The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (Chris's 46 / 515, SWEET, Maybellene, 1 invisible), 160 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,161
Posts1,056,958
Members48,458
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Anyone done a successful intall of an M2 IFS on the Art Deco 3/4 ton? I have read about several AD 3/4 tons M2s but none on the '41-46. I know that the frame measurements are close to the 1/2 ton back to the second cross member. If anyone has done this I would like some advice.


Jas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 338
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 338
draglink

I have not done this but I believe the measurements are the same for both trucks in front of the cab. I have both a 1940 1/2 and 3/4 ton truck and I believe they are with these trucks. The 1946 is different than the 1940 so I can't help with measurements. Some one on the list with a 1941 - 1946 1/2 could take some measurements for you.



Bill Schickling

1940 1/2 ton, 1940 3/4 ton
My web page
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks, Bill.

The part nos. for the front and second cross members are the same which would somewhat support your belief. I will get some reliable measurements somewhere.

Thanks, again for the reply.

drag


Jas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 338
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 338
drag,

Good luck. Let me know how it works out. Some day I will strip off the front suspension on the 3/4 ton and an IFS would be my first choice. I've done the dropped straight axle thing already.


Bill Schickling

1940 1/2 ton, 1940 3/4 ton
My web page
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,276
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,276
The entire front suspension from a 67 to 72 Chevy/GMC pick-up unbolts with the cross member it is easily adapted to fit most any other truck frame rails. The nice thing about it is that all the suspensions mounting points are part of the cross member and if you need a narrower track width you simply narrow the cross member. The motor mounts bolt to both the frame rail and the cross member so if a V-8 swap is in the works they are easy to adapt to fit after the cross members width has been altered. This also give you a choice of weight ratings from ½ ton to 1 ton duelie as they all come apart in the same component type manner, much like the aftermarket front ends sold by the rod shops
If you wish for a more car like ride many prefer to graft a Nova/Camaro front sub frame to their trucks.


The difference between men and boys is the price of their toys.
Grant from Roy, Washington
1956 6100 Chevy Dump Truck in the Gallery
1964 GMC Drump Truck in the Gallery
user
http://s1301.photobucket.com/user/56Taskforce/slideshow/
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Grant,

Now the 67-72 truck sounds like a good alternative. I will follow up with research on this.

The car ride is not my goal. I want to be able to drive the freeways with disk brakes under me. I am finding that the choices for the eight luggers are well hidden when it comes to modifying the existing hubs and axles for disk brakes and higher gears. My preference is not to cut my frame and to use my front and rear axles, but I want to drive it 65-70 mph.

Thanks, Grant for some good info.

Drag


Jas
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
W
Apprentice
Apprentice
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
You really do not hae much of a choice....Must II.

Don www.meyerbrosrods.com


Don Meyer - Mech Engr(retired)
48 GMV
66 RR
64 Corvair
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
MII is not your only option. You can find 4.11 gears for your rear end, which will be an improvement over the 4.56 gears. There has been discussion about an 8 lug disc brake kit. It is not available to my knowledge yet, but should be pretty soon.

An upgrade from the "huck" brakes to "bendix" brakes will also be like night and day. You can pull the backing plates and hubs off a 53-59 3/4 ton for that upgrade. It's a bolt on change.

A 2 chamber master cylinder with a booster will also help in stopping your ride weather you convert to disc brakes or not.

At the end of the day it all depends on what you want out of your truck. If you like the quirky way a 46 3/4 ton truck drives, keep it mostly original. These trucks are getting hard to find in an original state. Preservation is actually a pretty cool thing. There are plenty of incomplete projects for sale out there that have already been subframed.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks for that information, bigbad.

Would that gear update be the 67-72 Eaton HO72 carrier swap, or is there another way to go to 4.11?

draglink


Jas

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0