Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,076 Posts1,056,280 Members48,441 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 | OK I just started the restore on My 52 3100 last week and today I get a call from My son in laws freind , He's got a 3/4 ton long bed frame complete with motor all steering stuff everthing but the body and it's free come and get it , so what do You think go with 1/2 or3/4 ton short or long bed .I need Your thoughts on all this . Pete | | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 707 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 707 | A 1/2-ton will be cheaper to run and have a higher resale value, all things considered.
Front end will mostly be the same (springs, axle, steering), and the engine would be a straight swap. Spares are good, and you could flog what you won't use right here! 1951 3800 Be the change you want to see. -hotshoe
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,780 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,780 | I would stay with the 1/2 ton myself, but if you have the room,go for the 3/4 frame. Spare parts aren't bad either. Running board braces, front cross member, shock mounts, bumper brackets, engine, transmission,steering box etc. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 841 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 841 | depends, if you are going to use it as a truck- the 3/4 ton will be way better. years ago i thought i would never have a 1/2 ton again after owning 3/4 and 1 tons. long story short i have a 63 1/2 ton and my 64 3/4. if you are just going to use it for "tooling" around the extra beef of the 3/4 won't be worth extra cost of gas and parts. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 334 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2005 Posts: 334 | Go with both trucks! Then you could have the best of each, and there's nothing like having more than one old Bolt! Samantha | | | | | Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 513 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 513 | I kinda like the 3/4 ton myself, and parts aren't that much more. If you would like a long bed go with it. Another thing is if you are interested in updating anything engine, trans, rear end,the 3/4 ton has an open driveline vs. the 1/2 ton has n enclosed. you could put a later modle rear end under the 3/4 ton easily and get more of road friendly gear ratio. you can't do that with a 1/2 ton without changing your trans 1949 Chevy 3600 Flatbed all orginal 1964 gmc 4000 1973 gmc 6000 2005 chevy duramax 4x4 1994 chevy 1500 Trucks are GM and Tractors are Orange "I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom." - General George S. Patton | | | | | Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 131 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 131 | If you have to choose one, examine the "what am I gonna use it for" factor. If you want it as a working truck, the 3/4 will be more logical, but if you just want it to tool around town and get ice-cream, better with the 1/2
Personally.. I'd go with the 3/4 (Unless the frame is shot :-0)
Strike that ... I'd probably take both.. 1952 Chevy 3804My 1952 in the Gallery The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke | | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,644 | I wish I had room for both , because I would enjoy building both I'll keep You informed on long or short. Thanks Pete | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 462 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 462 | | | | | | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 467 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 467 | I've got both Pete (not on road yet) but I'm liking the 3/4 as a good solid work truck. The tunabolt will be on the road this year hopefully. 1/2 ton (lobsterbolt) looks a little flimsy but still neat.
Last edited by mapleleaf; 03/02/2009 6:58 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,026 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,026 | I'll take the other 3600 if you don't want it!!  One more won't hurt!!
Robert C. If it's true what they say, "You learn from your mistakes," I'm a Genius in the making. 1950 3600 | | | | | Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,775 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,775 | I'd go for the 3600. You can pretty much do the same things to both, but the longbed is so much sweeter. The only bad thing is the driveline. You can't get the traditional upgrades like roller bearings and disc brakes for a 3600 like you would for a 3100. The rearend with the 3600 is another issue. Whatever gearset you have, that's pretty much what you got to stick with. Maybe a 3600 truck with the 3100 front suspension and a later model 6 lug rearend out back, you would have the best of both worlds. | | |
| |