| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (BC59, David Bush, MikeE, Bucker, MickeyP, Rexville48, dt235sd),
83
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,049 Posts1,055,702 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#22748 04/03/2005 4:07 AM | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | So I just bought a 64 Chevy 1/2 ton. The PO said that it had a 235 engine in it, I think it has a 250 or something. My 60 has a 235 and it looks very different from this "235". Was the style of the 235's changed when GM changed the motor mounts to the side? This one has kind of a wavy valve cover on the manifold side, whereas my older one has a valvecover with straight sides held down by 4 screws. Everything on this motor looks different from the earlier one. If anybody could help me that would be great, thanks. | | |
#22749 04/03/2005 4:31 AM | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 310 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 310 | It sounds like a 230/250/292 to me. Especially being a 64. Chevy stopped the 235/261 in 62.
-Tim '51 Chevy 3104 w/'56 235, 848 Head, HEI Dizzy, Corvette Cam, Split Manifold and Dual Carter YF's
| | |
#22750 04/03/2005 5:34 PM | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | The 194-250 engines were physically smaller than the earlier 235-261 engines. The pushrod covers were stamped with a diamond design and there were two of them. These engines were a lot lighter than the older design too. The 292 was taller than the smaller displacement engines, about the same as a 235. | | |
#22751 04/04/2005 2:54 AM | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | okay...thanks much!!!! It has the two pushrod covers with a diamond design. This engine looks smaller than my 60 235 aswell. How can I determine if it is a 230,250, or 292? Can I find some numbers off the engine and look them up somewhere? Thanks again. | | |
#22752 04/04/2005 6:02 AM | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | In a 64 the engine should be a 230. Start scraping the gunk off the passenger side of the block. Can't recall exactly where the casting number is, should be low and on the rear half. You're looking for a casting number, raised letters. Go to www.inliners.org and go to the casting number section.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | |
#22753 04/04/2005 8:37 AM | Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 196 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 196 | there easy to tell the 235 intakes are on the drivers side the new styl 6 has the intakes on the passenger side i think been a few years sence i last looked | | |
#22754 04/04/2005 9:12 AM | Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 196 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 196 | think im wrong about the intakes there on the same side sorry | | |
#22756 04/05/2005 3:20 AM | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | Okay I will check it out. Thanks much!! | | |
#22757 04/06/2005 9:03 PM | Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 175 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 175 | Here's a problem with casting numbers, and this is irritating as hell! My 250 block has numbers that could be a 250 or a 230. My head has numbers that could be a 250 or a 292. The only reason I knew for sure it's a 250 is because it's an original engine in a 1970, and therefore can't be a 230; plus I know some of the trucks history. The casting numbers ID just won't tell you with 100% certainty. Fortunately most of the external bolt-ons are the same on these engines except the 292 uses a longer distributor. Unless you need internal parts you shouldn't have any real problems. If you work on internals you can find out for sure when you tear it down. If it's the original 1964 engine, it's a 230, but on these old trucks one tends to find numerous surprises!
Good Luck, Boo
We don't need no stinking V-8s!!
| | |
#22758 04/06/2005 10:24 PM | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | yes, just full of suprises!!! My truck is at the mechanic for a safety inspection right now so it might be a few days before I can get around to checking it. thanks sooo much!!!! | | |
| |
| |