The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (JoergK., tclederman, Danielbolt, Peggy M), 177 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,175
Posts1,057,052
Members48,460
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1613338 10/15/2026 6:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
I am upgrading my front brakes to disc on my 54. I also have a dual reservoir MC. I installed a 2 psi residual valve on the front brakes. Should the 2 psi pressure held on the line be enough to hold the calipers/pads tight against the rotors? I can rotate them but it takes some real effort.

Last edited by dgrinnan; 10/15/2026 6:57 PM.

Dave from Northern Kentucky
My 54 3100
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,102
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,102
You should check with the supplier to determine if the Master cylinder already has
built in residual valves. Many do and you don't want to duplicate the effort.
Fred


1956 3100 Pickup/Red/350/3sp OD/PS/Disc Brakes
1957 Bel Air Sport Coupe/Red/355/TH350/PS/Disc Brakes
2017 Silverado LT Single Cab SB/Black/5.3/6 Speed Trans
1947 Willys CJ2A w/F-Head engine
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
I confirmed the MC does not have a built in residual valve before adding it.


Dave from Northern Kentucky
My 54 3100
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,868
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,868
What's the diameter of the caliper pistons? For instance, a 2.5" diameter piston with 2 PSI against it will create nearly 10 pounds of clamping pressure on the brake pads. That will definitely cause some drag, and possibly overheat the rotors. Does the drag on the rotors go away if you crack a bleeder screw open?
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,202
Insomniac
Insomniac
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,202
For disk front / drum rear setup, you need a combination valve. Some call it a "proportioning valve". Like this:
Combination valve


Gord 🇨🇦
----
1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
I do have a proportioning valve and a 10 psi residual valve on the rear brake line.


Dave from Northern Kentucky
My 54 3100
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
I do have 2.5" pistons. Is my best option to remove the residual valve?


Dave from Northern Kentucky
My 54 3100
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,231
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,231
I've been running disk brakes ( '70 - '79 Camaro/Firebird ) since 2000 with out residual valves. I have a combination valve from a early '80 s Chevy car, and a adjustable proportioning valve on the rear brake lines. The rear adjustable is pretty much mandatory due to the lack of weight on the rear axle during braking.

I have never seen the need for the residual valves, why do you want the brakes to drag? The reason I always hear is, they keep the fluid in the line and not overfilling the master cylinder since it's frame mounted. So how does the fluid return, you ever try to push a caliper back in? Gravity in a little brake line nots going to do it. How did the truck stop for the first 50 years with the valves in the lines?

A simple test, go out and step on the brake pedal like you normally due to stop the truck, measure how far down it goes.
do it a couple ties with 5 to 10 minutes between each test.

Remove the valves and bleed out the system.

Repeat the above test and see if the calipers are retracting farther. Wait and hour so the fluid has plenty of time to retract and measure the pedal distant again.

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,106
One of the reasons I need a residual valve is the MC sits below the floor and I have to pump the breaks when I first get in the truck because the gravity drains the fluid back toward the MC. That said, I have figured out at least part of my issue with the tight calipers. I was thinking logically. The brake line outlet pointing toward the front of the vehicle would be the brake line for the front brakes. Wrong. I have my front and rear brakes lines reverse on the MC although I don't understand why that could be an issue. Stay tuned. Once I straighten that out I will see if I can get the system working correctly.

Last edited by dgrinnan; 10/16/2026 2:09 PM.

Dave from Northern Kentucky
My 54 3100
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,231
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,231
I still don't believe the fluid will pull the pistons back, the master would have to be way below the caliper and the lines would need to be much bigger. It's more likely the rear brakes are not adjusted up correctly. With a master cylinders on the firewall, just how much fluid pressure do you think there is pushing through a 3/16" steel line on a caliper seal? It barely bleeds out with the line open.

Originally, the drums all worked correctly, why would disk brakes be any different?

I'm just asking, not trying to offend anyone, I just keep hear the same things over and over on multiple web sites with out any proof its correct.

Bet if you actually measure the fluid hight in the master and front caliper, bet theres hardly any difference, more likely the master is above the caliper slightly.

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 106
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 106
On the cars that I work on, the front brake line is attached to the port nearest the pedal plunger, which is the back port on a firewall mount. I installed my under floor ones the same way. The plunger points to the front of the truck, and I attach my front line to that front port.


1950 GMC 100 Panel Truck, 1958 270,
3-spd Saginaw with BW OD,
3.73 12 Bolt Differential from a 1966 C10,
Front Disc Brakes
Hill Holder
Bought it in pieces 9-1976, driving since 6-1978
Follow in the DITY
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,260
"Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!!
"Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,260
Originally Posted by Joe H
Originally, the drums all worked correctly, why would disk brakes be any different?

Because, while wheel cylinders aren't typically designed this way(I can't think of any), some calipers are designed to roll the piston back in to the body.


Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0