Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,060 Posts1,055,835 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 15 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 15 | Hello All, I recently purchased a 49 Chevy COE. I want to lower it using the original frame. The lower the better! Any suggestions on what I can do. Thank you in advance for all your help. Don Jr [email protected]413-246-8452 Agawam, MA | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | This is the low mileage original you want to make safe and dependable in your other post? My suggestion is keep the low mileage original stock and find a rust bucket to make your low rider from. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | I agree.
If you want a little drop and disc brakes you can switch to the front axle from a P30 chassis, but it will need to be narrowed. With the original springs it gains you a 2" drop, as it has (if I remember right) 4" of drop from centerline of wheels, while your stock axle has 2" of drop from centerline.
If it really is a nice truck, would be best to leave it as is. And if you must modify it, tasteful and discrete is always better than loud and ugly..
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 | | | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 15 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 15 | How do I post pics on here??? | | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 1,144 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 1,144 | post pictures on a hosting site such as photobucket then post a link here | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | More information would be helpful here.
Using the original frame you could chase ideas such as Z'ing and dropping the front axle. You could do things like cut down the cab support framework, bringing the cab down with no modifications to the frame itself or the suspension.
You can channel the cab over the frame.
Why do you want to stay with the original frame? Do you want to keep the stock motor and motor location?
We could spill ideas here all day, but not knowing what you are trying to accomplish, and what you do not want to change, its hard to know what direction to go with those ideas...
And yes if you have a stock original truck some are going to complain when you modify it. I've tried to avoid 'hacking' any nice originals and as a result passed on buying what would likely have been the perfect truck for my COE project. Instead I bought a rusty pile of junk that will take years to repair, and once I'm done it will look nice enough they will still be offended.
I've been kicking myself since, and will likely buy the next cheap clean '54 GMC COE I see and ignore the the stock and resto guys as I cut it up.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 51 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 51 | Steve, That snub nose I sold you for nothing was not a rust bucket...but close. At least our modified COE's will reach freeway speeds, handle better and stop sooner.
Dallas | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Dallas I was referring to the one I paid good money for. I think I paid $200 plus about that much in gas. Turns out it was rotten rusty.
The one I got from you is much better and probably won't be modified much when the cab is on its new frame. Don't tell my wife but you aren't the only one building two COE's!
Both my COE's have been at highway speeds. Setting on my trailer...
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 51 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 51 | Steve,
Now I feel I over paid for my two COE's. My wife is fully aware of the fact that I have two COE's (she's not happy about it though). If it were not for you, there would be three of them in the garage and I would probably be sleeping in one of them.
Dal | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I try to be real cheap about this hobby, so I don't have a lot of money tied up in any of them.
Recently someone commented on how many cars and trucks I have, and I pointed out that I've paid less total for about two dozen trucks, a Corvette and a Cadillac than I did for my wife's Subaru. I did the math twice and its an accurate statement. I recently committed to buy a '57 Chevy, and it should still be true after I pay for that one.
But my wife doesn't care about the money aspect so much as she does just knowing how many of them we have. Two or three of mine are out at Jeff's and I have mine parked in different areas of our yard just to keep her from having to confront the real count...
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 32 | Or you can order a complete IFS from Fat Mans Fab for about 3500.00 | | |
| |