it next to the middle crossmember and it's .148" thick. Does anyone care to measure there Art Deco frame thickness in the same area?

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,867
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,867
I imagine you could measure ten of them and come up with a range of numbers on thickness. It wasn't an exact science when building these machines back in the day.

As far as GMC parts being slightly heavier duty, many parts were, but with two identical parts, one Chevy, one GMC, I doubt there was enough difference to warrant different tooling for both 'makes'.

Jeff


My 1953 Chevrolet
1947.1 Gallery
1972 C-10 1/2 Ton & 1972 C-30 1 Ton
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Did you compensate for rust and paint? Seriously though, these being stamped members, some variation across the whole unit should be expected. I've heard that the springs were heavier, but probably on the heavy trucks .148 is somewhere between 10 and 9 gauge, consistent with the 9/64 specified in the engineering manuals and also my 37 frame. (Engineers using fractions rather than decimals? What nonsense!)

Last edited by Mad Skills; 04/07/2011 6:35 AM.

1937 Chevrolet 1/2 ton pickup
1938 Chevrolet 3/4 ton pickup
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
some years ago i stored a friends 53-6400 oren firetruck in my shop next to my 51-350 firetruck. looking at them on the surface they basicaly look the same with the only difference being in the grille and hood configuration. i started to look underneath and it was there i saw the differences. everything is heavier on the gmc than on the chevy from axle to axle.


Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0