Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,185 Posts1,057,286 Members48,467 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#59557 05/11/2006 3:39 PM | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 | Hello, I have a 1948 3600 3/4 ton, and like most of this age/size truck has a pretty short gear ratio rear. I have to opportunity to pick up a 1963 3/4 ton rear end for about $40. It has 3.90 or a 4.57 gears (not sure). Is it worth the hassle, or should I look for something else? Could I use the whole axle, part and parcel, or would I end up just robbing the pumkin, and leaving the rest of the hulk on the scrap heap? Are they the same width? Thanks Aaron | | |
#59558 05/11/2006 4:06 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 58 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 58 | I actually ran into the same situation on my 52 3600 and found that 3.90:1 is about the tallest [highest]gear ratio you can get for that carrier assembly. We just swapped out the R&P gear and a bearing and it worked fine. I can't swear to it, I am sure someone else here at Stovebolt can verify but I beleive the 3/4 ton carrier assembly is the same up until 1972. Any gear ratio taller that 4.47 or 4.11 will help especially if you do any interstate driving. JimBo
Bubba
| | |
#59559 05/11/2006 6:59 PM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 | Anything 3/4 or 1 Ton from 1946 through 1972 are "Carrier Swappable". In order to use the aftermarket ring and pinion sets that were available until recently, you needed a 67-72 carrier, as they are slightly different -- and several were available for the manufacturers to test with. Just swapping in a newer carrier with stock gears should be fine. If I'm wrong someone will come along an correct me.  | | |
#59560 05/11/2006 7:14 PM | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 | Thanks for the info. How much do you think this thing will weigh? It is complete with brake setup. | | |
#59561 05/11/2006 8:29 PM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,158 | I don't know how much it weighs. I would guess that it's pretty heavy, though.
I've never done a whole axle.
All you really need is the carrier. | | |
#59562 05/11/2006 8:39 PM | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 | It's an all or nothing deal... I'm wondering if it is worth the hassle, since I won't be able to deal with it, once I have it, for a while. | | |
#59563 05/12/2006 3:09 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | If it is the 3.90 gears grab it, they aren't real easy to find, and are popular for this swap.
If storing it is a problem remove the center section and keep that part and dispose of the rest.
$40 is real cheap for 3.90 gears. If its the 4.57 I'm not sure it would be worth the hassle. What gears do you have now?
You're going to end up with one full rear to dispose of whether you swap the pumkin or complete year, so if your brakes, bearings and seals are good I would swap pumkin only.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#59564 05/12/2006 1:57 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 363 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 363 | If its 3.90s, you need to get it, no matter how much hassle is involved. I think it is probably a 4.57 if its from 63. I am not sure if you have a mudbog near you, but the guys that run here are buying up the 4.56 and 5.14 eatons to put in their trucks as they are slightly narrower, bulletproof and much cheaper than a 14 bolt FF or Dana 60 (or 70). Unfortunately they guys with jeeps have also realized a 67-72 Eatons with a 4.10 fit real nice in their "trucks", too and many have detroit lockers in them from the factory. | | |
#59565 05/12/2006 2:47 PM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,031 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,031 | that sounds like a good deal. grab all the Ebrake cables too. measure the rear of your truck. On my 3100 i used a 77 burb 4x4 1/2t and that was a great swap. later on if you want to you can change ring and pinion but i don't think you will need to look into a T5 or other tranny
Jim & Caroline The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense." Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
| | |
#59566 05/12/2006 6:06 PM | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2006 Posts: 4 | Originally posted by OldSub: ... $40 is real cheap for 3.90 gears. If its the 4.57 I'm not sure it would be worth the hassle. What gears do you have now?
You're going to end up with one full rear to dispose of whether you swap the pumkin or complete year, so if your brakes, bearings and seals are good I would swap pumkin only. I think I am going to pass on it, since I can't really afford the time to do swap anytime soon. I would really like to do it, but I just can't justify finding a place to put it for now. The rear in my 48 is a 5.11 or maybe a little higher, and needs the seals ans such gone through too. Just wait I'll be in here asking if I should get the same rear end next year for $200. :mad: FYI, since it looks like you are in the area, if you are interested you can pick it fo yourself. Link to AD Thank for all of the help. Aaron | | |
| |