Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,026 Posts1,055,406 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 254 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 254 | i want to get a new harmonic balancer for my engine and was curious on the fact that say my old balancer is a 6" would it cause any problems if i bought an 8"?
thanks Nate | | | | | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 | Nate,
I don't know nuttin about your setup but I do know this, everything driven by that new 8" crank pulley will now spin 33% faster. That might not be OK!
Stuart | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 | i'm in the process of having an engine built for my 49,a .30 over 350.i just had this conversation with my builder.he builds alot of race motors and a pretty busy guy so i would hope he knows what hes talking about.he said pretty much it didnt matter either one would work since their internally balanced.se said they would run fine without a balancer.that their basically a place to bolt your pulleys and to keep it from leaking oil out the timing cover.i asked him which he preferred,and was told the 6 3/4 only because of less rotating mass.but then said its not that big a deal.i had bought a junkyard 8" he said it wasnt worth spending the money to switch either would be fine..........dave 1949 Chevrolet 3100 "When this thing hits 88 miles an hour, you're going to see some serious sh%t." -Doc Brown
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 77 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 77 | If the balancer were not really needed-- do you think the manufacturers would have spent the money to install them? They are there to do just one thing--- dampnen the harmonics in the crank-- has nothing to do with the internal balance of the engine. if you look at some of them, they have a rubber insert to allow the outer dampner ring to float. As for the driven speeds of the accessories, that is dependent on the pulley size-- which bolts to the balancer so you can install whatever size you need on the balancer. On some of the old engines, it was in fact just a cast plate to bolt pulleys to, or it was the pulley itself. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | David: I would seriously doubt anyone who claims to be an engine builder if he made the statements you claim this "race" builder made. Why not use the one that is supposed to used on your engine? Frankly I think he is full of prunes. I hope Hotrod Lincoln chimes in on this as I do respect his opinion. We're sure to get a lot of input on this one.
Good question David and Thanks for posting it. Thanks to you also OldIron. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 | just relayin what the man told me...........dave 1949 Chevrolet 3100 "When this thing hits 88 miles an hour, you're going to see some serious sh%t." -Doc Brown
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | Old Iron didn't say what he's working on but I assume its a SBC. Ive always used the 8 in. on 350's & the 6 in on the 305's & smaller. Thats pretty much the way they came from the factory. I too would question the opinion of an "engine builder" that made a statement like that. I would like to hear Hot rod Lincolns opinion on this also. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,748 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,748 | Yes, the damper is important- - - - -it relieves torsional stresses on the crankshaft created as the cylinders fire. On a V-8, the longer the stroke, the more twist the crank gets at each firing impulse, so the 350's and other engines with a 3.48" stroke need a bigger damper. The 265's and 283's had a 3" stroke, so the damper ring could be smaller. I think a 327, which has a 3 1/4" stroke had a slightly larger damper than a 283. The small block 400 didn't have enough crankcase room for big enough counterweights to be internally balanced, so the damper and the flywheel had to be intentionally manufactured off-balance, and the 3 3/4" stroke required a really big damper ring.
Bottom line, I'd reccomend using whatever size balancer the factory engineers chose to use. It might avoid a stress fracture in a crankshaft somewhere down the road. If you're using the original type front engine mounts on a 55-up pickup, it might be necessary to trim the mounting brackets that bolt to the front of the block for damper clearance when using the 350-size damper. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 |  ..................dave 1949 Chevrolet 3100 "When this thing hits 88 miles an hour, you're going to see some serious sh%t." -Doc Brown
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 841 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 841 | there was a guy years ago on the inliners board that claims his race engines didn't need har. balancers. so you never know what someone will say or believes so your builder wasn't the only one. i can attest they are fairly important, having one fail on a 292 years ago. since those bent 8 cranks are so small and light mabey you can get away with just using a nut threaded on for a balancer.......hehehe | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | Sometime during the last year I read an article on the design and function of the harmonic balancer. It had original design test data showing crankshaft distortions with and without the damper. The difference was very dramatic. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 254 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 254 | i'm sorry guys i posted it up so fast forgot to put in the correct info its a 350 Chevy, and also i feel embarassed/stupid.... i measured my harmonic balancer earlier today and its 8 inch....  so i kinda answered my own question.... i figured it was 6 inch but obviously my eyes are not as acurate as a tape measure.... none the less this was a very informative discussion thanks for all the input Nate | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 581 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 581 | For those who need it, The Damper Doctor is a source for whatever damper/harmonic balancer (or motor mounts, etc.) issue you have. Damper Doctor Good to deal with, in my experience. -Michael | | |
| |