The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 433 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,270
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1511905 08/04/2023 4:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 156
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 156
I have a 38 GMC 1/2 ton that I am changing axles on and want to replace the kneeshock with regular shocks. My problem is I don't know how or where to put the upper shock mounts on my GMC. I know how to fabricate but I am at a total lose for where to start.

Any and all help appreciated


1938 Gmc 1/2 ton
TheShoer #1511919 08/04/2023 9:27 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,830
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,830
Locate the upper brackets so the shocks are at about 45 degrees from vertical. If that's too far away, a bit closer to vertical would work. You'll need to see what shock length is available as well.
If you're planning on doing smokey burnouts, you could locate one shock to the front and one to the rear which would help dampen axle wrap, with each shock providing additional resistance in one direction.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
TheShoer #1511932 08/05/2023 12:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 156
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 156
Thank you, no smoke burn out for me anymore


1938 Gmc 1/2 ton
TheShoer #1511936 08/05/2023 1:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,109
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,109
Maybe this will help. . Also, go to Lmc truck and look at their schematics for other years.This is the schematic. The one thing to remember the front on the picture is to your left. And as pictured that is the right frame rail.

Last edited by WE b OLD; 08/05/2023 1:07 AM.

Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
TheShoer #1511958 08/05/2023 5:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 392
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 392
TheShoer: I have replaced lever shocks with tube shocks on my '47 1/2 ton. I used the Monroe pdf chart to get their part number, which, of course can be cross-referenced to any shock manufacturer at your local FLAPS. The chart has mounting styles, compression, extension and travel distances. Monroe Shock part list. When you click on the link, scroll down a bit to 'Mounting & Length Chart (pdf)'.


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it.
TheShoer #1511971 08/05/2023 1:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
This charts shows the effects of angle mounting shocks. The farther off vertical, the less effect they have. Heavy duty shocks can be leaned over, softer shocks should be more vertical. It's how the manufacturers fine tune the ride.
Attachments
Shocks angle effeciency.jpg (121.53 KB, 155 downloads)

TheShoer #1512271 08/07/2023 10:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,915
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,915
If I don't say anything, am I still wrong?

TheShoer #1512312 08/08/2023 2:12 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
The point we are trying to make is, angles matters, no matter if the math is correct or not. It doesn't surprise me that the chart is wrong, but the idea is still right.

I changed the angle of my shocks from vertical 90*, to about 80*, it made a noticeable difference on the ride. If a fellow had unlimited funds, which I don't, adjustable shocks would be the way to go, you could really dial in the ride quality.

Joe H #1513133 08/15/2023 9:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 156
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 156
Originally Posted by Joe H
This charts shows the effects of angle mounting shocks. The farther off vertical, the less effect they have. Heavy duty shocks can be leaned over, softer shocks should be more vertical. It's how the manufacturers fine tune the ride.


This will help a lot, I just assumed the shocks need it be in a certain position. That chart basically told me.i cen put the mounts anywhere


1938 Gmc 1/2 ton
TheShoer #1513166 08/16/2023 12:53 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,109
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,109
The Shoer, On my 54 they moved the top mount to around 80 degrees and it was ok for a number of years but now that they have weakened I am going to move them back to the original position. The people that did the major part of the work installed them that way, why I don't know.


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.
1954 3100 Chevy truck
In the Gallery
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix
1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 2.155s Queries: 15 (0.032s) Memory: 0.6392 MB (Peak: 0.7398 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 09:27:46 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS