The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (Peggy M, Otto Skorzeny, Ponchogl), 87 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,052
Posts1,055,729
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#505650 02/13/2009 8:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
R
New Guy
New Guy
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
I'm kicking around the idea of putting a corvette rearend in my 51 suburban. However, knowing that the vette is a sports car, I am not interested in a stiff, uncomfortable ride. I like the idea of an independent rear for a softer ride as well as the handling. Anyone else tried this? If so, how did it ride? Just curious.

Last edited by Rich M; 02/13/2009 8:51 PM. Reason: spelling error

1951 GMC Suburban
In the Gallery

He who hesitates is lost..........I'm sorry, where was I?





Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
IMO opinion without knowing all your plans or details I think it would be a waste of time & money UNLESS you did a complete front end suspension replacement too. If that were the case the proper way to go would be a full chassis replacement with complete new modern components.

If all you want is a softer ride and handling then bag it with a modern 4 link. A heck of a lot easier and less bucks. Plus you'd have full ride height and firmness at your fingertips.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
A live axle with properly setup leaf springs will match the ride.

I own and drive a C-4 Corvette frequently and with the 'performance' suspension it is a little harsh. But most of the kits that mount that suspension in something else swap the fiberglass traverse leaf springs for coil overs which allow you to choose how the vehicle rides.

I'd suggest going with the Corvette stuff on both ends if you are going to do this. I love the crisp precise handling and if my Suburban came even close it would worth the work.

But the Corvette is shorter length wise and shorter height wise. Both of these figure into the handling and simply mounting Corvette suspension on your Suburban won't overcome some of the disadvantages of all that steel six feet off the ground and a 20 inch longer wheel base.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
R
New Guy
New Guy
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
I guess I should've been a little more clear as to my intentions. I will probably drop this gal onto an s-10 frame. I know the bag/ 4-link combo would be easy to do, however, I thought a corvette rear would be something different in regards to this old suburban. I suspect there are not many IRS suburbans out there. However, if the resulting ride is not going to be comfortable, I wouldn't do it. That's all that was intended by my question. I apologize for the confusion. Also, sorry for the late response to your posts, Wednesday's high winds where I live knocked out power until yesterday (just in time for Daytona yahoo)


1951 GMC Suburban
In the Gallery

He who hesitates is lost..........I'm sorry, where was I?





Rich M #506599 02/16/2009 10:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Rich..wouldn't an S-10 ride easier than the original anyway? Just curious and don't mean to criticize your intentions. Perhaps a long wheelbase S10 SUV would be a good candidate.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
There is at least one Suburban out there with an IRS from a Corvette. I think I saw pictures of it on the HAMB.

I doubt you'll be able to decern a difference in ride running an IRS. A leaf spring rear suspension in good condition will ride pretty nice.

At a swap meet Saturday I saw front and rear suspension from a 2000 Corvette with the rear mounted transmission. Going that route under a Suburban might be unique, and moving more of the weight to the rear might improve both handling and ride.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
R
New Guy
New Guy
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
The transaxle corvette suspension would be cool but the technology is too new (i.e. pricey) for my budget. I'll end up sticking with the s10 swap. Im always looking for ways to be different- some of those ideas, after some thought, aren't practical, wind up costing money I don't have, or I find out it's not original. However, It's my nature to explore off-the-beaten-path ideas headscratch. And, I tend to think out loud by asking questions- sometimes (and often) before thinking them through dang. Who knows, maybe I'll come up with a winner one day yahoo. Anyhow, thanks for your input, guys. Expect more ideas from me - some good, some bad, and some totally ridiculous. ohwell


1951 GMC Suburban
In the Gallery

He who hesitates is lost..........I'm sorry, where was I?





Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 293
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 293
www.flatout-engineering.com
They sell vette IFS and IRS for many old trucks, check them out.
I am also thinking that one day (time and money...), my 57 Suburban will get this. I am sure the ride would really improve a lot, maybe not down the Interstate or around the fairground, but pretty much anywhere else. I have several vehicles with a stiff rear axle and am certainly tired of the way they all ride (speed bumps, bad roads, sharp turns...), compared to all the vehicles with factory IRS I have driven, even old. An IRS can only improve things!


'57 Chevy Suburban; '70 Chevy Impala.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
I don't know about availability over in the States,but a junkyard contender might be a Jaguar back axle.It's an IRS unit with loads of diff options and as tuff as old boots!
It would certainly be man enough and can be made to look good too!.
It's quite a common swap over here. Guys use them in loads of different cars/vans etc.
You should be pretty close to the correct width too.
Just my 2c.


1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in Scotland
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Flickr.
I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings
"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Originally Posted by jockbolter50
Jaguar back axle.It's an IRS unit with loads of diff options and as tuff as old boots!
I believe the Jag is a Dana, just like the 'vette. In 'vettes there were two different differentials, one of them a bit stouter than the other. I'm not sure which was used in the Jags.

The suspension design on an Jag is a lot different than a C-4 'vette, which is what the kits I've seen are based on. The Jag might be easier to mount without a kit.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Center section is Dana 44 in both cases (depending on what year 'Vette). 'Vette rears with the complete suspension and mountings aren't too hard to find, especially the '84-'96 style. I see them on a regular basis when i go to the Hoosier and Super Sunday swap meets. Many times, the matching front suspension with crossmember is also being sold, too. Never got prices, but I don't think they were too far out of line.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
If money wasn't a problem, how about one of these? grin


1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in Scotland
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Flickr.
I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings
"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0