Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,076 Posts1,055,924 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 397 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 397 | I'd like to hear some opinions about brake fluid. DOT-3 or DOT-4 versa the silicone type DOT-5. Which would you choose and why?
I'd like to use the DOT-5 type due to it resisting water getting into the system, however, from what I've read it requires silicone compatible rubber parts in the system. If I go this route where does one buy the silicone tolerant parts/kits? Maybe it's just over kill, right? Anyone?
"Lucille" ..... Proud Member of the "Southern Stovebolts" David Wolff 1946 Chevy 1/2-ton In the Gallery | | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 | I stuck with dot 3 in my 52 only because I never had a problem with it and if you got stuck some where it's easier to fix,do not need anything special.
Pete | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | I agree with Pete Dave, unless you’re running high speeds and disc brakes on that '46 I leave well enough alone. If moisture absorbs ion is a concern then I'd just flush it with fresh fluid every couple of years, which isn't a bad idea in any case. Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Dot 3. I had a bad experience with Dot 5 destroying wheel cylinder cups.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I read somewhere that most brake fluid marked DOT-3 actually meets the DOT-4 standards, but is marketed as DOT-3 because that is what people are used to buying.
Nothing I've read has convinced me that DOT-5 is worth the hassles in a street driven car or truck.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 354 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 354 | At the risk of start another silicone/DOT3&4 debate, Silicone DOT 5 won't entirely prevent moisture from getting in. Moisture (water) is not soluble in silicone so any that gets in doesn't dissolve in the fluid but will usually sit around as little drops on the surfaces. If that little drop gets in the right hot place then the boiling point becomes 212 deg F. So you have to have a system that is completely and totally sealed. The advantage of the glycol based fluids is that any moisture that gets in dissolves in the fluid and lowers it's boiling point but it will never down get to 212 deg F since there will never be any pure water present.
Harold Wilson 41 Chevy 3/4 Ton
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 90 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 90 | One other caution regarding dot 5, you do not want to use it in a vacuum boosted power brake assembly that gets it's vacuum from the intake manifold. That silicone will become abrasive if it gets sucked into your motor and gets hot. Plus, silicone leaves a weird film on everything it touches and is extremely hard to wash off. Something to consider if you plan on painting.
Ray | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 | If you use DOT3 and flush the system annually like you are supposed to, you won't have any trouble. Don't spill it on paint, because it removes paint. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | This topic has been beaten to death way too many times.
Dot 5 is for race cars and motorcycles and is really not worth the extra cost and effort if you properly service your brake system with a yearly flush. Plus finding street car / street truck brake parts that are compatible will be difficult.
Steve, you are correct, most of the new brake fluid is DOT3 / DOT4
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 397 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 397 | crenwelge,
Why would anyone want to flush their brake system annually? I've never heard of such a thing. I've had many vehicles and have never flushed the brake fluid ever. Can you explain?
"Lucille" ..... Proud Member of the "Southern Stovebolts" David Wolff 1946 Chevy 1/2-ton In the Gallery | | | | | Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,201 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,201 | I agree, yearly may be recommended by somebody somewhere but I bet there aren't more than a handful of people that actually do it. Mine gets flushed every time I do the brakes which is five to seven years. | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Actually, the "somebody" is the manufacturer. The service interval is listed in both the shop manual and the owners manual. It's not as critical with newer cars with sealed systems, but with the vented systems that the older vehicles use, it should be flushed annually as the manual states.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 | I've been running Dot 5 Silicone brake fluid in my 37 pickup since the early 80's (when is was cheap to buy) without any problem. I recently installed a new rear end in the truck, a dual master cylinder and replaced some older brake lines, like the originals, and am a very Happy Camper. No trouble what so ever. So, I recommend Dot 5, and if you think you will get stuck on the road needing some, they have loads of the stuff at any Harley house.
"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!" My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.Operators are standing by to take your calls! Now cruising in the Passing Lane | | | | | Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 354 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 354 | If moisture is a concern a better solution is to install a modern master cylinder with a sealed cap and a reservoir large enough to hold enough fluid to compensate for pad or lining wear. Then never open it to "top it off".
Harold Wilson 41 Chevy 3/4 Ton
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Not sure if annually was posted but I said every couple of years. The glycol based brake fluid is hydroscopic, i.e. will absorb moisture from the air. This will cause rust to form on the steel parts that it contacts. Often seen in the bottom of the wheel cylinders where it settles often. I think reading back that Ken might be referring to the trucks that he runs in his business, which are probably driven many miles each year. Most of the older systems are vented and every time you apply the brake there is air sucked into the master cylinder to displace the fluid that has moved into the system. The more times you apply the brake the more times the fluid reservoir is exposed to fresh moisture laden air. Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 | .... brake fluid is hydroscopic, i.e. will absorb moisture from the air. Denny! suprised at you! hygroscopic is the word  Bill | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,208 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,208 | I've used silicone fluid in my '37 since I rebuilt it in '99 with out any problems. It stops just fine. Joe | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 | Denny is right in saying it depends on how much you use the brakes. Back when we actually used the vehicles, we flushed the system annually. Sometimes that wasn't often enough. Water causes rust. Rust makes a rough spot in the wheel cylinder which causes a leak. Pulling a hub on a 3/4 or larger isn't much fun. Flushing the system is easier. I have gotten lax because I don't drive any one of my jalopies much. But I would think that most people who have only one classic vehicle would maintain them. With a pressure bleeder, its not even as dirty a job as changing oil. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 14 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 14 | I'm running DOT-5 in my '52. No problem finding it. They have a shelf full of it at my local NAPA store. It's a little pricey though.
Oh, and no problems with performance either. 1952 Chevy 3100In the Stovebolt GalleryMore pictures on Photobucket1946 Dodge WF32Rojo "A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both." - Clint Smith "A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy." - Samuel Adams | | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 64 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 64 | a lot of people never change their auto trans fluid or power steering fluid, either....:-o
everybody is ignorant @ something.the more we work together, the less ignorance there is floating around
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Nothing I've read has convinced me that DOT-5 is worth the hassles in a street driven car or truck. Yep, so I use 3/4 Grigg | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | When I put all new brake system parts in my 54 Suburban, I used DOT-5 (after checking with rubber-hose, wheel-cylinder, and master-cylinder vendors about compatibility). It works fine and has had no problems (except for a dirty/oily/greasey interior of the new master cylinder that was incompatible with the DOT-5 fluid).
The 54 pickup that I am restoring will also have all new brake system parts but it will get DOT-3/DOT-4 brake fluid. I figure why waste the money, why worry about compatibility with rubber parts, and why worry about silicone contamination in my garage (where I paint). I will take 30 minutes a year to bleed the system when I change oil/filter (in the fall, before winter hibernation).
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 | I put all new brake parts in my 1954 GMC 100, checked this scenario out and found dot 3/4 was good enough to last 50 yrs, so I guess it will be fine in mine, I don't think I will live to be 130 yrs. old so let the next guy worry about it. I do use dot 5 in my Harley and it is expensive. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 425 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 425 | | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 445 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 445 | Luc :the military uses dot5 on there equipment.I use it on my 51 now for 11 years.It's silicone base .DONOT mix with 3 or4 dot.No mosture in break lines setting a long time.no rust.Dot5
dan-pa
| | |
| |