| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (Phak1, GMCJammer51, D B Cooper, treegrower, 2-Ton, 55shaker, 1 invisible),
123
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,095 Posts1,056,072 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 2 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 2 | Hey Guys, I've got one large question. Should I get a truck (C-10) from the range of 1962-1972, or get a modern truck? Just for your information, I'm 16 and I've already had a 1958 3100 Apache Step-side (loved it, but couldn't get it titled because I live in Ohio - It's a long story :mad: !) and A 1986 K-10 Scottsdale (Got 6-8 MPG after Carb swap, sold it). I love the old Chevy's and If I could afford it, I'd get an Advaced Design. So what do you think, should I buy a Classic Chevy, or a Modern Truck (Most likely a Dodge Dakota, BUT NEVER A F*#D!)? Thanks. | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | My answer would be get yourself a Classic! The '63-'72 range would be an exellent choice, as many of the mechanical componenets were used up to the late '80s, so availability of replacements is real good. There's also very good interchangability of some components for easy brake/steering upgrades later on.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 9 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 9 | I'm new to the stovebolt page myself, but I will give my 2 cents and hopefully help. Sounds like your concerned about mpg so I gather from the little I know that it will be your main mode of transportation. I love the nostalgia of my 1950 chevy pickup but when it comes to getting to work and earning a dollar for my family, I have to think about reliability and fuel economy in todays rising fuel costs. Get a newer fuel injected vehicle that will get you where you want to go cheap and effectively and if you have the time and know how "and extra cash" get that advanced design of your dreams and live a bit of history. Hope this helps! | | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 707 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 707 | That is good advice, 50. 55 makes another good point. You WILL pay a penalty in fuel economy over a 10-20 year-old Toyota, even with a Dakota. But with a stovebolt six in a 1/2-ton, the penalty won't be all that great if she's kept in(or returned to)good shape. If operating cost is the big issue, the Toy wins hands-down(unless you get a dud, which is easy enough to get around with an inspection). After that, the Dakota with a small engine and a 5-speed, and I hear the S-10 is a good choice, but don't buy a high-miler. But if you can live with a little more maintenance and a little less fuel economy, You'll be able to hand a stovebolt off to your grandson! What's not the VERY coolest about that? 1951 3800 Be the change you want to see. -hotshoe
| | |
| |
| |