Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,154 Posts1,056,851 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 24 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 24 | I just picked up a '47 1st series 3/4 ton for parts and noticed that the transmission is a 4 speed torque tube type, but then the driveshaft goes to a carrier bearing, then turns into an open driveshaft style rear end. Is this stock for 3/4 ton+ trucks? I'm going to use that setup in my truck to use a newer rear end i think. I've got a '40 3/4 ton and it's got torque tube setup all the way. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 3,596 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 3,596 | That is the stock set-up for 3/4-ton trucks until 1954 when the torque tube was completely done away with. Measure everything and see if the swap will work, someone will chime in on the 40'application I am not familiar with the early Art-Deco truck set-ups. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 | Jake:
I believe the half and half set up started in ’41. Mine actually used a torque tube differential with its snout cut off and an open yoke installed to mate with the open drive shaft.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,897 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,897 | I also have a 1940 3/4 ton. Why change just the rear end? If you are changing the rear for an open driveline, it stands to reason you would upgrade transmissions at the same time... say to a t5.
So I'll make a list of questions... What rear end are you going to use?
1940 3/4 ton has a 6 on 5.5 lug pattern. 1947 3/4 ton is an 8 lugger.
What are you trying to accomplish? Better gears, better braking, more transmission options? Are you trying to use parts you have? I am confused.
What engine will you be running? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 24 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 24 | I'm trying to use the parts that I have, i like to keep stuff as original as possible but mainly it's because of money. I bought this '47 for $200 for parts and it has a lot of things that i can use, and i don't really care about the bolt patterns or anything, but i might put a nova rear end under it that i have. I'm not really restoring the truck, just getting it drivable. I have put disc brakes on the front, but i made the bearing adapters and brackets and stuff so that i can use newer rotors and bearings, that's the one thing that i wanted to make more modern and it hasn't cost me anything. I have a 216 that someone else rebuilt and lost interest, and it came with the bellhousing and transmission, i have a 250 i could've put in there, but it doesn't look as nostalgic as the 216, and i don't need to go fast. I spent 3 years and thousands and thousands on my '67, frame off and all that, with a highly modified 327 and posi and the go fast stuff, but I don't want to do that again, and i can't afford it now, plus i'm having more fun just trying to make it work with what i have.
Last edited by Jake T; 11/17/2009 3:55 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I think you mentioned "1st series". Does that mean that you have the non synchronized 4 speed? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 24 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 24 | yes, it's a non synchronized unit. | | |
| |