BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,270 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 191 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: May 2004 Posts: 191 | Well, I need to hear from you folks that have behind the seat tanks. I'm to the point that I need to make a decision about whether to relocate the tank to under the bed, or get a new original tank for my 56 TF. Frankly, I'm not all that keen to relocate. I did so on Sparky only because I couldn't get a new manufactured tank for a 42, but such is not the case with the Task Force models. My real question is if I install a new stock tank and hoses, etc., am I still going to have gasoline odors in my cab? This truck will be my everyday driver, and I really don't want to smell gas. By the same token, I don't want to give up my stock instrument cluster and go to the expense of custom guages if I go to the Mustang tank. Opinions? Your experiences? | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | I've never had any gas odor with the in-cab tank in any truck I've had - just hafata make sure everything is right, like the sender gasket, the fuel line, and the rubber hose on the filler - the 2 TF trucks I have now have original tanks, and they work fine
Bill | | | | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 | I'll ditto that, make sure the rubber grommet around the filler is tight.
Larry
I don't own a vehicle that isn't old enough to drink. | | | | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | I have driven trucks with the tank behind the seat for 40 years. The only times I've had fumes in the cab was due to old hoses. I've never even had an in-cab tank leak.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,464 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,464 | The only fumes you'll have is from that old wipe rag you forgot was in your hip pocket! | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,952 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,952 | I do get some fumes, generally on a very hot day with a full tank. Thought that was normal but maybe I should recheck my hoses. the sender gasket is good. However I would not relocate the tank. Bill | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | Some people claim it's safer to relocate also. I disagree, if I get hit hard enough in the cab to explode my fuel tank, I wouldn't be alive to feel the fire any way, Scott
And, olblu, make sure you have a vented gas cap too. | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | I don't have any gas smell in my cab unless I happen to spill gas when i'm filling it up.
A tank that is properly installed and not leaking shouldn't stink up the cab at all.
Nothin' finer than puttin' down the road in an old truck, arm out the window, and a big ole cigar hanging out of your mouth.
You may also want to check to see if those vapors you're getting in the cab are not from the engine compartment instead of the fuel tank.
The '52 Dodge I have is horrible for that.
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 25 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 25 | My '55 TF leaked at the bottom seam, not much but enough to smell. I sealed the tank (kind of a time consuming process) but the cab smells great. I didn't like the repro tanks that I looked at. If you take the time and examine closely you can find where the vapors are coming from. Kim | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | I would recommend keeping it in the cab. I too think it is the safer place. Never had any problems with the one in my 52. | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 339 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 339 | I don't get any hint of gas smell in My 52.. As far as relocating the tank, it would be My opinion that the source of the oder could be fixed alot cheaper than a new tank between the frame rails...In the Army when You drove a jeep You were practically sitting on the tank...It was under the seat...Bill B | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,554 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,554 | No smell in my 1951,I like it right where it is.If you are getting fumes,check your filler hoses. 1951 3100 Chevrolet1951 Chevrolet Suburban CarryallImage"A house is built with boards and beams. A home is built with love and dreams." "Look deep before you leap !!!" / "Everything is Everything" "If I say a mouse can pull a house, hitch him up"
| | | | Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 234 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 234 | No gas smell in my 58 unless some gas is spilt. I agree with the others that it is safe to have the tank in the cab. It's mounted inside the frame rails, and there aren't many vehicles that would strike the side of the cab above the frame rails with their own frame. If I were starting from scrach, I might mount it under the bed, but I sure wouldn't go to extra expense to do it.
58 Fleetside, 235, "The Old Buckin' Bronco"
| | | | Joined: May 2002 Posts: 155 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2002 Posts: 155 | I agree with keeping the tank in the cab...Ya gotta remember the old trucks are built with steel..the factories had to relocate the tanks to the frame when they started building them with recycled beer cans...
Geoff
Geoff
68 GMC 3800 56 JD420C w/JD90 Loader
| | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 613 Member | Member Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 613 | the only problem i have with my inside tank{besides the rust}is if i fill it up it will overflow down the side of the truck on hot days.thats why i never put in more that twelve gallons. | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | As far as safety is concerned, if anybody hits you hard enough to rupture the fuel tank in the cab, you aren't going to be alive to enjoy the bonfire anyway.
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 191 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: May 2004 Posts: 191 | Thanks guys. I think I'm going to leave the tank in the cab. It should fit fine behind the 95 Suburban Seats and console. I think I'll fabricate a panel to hide it with upholstery though. Should be an easy fix. Previous owner had the original tank braised, but said he did not think it would hold for long - that I could glass over it with the epoxy tank repair kit. I can hear rust or something inside when I turn it over. That is why I'm thinking of just ordering a new repro tank and avoiding the hassles. Any recommendations? | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 2 Junior Member | Junior Member Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 2 | A new tank is better then repairing old stuff. With all new parts, you won't have any smells. Also, rust particals may screw up your fuel pump.
Just get a bigger hammer!!!
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 313 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 313 | I had a leak in the tank of my first 1966 pick-up. The leak was easy to detect, and removing the tank to repair it was easy. I tend to agree that the tank in the cab is pretty safe. There is a lot of sheet metal protecting it. | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 116 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 116 | as far as fumes in the cab my 64 has all orignal hoses and tank an i dont smell any fumes
LEWIS
| | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | Smell gas? Got a leak? The quickest way to find the leak is to use those strike anywhere matches.
~Jim
| | | | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 46 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 46 | My '59 smells quite a bit when filled (&overfilled) but while 'wheeling last summer the gauge broke , it shows full at all times the ignition is on.Might be wiring, maybe a stuck float arm?? I don't know if it is the original tank, i doubt it- its too shiny. However my question is what is the capacity of the original (or repro) behind the seat tank?? any response is welcomed jeff
220 - 221 whatever it takes
| | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 108 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 108 | I agree with everybody just keep it in the cab...I just replaced my fuel tank on my 51..along with sending unit, and hoses...seems to be fine.. | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | Jeff, the TF tank is about 17 gallons - your problem may be a bad sender or bad gauge
Bill | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 108 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 108 | I agree probably bad guage or sending unit.. | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 339 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 339 | My specs. sheet on a 52 says 16 gal. Bill B | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 | if your concered about the location of the tank buy a panel! being 6'6" tall fitting into the ad cabs won't happen for me unless i relocate the tank like the one i had years ago. guess i'm gonna be content with my panel. mmmm! | | | | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 46 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 46 | Thanks a lot. I've got to get out there and check the wiring from tank to gauge first, because if im right if the wire is shorted to ground(neg.) it would show full too. I was rockin and rollin when it happened.
220 - 221 whatever it takes
| | | | Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 234 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 234 | That's how I remember it, a short to ground will show full. Seems like the most likely scenario for it always reading full, and replacing the wiring from the sending unit to the gauge is a cheap repair.
58 Fleetside, 235, "The Old Buckin' Bronco"
| | |
| |