The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (carbking, 3B, BarryP), 99 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,134
Posts1,056,738
Members48,454
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
I'm having trouble figuring out exactly what capacity dump truck I bought last week!

Here are the facts:

-There is no VIN tag on the door.
-The title says it's a 52 Pickup.
-Decoding the VIN on the TITLE (3KRC1896) tells me it's a 3/4 ton.
-I've read that the 3/4 ton has a 125.25" wheelbase, but my truck measures 161".
- I'm very confused ohwell

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Tim

picture

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,100
3
3B Online: Content
'Bolter
'Bolter
3 Online: Content
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,100
Hy tpeerson, I decoded your serial number on American Classics website, it breaks down as follows
model year 1952 [March]
model 3600
manufactured in Detroit
1896 is the sequential number
looking at your picture I would say someone has stretched the wheelbase of the truck, I believe the 3600s were all 125 1/4" wheelbase but I'm not positive about that,hope that helps.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,100
3
3B Online: Content
'Bolter
'Bolter
3 Online: Content
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,100
Hy again tpeerson, I forgot to put in the GVW, which is what you really wanted to know, 5800Lbs. I believe, hope that helps.

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 707
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 707
That is a pretty slick lookin' unit. I believe that if you look at the frame closely, you'll see that it has been stretched. Look for two diagonal weld lines on the outer (vertical) faces of the frame, between the back of the cab and the spring anchors, forward of the rear axle. From here it looks like quality work.

A legal GVW on that chassis would have been 8,000# around here.


1951 3800

Be the change you want to see.
-hotshoe
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
BINGO on the stretch!

I never noticed, but here's the "patch panel". Fron the backside you can see the cuts.

picture 1

That would also explain the three drive shafts.

picture 2

OK, now how can I identify the rear end? I'm pretty sure it's not from the original 3/4 ton. The brake drum is 14" ID and the shoes are larger than those the parts store sold me for the 3/4 ton.

picture 3

Thanks everyone!

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
That would be the correct drum size for the 1 Ton. I see that you have a set of those beautiful Huck brakes! I would guess that you are going to find a ratio of 5.14 for the rearend.


1951 GMC 1 Ton Flatbed -- It is finally on the road and what a great time I have driving it!
1951 1 Ton Completed


My Chevy Master 4 Door is on the Road!
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
Quote
Originally posted by truckernix:
That would be the correct drum size for the 1 Ton. I see that you have a set of those beautiful Huck brakes! I would guess that you are going to find a ratio of 5.14 for the rearend.
Thanks truckernix. So are Huck brakes a good thing?

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,893
W
Socket Breaker
Socket Breaker
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,893
Whatever it is, it is cool!

We need more pictures!

-W

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 707
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 707
I don't want to discourage you in any way because I think the truck is cool, but I'm not nuts about the patch panel: Vertical welds on a frame are a bad idea. If it is going to be used occasionally and lightly then there might be no problem. But if, like me, you think a truck is for work, you might be inclined (again, like me) to brutally overload the poor girl from time to time. In that case you'd better keep a close eye on that stretch for stress cracks around the ends of that panel. It's not that big a deal, really, to do it over with a parallelogram shape to the patch panel, and 45* diagonal welds on the frame rails. Maybe not necessary, as I said, but something to watch.
As to your diff, it looks like my old one, which would make truckernix right. My improved ratio is 4.10, from a '72. Spendy, but worth it!
Finally, Huck brakes are bigger, therefore they run cooler, which is better.


1951 3800

Be the change you want to see.
-hotshoe
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
tp,
the Huck brakes is what they used on the 1 Ton up to 53 and they seemed to do the job. Mine are Hucks but I haven't finished my project yet. I am sure that they will be very capable brakes.


1951 GMC 1 Ton Flatbed -- It is finally on the road and what a great time I have driving it!
1951 1 Ton Completed


My Chevy Master 4 Door is on the Road!

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0