The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (Gray_Ghost, papas52, Jon G), 113 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,164
Posts1,056,975
Members48,458
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
J
New Guy
New Guy
J Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
I am wanting to put a modern tranny and rear end in my 53 Chevy 3100 with the Original 216. Was thinking 350 trans and S-10 rear end. ANY words would be appreciated.....! Thanks

Last edited by jgwill26; 09/17/2009 1:24 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,393
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,393
In my opinion your asking a lot out of a 216 to power the 350 trans. Using an S10 rear, would you consider a manual 5spd. from an S10 too. Or are you more interested in an automatic? If so, you may want to replace the 216 with a more powerful 235 or 261.


Drew
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
J
New Guy
New Guy
J Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
Thanks Shark... For the cost right now I would really like to keep the 216 and not upgrade to the 235. Its not speed I am looking for just to lower the RPM's at highway speeds. I would consider anything right now just would like some opinions on the pro's and con's. I have a 235 waiting for a rebuild but for right now this 216 is strong and runs great and would save me some $$$'s.

Last edited by jgwill26; 09/17/2009 2:56 PM.
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
Best bang for you buck would be a T-5 stick shift vs the automatic as the 216 to 350 adaptor is really pricy, not to mention the need for extra power. There are lots rear ends that would work nicely under your 53.

Your major motor mounts with the truck are attached to the bellhousing so you do not want to toss that piece for any automatic. Keep it simple!

Last edited by JiMerit; 09/17/2009 3:25 PM.

It's easier to get forgiveness than permission!
1946 1/2-Ton Chevy
1953 Chevy 3/4-ton Factory Stakebed
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
J
New Guy
New Guy
J Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
Anymore thoughts would help anyone out there do this with their 216. I really dont want to spend a fortune but I also dont want to BLOW my motor. I just want to bring the RPM's down...

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 431
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 431
to bring the RPM's down...just change the ring and pinion
patricksantiquecars.com

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
J
New Guy
New Guy
J Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
I have looked into that and have been told its only a small RPM amount for the cost and only gain 5-10 MPH. Will it not be 5-10 MPH fatser but still have the same RPM's as I am at now? Sorry just learning everyday. New to al this? Thanks...!

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,378
T
Ex Hall Monitor
Ex Hall Monitor
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,378
My 38 216 with the 3.73 rear gear will comfortably run 60+ all day. The 3.55 would put you at a comfortable 65 to 70 with no excess strain on the engine.


Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet.
The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion.
Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270

The calculations are straight forward. If you change from 4.11 to 3.55, your RPM will be reduced by about 16% (at the same MPH).

Someone will post the address/link for an RPM calculator, but let's say your RPM at 60 mph is 3200 with a 4.11 rear; the RPM would be about 2750 with the 3.55 rear. 450 RPM reduction

Or, say your RPM is about 2700 at 55 mph (4.11 rear); at 2700 RPM with a 3.55 rear, you'd go about 64 mph. 10 mph improvement

http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html

(I hope my quick calculations are close to being correct)

Tim


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
S
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
S Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
as you reduce the final drive ratio, remember the engine only has so much torque available. If your running out of power with 4.11's then you will run out of power that much more quickly with 3.55's Just because you can pull 2700 RPM with 4.11's doesnt mean that there is enough motor yet with a set of 3.55's.

Regarding automatics, remember a TH350 is only 73% efficient. The remainder of the 27% goes to make heat. Where a manual transmission is closer to 94% efficient. If your looking at automatics, I would go for one of the overdrive units, either a 200R4 or 700R4 and run a vacuum and brake switch to shift in and out of overdrive.

I agree though, that a 5-speed (with overdrive) is a good choice.


The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 121
C
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 121
Is that really true, a 350 auto is only 73 per cent efficient? I have long said that the automatic transmission is the work of the devil, but I had no idea they were that bad.

I think every high school driving class should make it mandatory that the student be proficient in operating a manual transmission. This would save a lot of gas.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 431
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 431
running out of power wasn't in the original equation, dropping Rs was. which is going to reduce wear on the engine when using the 450 Rs savings. so, in a 1hr drive, he's saved 27k Rs. on a daily basis, that'd be close to 10mil Rs/yr. which is approx 22k miles/yr. i'd say that's a significant saving for the engine, not to mention the gals of gas
check me math

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,028
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,028
is there a T-5 stick that will fit my 53 3600 with a 216?


1953 3/4-Ton Chevy

In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix

If it can be built ... It can be fixed.

RB53
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
J
New Guy
New Guy
J Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
One of my concerns is does the 216 have the power to handle the 350 tranny, or am I asking for trouble? I am not looking for speed just a drop in the RPM's

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
If your looking for a drop in rpm's then the th350 is the wrong choice. The final drive ratio for it is 1 to 1, same as the original transmission in the truck. If you want to drop rpm's by using a automatic transmission your going to need a th200r4 or a th700r4. Using one of these transmissions has a whole set of issues to put in and make work properly. As far as the 216 having enough power depends on many things. If your motor was fresh or one in good tune it would probably handle having it connected to a overdrive (higher final drive ratio) (more speed, less rpm's). If you motor is tired then it would have a hard time with the overdrive.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
J
New Guy
New Guy
J Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
Thanks everyone keep the info coming...


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0