The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (lumbersawyer, SmalltownTRKGuy), 352 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,164
Posts1,057,076
Members48,463
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
I want to lift my bed enough to slip the rubber pads onto the mounting blocks. The truck doesn't have them. I plan to undo the 6 long bolts, the rear fender bracket and the bolt which attaches the skirt to the fender as well as bolts from the fenders to the running boards. The bed will sit 1/4" higher (pad thickness) but am wondering if the pads will compress from the weight of the bed so these holes will line up. I am not concerned about the long mounting bolts. Any comments/suggestions will be appreciated.


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton
"Sedgewick"
In the Gallery
1989 Caprice
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 406
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 406
OK. I did a simple test to see how much the pads compress under load. I placed two pads between two ground steel plates and measured the gap between the plates at .240". This is basically the pad thickness without a load on them. Then I started squeezing the plates together and measured the gap at various loads. Here is what I found. At 100# load, the gap had not changed appreciably. At 500# load, the gap was .235", a compression of .005" which is the thickness of two layers of newspaper. At 1000# load, the gap was .223", a compression of .017. At 1500# load, the gap was .205", a compression of .035".

Remember there are two pads in this test, so the load per pad is 1/2 of the total load. It seems unlikely that a typical truck would see 1000# per cross sill on a regular basis. Even a compression of .017" is probably absorbed readily by the structure of the bed.

Over time, the pads will likely take some kind of permanent set and change thickness just from having a constant load on them. I have no data on that. I just did this test to help you get an idea of the stiffness of the pads and their response to the load applied.

Also, we recommend you place the pads between the wood block and the frame, to avoid possible distortion of the bracket on the cross sill.

Let me know if you have questions

Mar-Ktech

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,953
Thank you. Obviously I appreciate the effort you made for this question. Interesting figures. No there will not be 1000# of weight per cross sill nor in the complete bed. The heaviest item I ever carried was a cast iron PowerGlide trans.
Thank you!


1949 Chevy 1/2-Ton
"Sedgewick"
In the Gallery
1989 Caprice

Moderated by  klhansen 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0