| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Hotrod Lincoln),
97
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,080 Posts1,055,953 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 1 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 1 | I am building a 1953 3100 I want to update the front end to IFS. I am thinking about using a Heidt, but not sure what the ride height will look like. Does anybody have any pictures they would share with a Heidt Mustang II installed. Maby sombody knows of a better setup. I do not want to slam the front end. Email stexasboy @Yahoo.com
Thanks Scott
Scott
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 438 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 438 | Scott--
Welcome to the Stovebolt! You've come to a friendly spot with lots of expertise.
Going to IFS CAN change your ride's front end, but the final look is up to you. You're right that most IFS set-ups, whether bolt-on or grafted clips, will bring the front end down. The stock '47-54's use the straight axle and ride high with a feel for every bump. The conversion to IFS brings a lower profile, but you can offset that change with block, spindle and spring combinations that approach a stock profile.
I regret I don't have any photos of my own to share, but hope others will pitch in. Welcome! | | | | | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 18 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 18 | Brother used a heidts crossmember kit and it was not too low with stock type spindles . The 2 inch drop spindles are what you see in most pictures . I dont know how to post pictures yet but i will see if we can . The little bit lower ride height is a little safer i would think . | | | | | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 438 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 438 | D8- A recent thread walked folks through posting an image on the Stovebolt. Visit: 38 Chevy Thread We lika da pictures!  | | | 
#3889 12/04/2003 11:03 PM | Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 358 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 358 | I would go with one of those nifty dropped axle fron Cenpen: less expensive, very traditionnal. cenpen.com | | | | | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 259 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 259 | Here's a picture of my truck with the Mustang II suspension. I have to add that I have air ride and the front end would normally be about 2 inches higher.....if that makes a difference  [img] http://www.50chevy.freeservers.com/right%20side%20truck.JPG[/img]
Joe
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 12 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 12 | Chevy1- Is that with 2" dropped spindles or stock height spindles? | | | | | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 259 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 259 | Tucker,
I am running stock spindles with the Heidts 11-inch disc brake conversion kit and Fat Fendered Street Rods Front and Rear Swaybars.
Joe
| | |
|
|
| |
