| |
Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for
MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
4 members (cmayna, 2-Ton, 2 invisible),
47
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,009 Posts1,055,292 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 70 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 70 | I've been reading everything that I can find on the T5 swap. The number 1 problem seems to be not enough spline on the input shaft. The number 1 solution seems to be to extend the splines just a little. What I haven't seen much written about is using a 1/4" spacer plate between the bellhousing and the tranny. This seems like a better alternative than modifying the input shaft. Would the spacer work? If it would, why aren't more people going that route? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,317 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,317 | I don't think they had to use a spacer...if and when they slid their disc on the tweaked shaft and it passed the end of the splines, the problem was resolved.
Can't speak for the others but some very, very, minor tweaking of the bottom of the end of the splines allowed my clutch disc to disengage. Also, the clutch centers vary with different models/brands and the one I used, slide past the end of the splines 3/16". This let everything disengage properly. Putting a spacer between the bell and the transmission would accomplish the same thing.
I think possibly that some folks just ground away and assumed that their disc would slide the additional 3/16" and it didn't. I may be mistaken, but to discover you're having a release problem, you've got to have your disc and pressure plate installed, and I think possibly some folks didn't want to go through the R&R process to verify the disc would slide past the end of the splines.
To me, that is the key element in a successful T5 install. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 | Fortynine5 - I agree with the comments Fla54Chevy3100 has made. I also agree that a 1/4" to 3/16" spacer would solve any problems and could be used without any consequences if you interested in being sure that a one time installation of the T-5 and other components was what you were looking for. I think I would be willing to test it without the spacer before I decided I needed it. If I did, I agree 100% that the spacer would be my choice before I tried to do any "machine work" on the input shaft with a grinder or Dremel style tool. On an older truck, such as my 37, I had to use an adapter plate in order to have the correct bolt pattern. That adapter plate, 1/2" thick, took care of any triming of the front of the input shaft and lengthing of the splines. It slipped right in and everything worked as it was supposed to. All I had to trim was the throw out bearing retain, which is the easiest of all alterations. Joe 
"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!" My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.Operators are standing by to take your calls! Now cruising in the Passing Lane | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 345 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 345 | Fortynine-
You can use a spacer plate-if you go to 1/2" you probably will not even need to cut off the input shaft of the T5. You WILL still need to cut the bearing retainer. However, performing those modifications (including the spline cuts) really was not a big deal. You are not going for great precision, and since nobody will ever see them, they don't have to be pretty. | | |
|
|
| |
