The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (Millenimech, Bill Hanlon), 115 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,026
Posts1,055,400
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#53911 12/24/2005 4:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
S
Junior Member
Junior Member
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Hello
I have a 67 Chevy short step & am trying to decide if I should keep the 250 six thats in it or use the 292 six I have in another truck (a 67 GMC long fleet)Plan to keep the Chevy & sell the GMC
The 292 seems to run smoother than the 250 & have been told they're better motors
So far have rebuilt the front end & rear end, power steering & power assist brake master & put in a turbo 350 trans
any advice will be appreciated

#53912 12/24/2005 5:52 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,100
3
3B Offline
'Bolter
'Bolter
3 Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,100
Hy step67, If the truck was never equipped a 292 from the factory it would involve a lot of fabricating to install it, if it would fit at all, different mounts are needed and it is physically taller than a 250. Hope this helps you make up your mind, I'm not trying to scare you just make you aware of whats involved.

#53913 12/24/2005 6:37 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 175
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 175
The 292 was an available option in your truck. It mounts a bit bifferent so it'll take a little work to convert, but not to bad, if thats what you decide to do. To convert or not depends on what you want to do with your truck. If you are going to tow anything or routinely haul stuff, I'd say go with the 292 for the extra low end torque of the truck motor. However, the 250 is a better hot rod motor. The best way to get horsepower from a small displacement engine is wind it way up. For example my 1100 cc motorcycle engine makes 120 horses, but ya gotta wind it 9000 rpm! The shorter stroke and lighter crank of the 250 allow you to wind it higher quicker without a bunch of custom work, and the 250 is still a 7 main bearing engine, so it is very tough. Go over to the Inliners International site and check out what some of the guys are doing. On this board, even though it is called Stovebolt.Com, you'll find a lot of resistance to actually using a stovebolt motor in your truck.

Boo


We don't need no stinking V-8s!!
#53914 12/24/2005 2:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
If you have both trucks there it should be an easy swap. Both engines were available in those models. The 292 is a tougher engine. It was built for trucks. The only weak part is the stock exhaust manifolds. When driven hard they will warp, crack, & burn out gaskets.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
#53915 12/24/2005 5:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,002
L
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
L Offline
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,002
The biggiest problem you will have is the power steering brackets. The 292 block is 1 3/4 taller than the 250. The Alternator bracket will have to me moved up. There are at least two different alt brackets, one appears to be cast and the other two pieces of steel welded. My .02
Larry


I don't own a vehicle that isn't old enough to drink.
#53916 12/25/2005 1:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
S
Junior Member
Junior Member
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
I want to thank all,for your advise. Since I have both trucks the mounting of the engine shouldn't be a problem I can swop mounts etc. from one truck to another. The 292 has power steering on it as well as Larry mentioned.
Basically I want the more reliable way to go (most people tell me get a V8) but as Boo stated we don't need no stinking V8.

#53917 12/27/2005 4:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
C
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
C Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
i switched from a 250 to 292...they both run about to same to me..the 250 could whine up little faster but doesn't have the torque the 292 has..


1966 Chevrolet C-10
1971 Chevrolet Camaro RS
1989 Pontiac Bonneville
MY GARAGE...www.dragcitygarage.com
#53918 12/31/2005 6:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
W
Junior Member
Junior Member
W Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
I have a 292 in my 65, and no disrespect to the 6 cylinder. I plan on putting in a 454. But I do have to say the toughest engine I ever had was a 6, it was in a dodge truck a 225 slant 6. Ran without oil and water for about 70 miles and all it done was crack a head,burn up the water and oil pump. I put a new head on it, both pumps, and checked my bearings, filled it up with fluids and went another 80,000 with no problems.


Keep it between the mayo and the mustard!!!!!

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0