The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (rfs56trk, Wally / Montana, 55shaker), 113 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,078
Posts1,056,052
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#588369 10/31/2009 5:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 40
T
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
T Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 40
I have a 1968 chevy longbox that I would like to put on a 1991 chevy long box frame. I know that I would have to take 5 inches out of the 91 frame as the 68 has a 127 inch wheelbase, and the 91 is 132 inches.
Has anyone done a conversion like this before?

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Just out of curiosity, why are you wanting to swap frames? Not much, if anything, to be gained by swapping. The '68s already have IFS, and upgrades are very easy to do.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 40
T
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
T Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 40
I guess because the upgrades that are already on the 91 would cost me thousands of dollars to put on the 68. Disc brakes, Handling equiptment, etc. This whole thing is just a thought as the 68 frame is fine.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
S
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
S Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
TC, if I remember, there are tubular A-arms for your 68 that are not too bad. A set of Q1 coil overs and a 4-bar setup would be low$ as well. While you are right, it will set you back about $1000 to $1500, it would be better than a stock '91 unless you did the same upgrades.

Disc brakes were available in '71 if I remember right. So you may have parts available.


The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Yes, '71 was the first year for the disk brakes, and with some parts swapping, spindles from the '73-'87 can be installed to the original control arms. Out back, the stock '68 suspension will outperform the leaf spring rear handling wise, or as Scott pointed out, a 4 bar can be easily installed.
For the time, effort, and cost to swap the frame, you would be ahead to upgrade the stock frame, and get a better handling and braking truck, plus you'll have a truck that the frame and body align to each other correctly.


Bill Burmeister

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0