Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,069 Posts1,055,886 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#25335 02/16/2004 4:48 PM | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 | Geez, While I'm at it why not add another detour to my project. Yesterday while working near the tranny I do see engine oil on the clutch cover as well as the rear outer portion of the pan. I looked at Oly's "blonde proof" tech tip instruction and it doesn't seem that difficult except a blonde might ask while reading his neoprene section if you still need to loosen the other caps to allow the crank to drop a tad like in his wick type seal section. http://www.stovebolt.com/techtips/rearseal.htm Also viewed previous comments in the archieves with most people saying to go with neoprene replacement seals anyway. Any other comments, suggestions or tips?
Craig My '50 Chevy 3100 5 window, '62-235cu, 3:55 rear My truck ....... Respect The Rust If I'm not working on my truck, '65 m00stang or VW camper, I'm fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
| | |
#25336 02/16/2004 4:59 PM | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 587 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 587 | I thought if your engine takes the rope type seal, a neoprene seal would not fit. If I am wrong someone tell me! | | |
#25337 02/16/2004 10:04 PM | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 | Does anyone know what year did they switch from rope to neoprene for the 235 ?
Craig My '50 Chevy 3100 5 window, '62-235cu, 3:55 rear My truck ....... Respect The Rust If I'm not working on my truck, '65 m00stang or VW camper, I'm fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
| | |
#25338 02/16/2004 10:10 PM | Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 | don't know about the 235, but I know that the rope seal 283 blocks won't take the neoprene seal
Bill | | |
#25339 02/17/2004 4:03 AM | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | 235's never came with anything but a rope seal. There is a neoprene replacement that will work on 1955-62 engines. The main reason the neoprene seal will not work on the earlier engines is because they used shims on the mains and the ends of the seal can not butt flush with shims.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | |
#25340 02/17/2004 4:13 AM | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 86 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 86 | You can have the grooves machined to except the neoprme seal, which are much better. The rope type seals seap. | | |
#25341 02/17/2004 5:28 AM | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,745 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,745 | I thought it was supposed to leak and drip off that nipple you found? :p
54 3100 with 235 62 flatbed dump C60 with 261
| | |
#25342 02/17/2004 6:18 AM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 | Pre'68 Dave is correct. In fact, it is quite possible that the rear mainseal may not be leaking, but that the oil is escaping where the rear main cap is spaced slightly because of the shims. If so, the oil will leak out through that space. Not much you can do about that, but it would be worth taking a look at. If you replace the seal, rope is the only way to go on your engine.
"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!" My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.Operators are standing by to take your calls! Now cruising in the Passing Lane | | |
#25343 02/17/2004 4:05 PM | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 | My engine is a '62 235. So this means I can use a neoprene replacement?
Good mornin' Tony M. Last night I knelt by my bedside asking the almighty rain gods or goddesses to take a hike between 1-3 today. Watch them laugh and snub my request....
Craig My '50 Chevy 3100 5 window, '62-235cu, 3:55 rear My truck ....... Respect The Rust If I'm not working on my truck, '65 m00stang or VW camper, I'm fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
| | |
#25344 02/17/2004 4:53 PM | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | cmayna, The neoprene seal is fine in a 62 engine. You should always check the crank sealing diameter for pitting and to make sure it has not been turned down, that would be the only thing stoping you. Stock Dia. 3.875".
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | |
#25345 02/17/2004 5:40 PM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 | :rolleyes: Craig, I didn't realize you had a 62 engine in your truck - I thought you were running an early 235. Some of my comments may not be applicable except that I still think a rope seal is best. But, that is my opinion!
"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!" My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.Operators are standing by to take your calls! Now cruising in the Passing Lane | | |
#25346 02/17/2004 7:14 PM | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 962 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 962 | The older NOS rope seals work better than the fel-pro replacements. The NOS seals had asbestos in them, which seals better than whatever is used now.
I did use a neoprene seal in my old '54 235, and it didnt leak any more than normal. :rolleyes: The seal ends did butt together OK in my case. I've come to expect that if a 235 isn't leaking oil, its low on oil.....
Preaching the Hot Rod Gospel according to the 4-stroke apostles:
Suck, Squish, Fire and Fumes
| | |
#25347 02/17/2004 8:56 PM | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 327 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 327 | The rope seal is by far superior to the neoprene. Just because it is "old school" doesn't mean it is "bad school".
