Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Donald Colaluca, 55shaker, TexasA&M48Truck, baldeagle, JW51, Bill Hanlon, Jay R, 1 invisible),
32
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,004 Posts1,055,252 Members48,418 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#64793 08/25/2006 12:53 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | 1957 rusty stock 57 3600. Sat for 20 yrs, got motor back in action, but the old hydramatic wouldn't upshift or drive in reverse. I know many people think I'm an idiot for having the original hydramatic rebuilt rather than swapping it out for TH 400,700, but with the original 283 motor I think the truck will thank me later. The next step (possibly)is to change out the rear end. Which brings me to the question of the high end speed limit of the original rear end. I've heard sixty? What's safe? This decade of cars is new to me so if any one has any suggestions about any aspect of this restoration from past experience, please bombard me with direction. Thanks, New Guy
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64794 08/25/2006 1:23 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | how about this suggestion- don't quit your day job!
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64795 08/25/2006 1:46 AM | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 63 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 63 | The 283 is a good motor and that is what I am putting in my truck. The stock rearends are not noted for going fast. Sixty could have the rpms up. If you want to go faster you can 1) put taller tires on the truck 2) change the rearend ratios to something move highway friendly. 3) put in an overdrive transmission.
Figure out how you are going to use the truck and have fun. Good luck, Wayne | | |
#64796 08/25/2006 2:19 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | Thanks for the info ZB3, I've heard that the hydramatic (and it's being rebuilt as we speak for a small fortune) will go one hundred mph no problem, it's just the differential that's geared low, so I'll take option 3 for 1000 Alex. What would you recommend as a good replacement to let this stock motor and tranny show it's true abilities? And by the way, I was hoping to keep the truck simple- Farm truck, with drag potential. Thanks Again RT
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64797 08/25/2006 2:22 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | Sorry ZB3 I mean option # 2. Replace rear end, just wanted to clear that up.
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64798 08/25/2006 2:29 AM | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | You might look for a 3rd member from a '67-'72 3/4 ton, they have more rpm freindly ratios, 4.10 is common, and will go right into your existing rear end housing. The turbo 700 would be a good coice if you change the trans, it has a deeper 1rst gear than the th350/400, plus the overdrive. Just get the later version, the '85 and earlier have weak pumps.
Bill Burmeister | | |
#64799 08/25/2006 2:32 AM | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 | If you want to drag, you don't want cruizing gears. Accellerating is what wins drags and you'll accellerate slower with higher (numerically lower) gears. | | |
#64800 08/25/2006 6:20 AM | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | Glad to hear you're keeping the hydramatic. They have a reputation for being bullet proof. Check out the old GMC trucks site. Several hydramatic fanatics hang out in the discussion forums. Yes they let Chevy owners in. Lots of good info has already been posted so do a search for "hydramatic". | | |
#64801 08/25/2006 6:49 AM | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 63 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 63 | Depending on tire size a 3.43 would give you decent highway speed and some pull when you need it. If just highway cruizing then a 3.08 or 3.23 or so would be fine. For drags then a 3.73 and higher. Everything is a compromise between acceleration and towing versus top crusing speed and economy. Have fun, Wayne | | |
#64802 08/25/2006 6:56 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | Thanks for the feedback guys, I guess I'm hearing that with the stock rear end I would get more torque but couldn't get too far over 50 mph. Hmmm. What to do. Switch it out with a 4.10 or I'll just leave it alone- burn rubber then drive like AARP on the freeway. Oh and thanks for the vote of confidence in keeping the hydramatic- it is a very unique piece of mechanical history.
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64803 08/25/2006 7:05 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | Thanks for the #'s Wayne, I'm going to see what I can find in the bone yards. I don't know the ratio on the current rear end but it seems to have alot of torque. Thanks for your help, RT
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64804 08/25/2006 2:48 PM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 240 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 240 | Just don't get going to fast and out run the brakes!!!
You Learn more Listening than Talking
| | |
#64805 08/25/2006 5:21 PM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | Good point. I rebuilt the original single master cylinder, but should replace with the dual. Disc brakes in front might not hurt either.
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64806 08/25/2006 7:38 PM | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 769 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 769 | ugly,
Where are you having your hydo. rebuilt and what is the damage? | | |
#64807 08/26/2006 2:27 AM | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,299 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,299 | The HydraMatic is supposed to have 100% efficiency as opposed to about 95 on a modern auto trans. Final drive ratio will be 1:1 so it is same as any manual trans that does not have overdrive. 1st gear is real short and just to get truck moving. After rebuilt, the HydraMatic is supposed to be bulletproof. I think you made a wise choice. go to www.areds.com and check with Leon | | |
#64808 08/26/2006 8:35 PM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 482 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 482 | The hydromatic was a good transmission. I have a version of that vehicle with a dump bed and a 4 speed with a pto.
It seems odd that you want to race a truck that big, especially with a 283, unless drag means drag a trailer behind it in which case you may well want to keep your rear end gears and obtain an overdrive for it for more comfy freeway driving and fuel economy. With that trans you may be able to bolt on an aftermkt overdrive. Mine has the drum E brake behind the trans so I would need a stand alone overdrive (cost about 3k).
Good luck trying to find higher gears for that rear end. There are alot of guys in that same boat and finding even a 4.11 is hard. The original in mine is a 4.57 and believe me, at 50mph that motor is screamin'. To help mitigate the problem I added 19.5 inch wheels which raised my tire height from about 29 to 33 inches. That helped by about 10mph or a few hundred rpm's. This places me at roughly 2600 rpm's at about 60mph. I'd like to get closer to 2k for sound, comfort and fuel economy.
Now regarding brakes. Good luck. There is no off the shelf disc brake kit for a 3600. See the discussion regarding this in the hipo section. When I have this solved I'll be letting everyone know.
Mine was ugly but now its...less ugly. | | |
#64809 08/27/2006 12:25 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 12 | Hey guys, Thanks for the votes of confidence on the old cast iron tranny. I like that bit about dragging a trailer. I'll be lucky if it will considering it's current condition. All I could get from that hydramatic was first- but it would throw enough dirt to bury a honda. So- I'm hoping this old timer rebuilding it makes it as good as the tag phrase "bullet proof". This truck really is too big to competitively race, but I think it could do a pretty quick start. Thanks for your info- I need all I can get.
UGLY 1965 C20 "it ain't supposed to be purty" | | |
#64810 08/29/2006 5:35 AM | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 482 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 482 | Rodger that RTV. Keep me posted and I'm in your area as well... | | |
| |