| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Hotrod Lincoln),
97
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,080 Posts1,055,953 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 3 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 3 | I have a 1965 Chevy PU that I have been working on and off for several years. I had 2” drop spindles put on the front of the truck and wanted to know if anyone reading this might have done the same. I have read several different things saying that if you drop the front end 2” then you are suppose to drop the rear 4”. Is this true? I wanted the truck to be slightly raked but I stress the word slightly. I have purchased new stock springs for the front and a rear replacement spring kit that will lower the rear-end 2” – 3” depending if you use a spacer provided with the kit. I was just looking for some input from someone that has done this already or at least helped someone do it. Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated!!!!!!!!!! | | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 319 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 319 | I've read that there's a 2" difference, stock. Going 4" in back should end with a LEVEL truck. If you want a slight rake, go 3". Mine has 2" front & rear, so the rake is the same as stock...I put a load on every now & then.
cm If you can't fix it with a hammer and screwdriver, you need a bigger hammer.1965 Chevy C10 | | |
| |
| |