Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (48jim1ton, 2-Ton, JW51, Jman, 32Fordpuchoptop, Jay R, Peggy M),
92
guests, and
4
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,042 Posts1,055,601 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 166 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 166 | I have a 66 bluebird apache. I just blew my engine. 350 4 bolt main. Is this the right engine to be using on this 22 footer fully loaded or should I get one with more power. Its a four barrel as well. Thanx. Cheerz ! | | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 | What is Your gear ratio ? That has a lot to say on what engine to use . High or low RPM when Your driving ,trans type , what speed You drive at .
Pete | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,761 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,761 | You might get a slight bit more pulling power with a tall-block 366 cubic inch truck engine, but the weight will increase considerably, and none of your 350 accessories will bolt on. Another step up in power and displacement would be a 427 or 454, but they're both gas guzzlers. The big block engines don't like high RPM, but they're torque monsters and they don't need to rev up anyway. The 454 in our 35 foot Swinger motorhome is about as tough as a two dollar steak, but it really likes the gasoline! Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | GM goodwrench engines has a 350MD crate engine that is designed for 1 1/2 & 2 ton trucks. It is tough & is designed for torque. It is an exact replacement for your engine. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,636 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,636 | I drove 64 48 passenger bus that had a 327 with a 4bbl and it had plenty of go power. Another 350 should do quite well and will be more economical than the big block engines. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,961 | There is a lot to be said about something that will bolt right in. Unless you are looking for a challenge, I would consider a 350 crate engine. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 66 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 66 | Like the others said, the tranny and diff ratio's will have a lot to do with it. How did you blow a 4 bolt main? The 350 should do fine. If you can find one cheap you can get all the power you need with rebuild. I'm currently rebuilding the 350 out of my truck and when I'm done it'll have 320 hp and almost twice the stock torque. I had to by new everything for my motor and I mean everything. It was still less than a crate motor. I have pretty much just made it 10 to 1 compression, advanced the cam shaft 4 degrees, and a few other things like new heads and such. I know that the newer bluebirds used Caterpillar diesels, and the bus I ride every morning is an 88 International bluebird, I definitely notice a difference when it's fully loaded even with the diesel, but a 350 should do perfectly well.
"So this year, I am upgraging my policy of zero tolerance to one of SUB-zero tolerance, which is MORE than zero." -Principal Jindraike
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | I'm going with Jerry on this one. While the 327 and 350 can make to power to move a bus, really what you want is an engine that makes lots of torque, preferrably down low in the powerband. Back when i was in school, we still had gas powered busses, mostly IH, but a few were GMCs. The Jimmies were all tall-deck 366 and 427s. Same goes for the Kodiac trucks that the place my Dad worked had, no smallblocks, all tall-decks. You may find tit more economical to run the big block over a smallblock in that application, simply because the biblock will make the power where you need it without having to mash the gas to get it do so.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 166 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 166 | This puppy is in B.C with Huge mountains. I should have mentioned that,...sorry. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,636 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,636 | The 327 in the 64 48 passneger bus would pull a 6% grade with no problem, but if you are in a mountainous area a larger engine would benefit you. Even the 327 would only average 6-7 mpg on gas, and I don't think in that application a big block would do any worse. But you would have a good bit more umphh to pull those long grades. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | Cummins QSB with a Banks twin turbo kit.
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | |
| |