The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
7 members (Leo, 1955 1 Series, Mike B, Danielbolt, Wally / Montana, Bill Hanlon, 1 invisible), 88 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,154
Posts1,056,863
Members48,456
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4
O
Junior Member
Junior Member
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4
I had originally wanted to build a retro rod. Using a dropped straight axle. That's why I decided on a 261. Everyone I know is trying to talk me into subbing. Citeing cost, for disc brakes. Driveability, etc. all valid points.
I,m at critical decision time. If I don't keep the 46 front frame, then I'd probably go with a 292. What I'd like, is to hear from people who've done similar projects. Pros, & cons. Degree of difficulty, vs, advantages, etc. My choices are, Keep to the plan, dropped axle, respring to drop the front even more, with modern shocks, & disc brakes. Sub it. Or replace the entire 46 1/2 ton frame with something like an S10. Whichever way I go the eng will be 261, or 292. Chevy 3 spd standard OD. With a modern rear end.
I would really appreciate you taking the time to give me the benefit of your experience, so I don't have to reinvent the wheel.

Thanks, jj


overthehillracer
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
I have heard that it is almost easier to drop the old body on a newer truck chassis than it is to update the old chassis for modern engine, suspension, etc.

But considering you want to still use a stovebolt, then the old chassis is what you probably want to stick with. I would think you could still get the front suspension out of a modern truck if it's a 2WD version, and enjoy a much smoother ride without having to totally alter the ride height of your stovebolt truck. That's what I'd like to do someday.

The old suspension is VERY stiff, but it's okay. Why not go ahead with the bigger inline 6 anyway, while you decide what to do with your suspension.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0