Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Hotrod Lincoln),
72
guests, and
0
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,049 Posts1,055,680 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | Things I don't like about the replacement door handles:
1) The hole in the handle is too small for the lock retainers. I thought first it was because of a little surface rust on the retainers so I filed it off. Still no go. I ended up reducing them with a grinder.
2) The slot for the clip that holds the retainers in is cut too deep. The clip is almost buried in the slot.
3) The original clutch head screws can't be used to attach the handles. They have metric threads. I have nothing against metric bolts and screws but I don't like mixed use. If it's SAE it should be all SAE and vice versa.
What are your thoughts on the matter? | | | | | Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 571 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 571 | Unfortunately, most repop parts SUCK! Almost every aftermarket part I have bolted on my truck needed "massaging" to get it to fit right. Never had to do door handles yet though. Have you done window channels yet? That's next for me. :rolleyes: | | | | | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 68 Member | | Member Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 68 | I'm definately with you on the mixing the sae and metric bolts. I've always hated that and am of the opinion that they could throw away half the sizes in the metric world and itwould be a lot better. Oh say ever other one.....Ronnie | | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | Every repop body and appearence part i've come across sucks hairy, sweaty, tick infested donkey balls.
But that's new parts for ya.. and "improved" mfg processes, and the .16 cents an hour labor.
I'd take a old original part over a sparkling new repro part any day of the week.. they fit better, they're built better, and they'll last longer.. not to mention most original parts are cheaper than the repros.
I guess if you're only going to drive your truck once a month to a local show, or are putting it in a museum, repop parts are alright.. but in my experience, they just don't cut the mustard for daily driver and/or working trucks.
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 571 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 571 | Hey Fumblin, how do you Really feel? LOL  | | | | | Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 156 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 156 | Ordered 4 brake cylinders for my 59, 3 had sae bleeder screws, 1 had metric..reaching around the wheel trying to get my wrench on the bleeder screw is NOT the time to find out why Your wrench wont go on..
"All right, they're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time"
Lt Gen. Lewis B."Chesty" Puller, USMC | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Took me a while to get myself to remember each time that the bleeder screws on my rear brake cylinders take a 9MM wrench.
I find it really annoying!
I've become more selective about where I buy parts and what I replace versus rebuild because of this kind of issue.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 29 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 29 | It doesn't get any better with newer chevy's. I have to carry metric and sae for my 93 K1500. Engine is SAE (good ole 350) - most other mixed. | | | | | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | I put new outside door handles on my 54, from Chevy Duty. No problems installing them and no complaints ... BUT repro's really do suck!
The push buttons show rust pretty soon ... but the worst of it was when a buddy of mine came home with a pristine 1954 Chevy BelAire that has only 45,000 original miles on it! Phew! What a buy ($7,000) ... no rust anywhere. Anyway, when I just looked at the door handles I had a true revelation, man. You could see the quality ... 50-year-old steel and the quality made my brand new repro's look like absolute trash.
One thing I've learned in my 2 years of Stovebolting is to avoid repro stuff like the plague!
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 627 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 627 | My new front wheel cylinders will not fit the cutouts in the backing plates!
Mike Barnes 1950 GMC 1-ton pickup
| | |
| |