Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,190 Posts1,057,342 Members48,469 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#49054 08/15/2005 6:13 AM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | Which engine should I drop in??? I need some advice regarding a perdiciment about which engine to put in this truck. Well, I'm riding the short bus since I got this truck; and have demonstrated that on a couple occasions so far. Really; in fact it's just a learning curve that i'm on regarding the visual identification of these older engines. I'm a child of the end of the GTO, Mopar, SS age so these predate my interests until now. All that said, I just figured out that the 216 I thought I had in this truck is really a 194 that was manufactured between 62-70. finally to my question. The truck came with a 283 V-8 and radiator that will fit this truck. the PO says the condition of this engine is unknown, but it appears to be a runner. Casting #'s are from 58-64. PO says the 194 did run; he heard it; had a little bit of a rattle; PO reports nothing too major sounding, tho. I think I'd like the power of the 283; but don't want to go to the trouble of putting it in if it's a dead soldier. Going with stock is out, since I don't have the means to get a 216/235/261 going for it(or rebuild the current motors, for that matter). Anyway, which engine should I drop in??? | | |
#49055 08/15/2005 6:54 PM | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 975 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 975 | Well..If we are voting, I would go with the V-8.
I like a 283. Since it is out of the truck, I would have the heads done and anything else not too expensive, if money is a problem. While the heads are off, check for wear on the block.
Other things I would do...new fuel pump, a nice broad range intake manifold, rams horns GM exhause manifolds.
Even if the 283 is a dead soldier, V-8s are a dime a dozen. | | |
#49056 08/15/2005 6:57 PM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | thanx for the vote; I'm leaning that way myself...I was just going to take the gamble and drop it in and see if it's a runner...since the shoestring budget I'm on broke a long time ago. | | |
#49057 08/15/2005 7:12 PM | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 121 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 121 | Does your 283 have a bellhouseing and trans?? does the 194 bell and trans fit the 283?? These are some questions you need to know. But the 283 would be sweet  and much better than a 194 :rolleyes: in a 3800. first thing i would try is to see if you can get the 283 running, block it up good with a rad and check her out, gap plugs,poits oil= [change] should be a low buck no buck start to finding out  . Just make sure you block it up SOLID. Im sure there is some good help here on the Bolt, GOOD LUCK | | |
#49058 08/15/2005 7:24 PM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | What it looks like to me is that the PO was getting ready to do an engine swap because of the rattle in the 194. The truck came with the radiator for the 283 and 194, as well as several bell housings that will fit the 283 to the current transmission. I think I'll try that run in thing. thanks! | | |
#49059 08/15/2005 10:49 PM | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | That 194 will never work in that truck. They would barely pull a Nova. Thats all they came in. The 283 will hook up to the same bell housing.  They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
#49060 08/16/2005 1:54 AM | Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 221 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 221 | | | |
#49061 08/16/2005 4:43 AM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | well; I'm convinced that at least, I'm not going to put that 194 back in; regardless if I get the 283 to be a runner for me. I blocked it up on a crude test stand and when I get a coil, I'll give it a test. | | |
#49062 08/16/2005 9:45 PM | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | If you have stock ign. the coil from the 194 will work. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
#49063 08/17/2005 5:28 AM | Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,571 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,571 | If you want to stay with a straight 6, the 250 will fit on the same mounts as the 194. A 292 will require moving the right-side mount forward. | | |
#49064 08/17/2005 5:53 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I've always liked 283's and the 194 certainly isn't original, so I guess I'll vote that way too.
The bellhousing that fit the 194 is also going to fit the 283. You need to know that your exhaust manifold and steering box are going to cause a problem. Search through here and you should find several descriptions of the problem and ways people have solved it.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#49065 08/17/2005 6:43 AM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | Good point regarding the exhaust! I was also wondering what kind of changeover I'm in for with regard to the motor mounts? | | |
#49066 08/17/2005 7:08 AM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | Ok, so I've looked around a little; and am a little spooked when I hear about having to move the clutch pedal and steering gear box to accomidate exhaust on the 283 V8. Is this the case? Does anybody have any information about how much trouble it's going to be to put a V8 in my 49 3800 stakebed? | | |
#49067 08/17/2005 7:06 PM | Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,571 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 1,571 | Personally, I'd find a larger 6. Much easier to solve the exhaust and other issues. | | |
#49068 08/17/2005 10:41 PM | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 95 Member | | Member Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 95 | The later model 6's, 250's and 292's are a lot easier to install than the V8. The stock 292 pulls better than the V8 in bigger trucks because it has more usable torque. It all depends on how much work you want to do and what you are going to use the truck for. On this site I've seen both 250's and 292's as freebies. I bought a complete 70 1 1/2 ton with a good running 292 for $300. Put it in a 54 6100 and love it. Redcoat | | |
#49069 08/18/2005 6:18 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | The 250 and 292 sixes use the same clutch and bellhousing as your 283 or other Chevy V-8. So choosing a six instead of V-8 won't solve any issues with clutch linkage.
It does solve the steering box/exhaust interference problem.
Its not clear to me if the 194 was ever installed and working in the truck. If it was, then any clutch issues were already sorted out.
I would not expect a 283 to pull like a long stroke 292, but I'll play tractor pull with my V-8 powered truck against any 292 powered pickup that comes along.
You need to choose the option you'll be happiest with. If the options are the 194 against the 283 I don't think its a contest. If the options are broader, the first consideration is how you want to use the truck and that choice should drive what motor you are looking for.
I have a good running 454 that came in a running truck for free. No its not for sale, but I mention it only to suggest that inexpensive options are out there. I also have a solid 350 (not for sale either) that came in a van I paid $150 for.
Good cheap V-8s are out there. I've seen similar deals on sixes, but haven't dragged any home. Decide how you are going to use it, then look for the right motor for that use.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#49070 08/21/2005 5:39 AM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 | you can always go to a late model car or truck and use a hydraulic or cable. 1960 chevrolet truck used hydraulic clutch setup.go to the pick a part and look around lot's of cable setups,that would give you extra room for the pipes. exemple s-10 truck with 4.3 v6 might work, good place to start good luck. | | |
#49071 08/26/2005 2:26 AM | Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 266 Custom Title | | Custom Title Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 266 | If you're looking for the least amount of work and money to get it going, go find a 250. You won't have any interference problems and it will have enough snot to at least make the truck move, the 194 would be a complete slug. You won't be happy with it. You can find good running 250's for free. Just my .02
49 Chevy 3600 65 Chevy K10 48 International KB-1 Service Truck 55 Willys CJ5 - Chevy 331 powered 26 Model T Roadster Rat Rod 70 Tucker Sno-Cat 442-A 96 Dodge 3500 Cummins dually flatbed x-cab 4x4 06 Jeep Wrangler LJ rock crawler If you can't fix it with a hammer, it's an electrical problem | | |
| |