Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (GMCJammer51, Hawkman, Guitplayer, Uncles51, Dennys28, walterhvogel, Ponchogl, WICruiser, 1955 1 Series),
55
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,017 Posts1,055,256 Members48,417 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 | I recently scored a 4.57 third-member from a wrecking yard out of a 69 3/4 ton. That means it has Bendix brakes on an Eaton HO52 axle.
Does anyone know if the brake assembly from said axle will fit on an HO72 that now has Huck brakes? I'd go take some measurements but the yard it 40 miles away. My 14 inch drums are OK but not by much. There are no replacements for the Huck drums, new or used that I've been able to find. I believe that Bendix drums are available. 1951 3800 1-ton"Earning its keep from the get-go"In the DITY Gallery1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2019 Posts: 1,003 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2019 Posts: 1,003 | Not sure on the brake question. But someone will chime in shortly for ya. I did want to mention tho. If the third came out of a 69 ¾ton truck with a v8 and auto trans, it may be a 4.11.  | | | | | Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 | No 4:10. I counted the teeth before I bought it. I can't pull a 4:10 loaded in overdrive. 4.57 times the .83 overdrive gives me about 3.90. So I can pull my big trailer in direct-drive on flat ground or my camper in overdrive. 1951 3800 1-ton"Earning its keep from the get-go"In the DITY Gallery1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,660 Curmudgeon | | Curmudgeon Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,660 | I'm no expert here but there was a previous discussion and it may be of some value. https://www.stovebolt.com/ubbthread...56665/re-3600-rear-axle.html#Post1456665
Last edited by buoymaker; 10/06/2022 8:09 PM.
"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use." "I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM." | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 |
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,775 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,775 | First off, weren't all 52 and newer trucks equipped with Bendix style brakes?
2nd, are you using the complete 69 rearend or just the center section?
Anyhow, I know many of the 67-72 guys use the drums and brake assembly from 14 bolt rearends. I can't give the specifics, but I'm sure there is fabrication involved.
The early trucks had hat style drums, whereas the later ones were pressed on from the rear.
I've played around with HO52 and 14 bolt wheel hubs. They are interchangeable with the appropriate bearings.
Some of the 80's vans had hat style drums, and they weren't as deep as the 14 bolt drums. It may be possible to use something from a van as long as you get the backing plates and misc. Components.
Regardless of what you do, there is going to be some level of fabrication involved. | | | | | Joined: May 2015 Posts: 10,997 Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums | | Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums Joined: May 2015 Posts: 10,997 | First off, weren't all 52 and newer trucks equipped with Bendix style brakes? I looked into that a while back. 1/2 tons converted to Bendix brakes for '51, but the larger trucks had Huck brakes a bit later than that. In '52, 3/4 tons and bigger still had Huck brakes. Can't really tell on '53 models as the page is barely readable in the Vehicle Info Kit (I think the same as in '54). In '54 Bendix were used across the board, except for rear brakes on 4000 and larger trucks.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truckFollow this saga in Project JournalPhotos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 | 1-tons, I know went to Bendix brakes in 52 or 53. There were lots of those axles around stirpped of their brakes years ago. People put then on the earlier trucks. I brought one home thinking it was valuable in about '74. It was still sitting on the property when I sold the lot.
I know the 14-bolt drums are held on by the studs being pressed through them. I didn't know the late HO52s were that way. That makes them a lot harder to work on. I suppose I could get the hubs, backing plates and the whole shebang of the axle and swap it to mine if that would work. I think Greg did some threads on that now that I think about it. I'll look. 1951 3800 1-ton"Earning its keep from the get-go"In the DITY Gallery1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 | Another downside to retaining the HO52 or 72 aside from Huck brakes if that's what you have, is that there are virtually no pinion bearings available. It's a unique bearing with two cones facing each other in a double-sided cup. The last one I saw for sale was for several hundred dollars and that was NOS. 1951 3800 1-ton"Earning its keep from the get-go"In the DITY Gallery1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971. | | |
| |