Ralphy, The reason you leave 1/64 inch on the upper rope seal is so it will suck into place when you bring the crank up tight. the lower seal needs to be pressed into place (but not an undo amount of pressure- let the crank do that or it will surely leak again)
Oly in Oregon Rest in Peace1945 GMC COE Victory Truck 1953 Willys CJ3B 1955 Chevy 1st series 3/4-ton 1958 WIFE Last series Never say "Whoa" in a mud hole
| | |
#25348 02/18/2004 2:14 PM | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 50 Member | | Member Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 50 | So whats the verdict, on a '54 235 can you use neopreme? I had my enging rebuilt but has been leaking, I am in the process now of replacing the front axle with new king pins. Should I replace the rear seal with the rope while the axle is out???? :confused: :confused:
'52 Chevy 5 window, it ran when I parked it '53 Chevy 5 window, running the streets with me. '55 Massey-Ferguson, tearing up the dirt '89 Harley FXSTS, suicide clutch '92 Harley FLSTC, equal time with the '89
| | |
#25349 02/18/2004 3:58 PM | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,839 | rat, I'll be in the same situation as you very soon while I'm replacing my entire front axle assy. No matter what, I will drop and clean out the sludge in the pan and replace it's gasket. Also no one has yet to answer part of my original question which was if replacing neoprene seal if you still need to loosen the other caps to allow the crank to drop a tad like you would when replacing the rope type seal.
Craig My '50 Chevy 3100 5 window, '62-235cu, 3:55 rear My truck ....... Respect The Rust If I'm not working on my truck, '65 m00stang or VW camper, I'm fishing with the wife or smoking Salmon.
| | |
#25350 02/18/2004 5:04 PM | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | To Rat, as I mentioned earlier on an engine using shims the shim extends about half way on to the parting line of seal preventing the seal ends from butt completly together. If you cut the shim back so the seals can butt the oil can go arould the back of the seal there the shim should be. It is a little hard to explain, but if you study it you will see what I meen. Also the seal groove in the block is deeper on the pre 55 engines so the neoprene seal will not have the correct presure aginst the crank.
cmayna, if your engine has a rope seal now you will need to drop the crank some only to get the old seal out, the neoprene seals when oiled will slip in and out easily.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | |
#25351 02/18/2004 5:18 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 | I've installed both the rope style and rubber lip seal, both work equally well if done carefully.Yes, get a NOS rope , works better than the rubber seal if the crank area where the seal rides is worn or pitted.The rear seals in my trucks don't leak more than a drop now and then and it's maybe just the oily mess underneath created by the road draft tube. It's always best to install the rope seal with the crankshaft removed like some mentioned above by Ralphy.But a satisfactory repair( leaks not too bad,lol.) can be accomplished by just drooping the crank slightly, which requires tranny removal. | | |
#25352 02/18/2004 6:54 PM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 | :mad: Craig - Get a rope!
"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!" My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.Operators are standing by to take your calls! Now cruising in the Passing Lane | | |
#25353 02/18/2004 10:26 PM | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 327 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 327 | "Should I replace the rear seal with the rope while the axle is out????"
YES!!! by all means do!
So much for being "Blonde Proof"-LOL
"Also no one has yet to answer part of my original question which was if replacing neoprene seal if you still need to loosen the other caps to allow the crank to drop a tad like you would when replacing the rope type seal."
Yes!!! It makes things go a lot easier and you can get a "sure" fit when it goes back together.
The rope seal is by far the best bet. Don't use a jack to push it into place. You could push it to tight and then it will leak for sure.You want to let the crank push the upper seal into place for the seal to fit perfectly. If you have an old reground crank (don't we all?) then there will be some amount of wear on the crank (from grim) where the seal goes. The neoprene seals are made only to one size and can't swell up like the rope seals to fill the gap.
I know, from experience, that this can be a miserable task at best, but if done properly you shouldn't need to do it for another decade or so.
Oly in Oregon Rest in Peace1945 GMC COE Victory Truck 1953 Willys CJ3B 1955 Chevy 1st series 3/4-ton 1958 WIFE Last series Never say "Whoa" in a mud hole
| | |
#25354 02/18/2004 11:33 PM | Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 390 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 390 | Iput an 54 235 in my 51.I ordered a gasket set from napa and it came with a neoprene seal.I installed it and its worked fine for me.
1942 1\2 Ton 1951 1\2 Ton 55 willys cj-5 1954 and 59 Cushman Scooter 1960 Biscayne Sedan 1965 G/10 panel van 1966 C/30 Grizzly Motorhome You know you're a 'Bolter when your daily driver is older than you are... My progress pics | | |
| |