Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (MickeyP, David Bush, kades51, Gdads51, cmayna, Donf, 3800GUY),
90
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,049 Posts1,055,702 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 9 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 9 | thought someone could help me to decipher the last portion of the vin code for my 58 cameo pickup. so far i haven't heard a word. are'nt there any code busters(vin)out there? any help will be greatly appreciated. thanks vin# V3A58L 102212
dave hudson
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | V = V8 3A = 1/2T 58 = 1958 L = LosAngeles plant 102212 = assembly sequence number [serial#]
Bill | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | | | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 26 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 26 | I read earlier that all cameos were built in Flint? Is that true? | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | no it's not .... your VIN shows the truck was built in LA, and I wouldn't be suprised if more Cameos were sold in California then elsewhere - why would they ship a complete truck clear across the country when they could get by just shipping some fiberglas panels, the entire truck except for the plastic rear parts was identical to any 1/2T step side, fully optioned
any truck down the line in any of the 10 or 12 plants was either a "standard", spec truck for the lot, or an ordered "job number", assembled to order in among the rest
Bill | | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 9 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 9 | Bill you seem to know your chevy trucks. Is there a way to establish by the vin what number truck (specifically)Cameo my truck was built. ie; #212 or 12 or 2212. They only made 1405 in 58 so 2212 may represent the production # of all or various 1/2 ton p/u,s produced in that year. Your thoughts are appreciated. Thanks, Dave
dave hudson
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | I'd guess the 2212 is just the order your truck was produced in that specific plant.. and the 2212 may not even represent the production order of that particular model (1/2 ton) but could just be the 2212th truck that particular plant spit out that year. The Stovebolts Own VIN Buster accurately decodes U.S. built Chevrolet trucks from 1929 thru 1964.. but just tackles the basics.. Year, Model, Wheelbase, Plant, and Month where available.
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | yes, what Fumblin sez, the different models weren't numbered sequentially, just part of the general flow, it would have been the 2,212th truck of any model made in LA for that calender year, it might have been the only Cameo on a given day, and with something like 275,000 commercial vehicles built in '58 [don't know what percentage was produced at LA, but I'd think at least 30,000 or more], and the Cameo dropped mid year, I'd guess it was built at the end of 57, when 58 production first started, and likely before the beginning '58 .... the resto pak from GM might have more specific info from your VIN, tho' I don't think they did too well with records back then
Bill and you may get some clues about the month built from date codes on original parts, like block casting, trans, rear end | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | I imagine Chevrolet numbered their production the same way GMC did. If so each plant and each series (i.e.3100, 3800, etc.) started at 1001. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | cletis has a point. this was taken from the Stovebolt Tech Tips section regarding '56 thru '59 trucks.. Last was the the sequence number (6 digits and started with 001001 at each plant)
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | Cletis - the 1001 start was for pre-53 production, in 53 they changed to 001001 to start, until 55, in 56 the numbering sequence started at 100001, at each plant for general production, not each series .... it continued that way until 1971 when it changed to 800001 starting number each plant .... Peg! the tech tip is wrong Bill | | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 9 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 9 | glad to see i got you guys motivated. its all very interesting and i'm certain i will pick up some good tips from youz guys. thanks for all the input.
dave hudson
| | |
| |