The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (49nut, Otto Skorzeny), 84 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,087
Posts1,056,337
Members48,442
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1588088 09/22/2025 4:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 327
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 327
Slowly but surely making progress on my 235 swap. Planning to install new crank seal shortly. I've seen recommendations for a Best Gasket brand rubber seal might be best for my application. Do you guys concur? Any other suggestions? It's a 1959 engine.

Thanks
Ron

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,825
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,825
The 59nengine should use the 2 piece rubber seal, not the rope. The dimensions of the groove in the block and cap changed somewhere around late 55 or 56.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 327
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 327
Can, or should, the joints on either type of seal be offset so as to not line up with the cap mating surface? I've seen that being suggested several places.

And sorry for bringing up a topic that I know has been discussed to death. As many threads as I've read, I see all kinds of conflicting info.

Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,848
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Online: Content
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,848
Originally Posted by Hotrod Lincoln
The 59nengine should use the 2 piece rubber seal, not the rope. The dimensions of the groove in the block and cap changed somewhere around late 55 or 56.
Jerry

Right. I should have seen the 1959 year.


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,502
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,502
Please be certain to inspect your sealing surface all the way around. Your engine (no matter when it was made) may have originally had a rope seal or somebody may have used one in it. I have seen two that were newer and had never been rebuilt but had a rope seal...a 1956 and a 1959. If it ever had a rope seal then it is possible there could be roughness, pitting, etc on the crank sealing surface. If there is, then my suggestion would be to use a Speedi-Sleeve back there along with some red loctite to get a nice new surface.

I would try to find an old stock Fel-Pro orange colored rubber seal...maybe on eBay or Etsy. They're discontinued but I don't hold Best Gasket in the same high regard as some. Fel-Pro number was P017176 and Victor Reinz (same seal) was SA737.


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 327
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 327
Jon, thanks for mentioning that. I'll pull the cap tomorrow and check to see what type seal I have and look at the crank surface.

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,224
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,224
Best Gasket is know for their rope material, I build Pontiac motors, a couple every year, Best is the only seal I will install ( rope ). I can't speak for the rubber type, Pontiac only used rope, but it's been said, the grooves for the rope may not be concentric with the bearing surface, with a rope seal, it doesn't matter, with a rubber seal, it makes a big difference.

Last edited by Joe H; 09/24/2025 1:09 PM.
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,502
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,502
The last one I saw was a real mess. So much so I kept pictures of it. It had a rubber seal however when I took it apart I could tell at some point it had a rope seal. The problem with rope seals is that they harbor moisture...a lot if you live in a humid area. If the engine sits without being used that moisture, acid, etc will ruin the rear sealing surface. The rubber seal was so worn it couldn't have sealed anything. Also, it is a good idea to reduce the clearance on your rear main bearing (all mains actually) to as little as possible. You don't want the crank bouncing around unless you have a spring type full seal. Good luck.
Attachments
rearmainendtoend.jpg (15.5 KB, 48 downloads)
ropesealcrankend.jpg (23.76 KB, 49 downloads)


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0