The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (1955 1 Series, Dave Richard, Buckeye998), 321 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,156
Posts1,057,021
Members48,460
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 54
C
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 54
I currently have a 3-speed transmission bolted to my 55 235 with the original torque tube driveshaft in my 51 Chevy 1/2 ton pickup. Can I swap out the 3-speed with a PowerGlide automatic transmission without changing the rear end and driveshaft? Thanks for any/all feedback!

Last edited by ChevyTruckKy; 02/28/2010 5:11 AM.
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
No. If I understand you correctly you want to put the PG in your 51. The PG links up to an open driveshaft. Your 3 speed has a different end on it, one made for a closed (torque tube) set up. You would also need a differential set up for an exposed drive. If memory serves me there was a PG that hooked up to a torque tube but in car.
Getting the rear end changed is not major because a centre section from a later model (56 and later) will bolt right in.


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton
"Sedgewick"
In the Gallery
1989 Caprice
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,870
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,870
1950-53 cars had a Powerglide with a closed driveline. I doubt that it would be a direct swap, but you might be able to adapt one with enough effort. I really have my doubts that the torque tube would be the right length, and you'd have to fabricate a rear crossmember and modify or eliminate the crossmember at the bellhousing area. The front mounts would have to be eliminated, and a mid-engine mounting system would need to be fabricated. I doubt that your block will have the mounting holes for mid-engine mounts, as only a few 216's had those holes, or even the casting bosses for them.

Then, there's the burning question of "why"? The early Powerglide was a really poorly-designed transmission that had lots of problems, and only had two gear ratios- - - -too low and too high! You would be far better off to adapt a Turbo 350 or a 700R4 to your engine, and find an open-driveline rear end.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Originally Posted by Hotrod Lincoln
You would be far better off to adapt a Turbo 350 or a 700R4 to your engine, and find an open-driveline rear end.
I agree.

But if you insist on figuring out how to adapt an automatic to the torque tube there are a couple of other options.

The 4-speed Hydra-Matic was offered in torque tube trucks in '53 and '54. It would be a factory parts conversion but you end up with an old design transmission that is expensive to rebuild and does not drive as smoothly as modern automatics like the TH350.

Or you could engineer a torque tube adapter for a modern automatic similar to what Patrick's has done for the Saginaw 4-speed. Do a good enough job and you might find you could make a small fortune selling such a thing provided you started with a large one.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,870
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,870
The Hydramatic trucks had lots of factory modifications, including a different-shaped hole in the floorboard, and frame and crossmember modifications. Retro-fitting one to a standard-shift truck would be a PITA, even with a Hydramatic-equipped donor truck.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
I believe the only difference to the frame and cross members is bellhousing cross member which can be changed with some work. The floor and wiring harness are actually different if you want the truck to look original, though anyone thinking Powerglide isn't doing a serious resto.

Personally I'd rather retrofit a Hydra-Matic than an early Powerglide. But given a choice I'd go open drive and a modern automatic.

Hmmm, the one I'm currently working on I'm going from Hydra-Matic to TH400 with a V-8. That might reveal my bias a little.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,300
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,300
Quote
Retro-fitting one to a standard-shift truck would be a PITA, even with a Hydramatic-equipped donor truck.
I did just this with a donor truck rolling chassis. Frame differences are so that the trans can be removed from under the truck with heavier bolt in crossmembers. The brake line routing is different for the same reason. The trans cover "climbs the firewall" a bit so that bellhpusing bolts can be accessed. There is also the conversion to solenoid starter and a neutral start switch as well as the pushbutton starter switch. You can live without the auto choke but all linkage is different from the gas pedal forward. That and the shift mechanism, a parts truck would really be the only way I would want to tackle the swap. Oh yeah, the driveshaft is a different length.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
I've toyed with the idea of converting my Suburban to Hydra-Matic. Its most likely an idle thought that will never develop into any action. Since I have a complete Hydra-Matic truck and parts of another it doesn't seem too scary.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,300
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,300
Another big thing to consider is that Chev and GMC use different linkages and shift mechanisms as well as the neutral start switch so you need to make sure that the donor truck is correct for the application.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
All of my stuff is GMC so in my case that's not an issue. All mine is '54 or '55 1st too, so it should all be at least close.

The truth though is that I'd be much more likely to adapt a modern automatic than to perform this conversion. I think it would both be less work and would give a better result.

Plus I just found a '53 GMC with a Hydra-Matic and am sure tempted by a first year Hydra-Matic even though I really have no business even thinking about buying another truck right now.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0