The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
1 members (‘37ChevyPU), 61 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,022
Posts1,055,381
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#415752 05/23/2008 12:51 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 769
L
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
L Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 769
If my stock tie rod ends are in good shape, is there any reason to upgrade to the newer style?

Will I feel any difference between the two?

Lonnie

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 334
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 334
I've kept my stock tie rod ends in good shape over the years without any problem, and I've had my truck 32 years. I see no reason to change.
Samantha


1954 Chevy 3100
Picked from the Field
Follow in the DITY
Samantha #415790 05/23/2008 2:29 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,082
R
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
R Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,082
i have heard the newer tapered style tie rod ends are better for todays roads and radial tires.
leonard


1957 Chevy 3100 1/2-Ton
Photobucket pictures
In the Gallery
RATRODKING #416014 05/23/2008 5:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 769
L
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
L Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 769
Thanks for the response.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
I agree with Samantha. I've had my truck 12 years and the rod ends are still original with no problems.


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton
"Sedgewick"
In the Gallery
1989 Caprice
Sedgewick #416090 05/23/2008 11:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
This style rod end was used for many, many years in many, many different applications. As long as they were kept lubricated and adjusted they were just fine. I've never heard of a problem with them other than when they were worn out.
I’m sure that the major reason for the change or upgrade to the new design was that it needed much less maintenance and is much easier to service or change when it did need replacement.
I can’t see how either design would have any bearing on handling with the roads of today or today’s tire designs. It’s my feeling that this falls into the same category as the urban myth that roller wheel bearings make the AD truck handle better than ball bearings in the front hubs on today’s roads and with modern radial tires.
Both those arguments seem illogical to me and I would have to see some pretty solid research that shows a difference in handling to convince me. Now upgrading to an IFS, now that will make a huge difference. Driving an Advance Design truck with stock suspension at 70mph is not for the feint of heart.
Anyway, I feel maintenance is the key word in operating any of these vintage trucks.
These vehicles need lubrication and service on a regular schedule as called out in their service manuals. Every time I drive mine or fill it up with gas I pop the hood and it's in every 1,000 miles for service and adjustments.
There is no comparing them to the new cars, which under normal conditions can be driven for 10,000 miles before your have to open the hood and even then usually don't need much more than oil and filter changed. The last four new cars that we've owned all went well over 150,000 miles without plugs being changed and every time I pulled them they looked as good as new. They never needed anything else other than the regular oil changes and tires and brakes replaced at 50 or 60k.
We’ve come a long way but the old way was fine if you follow the rules.
Denny Graham
Sandwich, IL


Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Denny Graham #416094 05/23/2008 11:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 549
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 549
I agree with everything you said Denny.

I do prefer roller bearings over ball bearings though. I don’t think it has anything to do with todays roads or radials, but think they’re a little more durable simply because they have more surface contact.

Avette4me #416114 05/24/2008 12:47 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 334
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 334
I agree with Denny also - if the reccomended maintainance is performed, these trucks will keep on working just like they have for many, many years. I wonder how many 2008 trucks will be around in 2058 or 2068?
Samantha


1954 Chevy 3100
Picked from the Field
Follow in the DITY

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0