| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
0 members (),
80
guests, and
0
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,050 Posts1,055,644 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | 
#72639 02/01/2007 10:22 PM | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 19 | I have gotten some info in the general truck forum but thought I would post here for more ideas. I am going to put a 350 T.B.I. engine in my 1964 C-10 and was wondering what the easiest way to connect all of the engine harness into my truck harness. Someone mentioned an aftermarket stand alone harness and controller but I don't know where to look for it. If anyone has anymore info or ideas on spliceing the harness out of my donor vehicle into my truck harness please help. Thanks. | | |
#72640 02/01/2007 11:40 PM | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | Painless Performance products has a harness for that. I,ve never done it but I believe a guy could take the harness out of the donor car or get a circuit & make one up. You will need all the sensors that go with it.
They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
#72641 02/03/2007 5:38 AM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,767 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,767 | Installing "all the sensors" is a pretty tough project. I retrofitted a Crossfire dual TBI 305 into a late-70's pickup once, and installed all the factory sensors, including the vehicle speed sensor behind the speedometer, in-tank fuel pump, etc. It turned into a massive project. There are aftermarket kits that give most of the factory system functions without doing a full rewire, but if you're going to that much effort, the port-injection engine would be a better choice. TBI, while more sophisticated than carburetion, is still a pretty primitive system.
Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
#72642 02/03/2007 6:20 AM | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 202 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 202 | While port injection may produce more hp than a carb or TBI ( though not always true )it can have more problems. TBI gets better mileage than a carb usually and has few things go wrong. TPI is better suited to cars than trucks though many have done them. Mainly they are looking for speed. However it is your choice. Check out the website www.goingfaster.com/spo/praisetbi.html Its quite lengthy and I've read it all. Very well thought out and someone really knows their stuff in my opinion. He compares TBI, TPI and carbs while discussing the L03 engine, the 305. Same applies to the L05/350. I have a TBI 350. Sounds like someone who has been at mechanincing for quite a long time. Just some of my suggestions to your question. I wish you success on which ever choice you make. H. | | |
|
|
| |
