The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (jay d, Youngin' Tut 59, TooMany2count, 1 invisible), 83 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,139
Posts1,056,754
Members48,454
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Bought a pair of modern style tie rod ends for my '51. They're advertised as 32-59 Car/Truck, and I expected them to be standard tapered shank where they go thru the steering arms, but I was really surprised to find that they are basically straight with a step in the shank. Other oddities (pointing to their source as offshore) are M10x1.5 bolts where they clamp on to the rod, but with 5/8 hex heads (kind of a bastardized bolt). My first clue was the 8.8 marking on the bolt head.
I haven't removed the balls from the steering arm yet, but expected to just be able to use a taper reamer on the holes after removing the balls. I have removed the ball from the pitman arm, which appears to be the same shank size as the tie rod balls (judging from pics in the catalogs), and these tie rod ends flop around in the resulting 5/8" nominal hole.

Has anyone had experience with these? It looks like in order to use them, I'd have to bush the holes in the steering arms. I'm tempted to send them back and go with the original style balls on the steering arms and rebuild kits for the original style tie rod ends.

Here's a pic.
Attachments
IMG_3780.JPG (251.27 KB, 223 downloads)


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,504
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,504
Kevin, maybe 10 or 12 years ago I bought tie rod ends made by MOOG (USA) that looked similar to what you just received. MOOG was closing them out (can't recall what they were to fit originally), but they would work fine on the AD trucks if you made bushings for them and the price was right. That is what I did and haven't had any problem. As I recall, the hole was .625" and the shaft was .5625". I used a piece of thin wall conduit tube slit and bent to fit...think I had to reduce the OD a bit. I also put a washer on top where the shaft met the shoulder. Good luck.


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 452
H
'Bolter
'Bolter
H Offline
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 452
Mine fit the holes after driving out the peened in ones, if only just ok when tightened up, when i spoke to my machinist he recommended going taper tie rod ends. (I just dont argue with a race car builder/machinist' recommendation, they see everything through a high stress environment lense)
i went with SpeedwayMotors Ford ends, they had more range of motion on the up/down (y)axis than the ones you have, important on the drag link front location (not relevant on tie rod as that operates only in x axis) if you go this piece by piece route dont forget to order the jam nuts (dont ask).

i bought "Speedway 11/16 Inch Raw Tie Rod/Drag Link Tubing" to use for new tie rod, and 2nd shorter length to make a adjustable drag link.(also bought RH tap from them so i could tune the lengths)

I liked that top part of the ford tie rod taper is narrower than GM ones, less material removed when reaming. BTW he did not taper to the bottom of the holes.......stopped at least 1/8-3/16 short, so taper short & check fit, too deep reduces y axis rotation.....and threads might extend lower out bottom that you might need a fat washer


Hank: 46 Chev 1/2ton shortbed
2023 Miata RF Club
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Thanks for the Speedway suggestion. These look interesting. They're 7 degree taper studs and the same 1/2-20 thread on the end, but the question is the diameter of the taper right next to the threads. Looks like it might be 5/8-inch diameter, but not shown. That would allow the steering arms to be reamed to fit the taper. The rod threads are smaller though, so the original tie rod would have to be turned down and rethreaded to match. They also have an extended length one that's closer to the ones I bought.
I'll need to do a bit more investigation.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
I used a set like you purchased and had no problems with fit. I bought my from https://www.bowtiebits.com/index.cfm The straight shank is a direct replacement for the press in balls. No shims or bushings required.

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 119
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 119
Great discussion here about the need to pay attention to detail with aftermarket and retrofit parts.

In the original post Kevin noted that the bolt was metric but with an inch size head.

My thinking is that it is a true metric M10x1.5 Class 8.8 Capscrew. It has a 16 mm hex head. Across the globe you will find M10 cap screws with either 14mm, 15 mm, 16 mm, or 17 mm hex head based on the standard used in that country.

Note that 5/8” is 15.88 mm. So a 5/8 wrench or socket is a very nice fit on a nominal size 16 mm hex head. I often use inch tools on metric or metric tools on inch hex heads when I want to slightly tighter fit.

For example, yesterday I used a 14 mm crow’s foot wrench to torque the 2 center 9/16” headed bolts on the manifold of my ‘37. I do not own an inch set of crow’s foot wrenches and the 14 mm fit snuggly on the 9/16” head (14.28 mm).

Last edited by TBUChevy; 03/10/2021 5:37 PM. Reason: Added 14mm

Rusty
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,198
Insomniac
Insomniac
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,198
You should be able to use the 3/4 ton tie rods ends on your 1/2 ton. Probably have to do some reaming and you will need the matching tie rod. My 1/2 ton came with the 3/4 ton tie rod and tie rod ends. (might be something they did on trucks built in Canada)


Gord 🇨🇦
----
1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
@TBUChevy, I know about some interchangeability between metric and inch size bolt heads, but don't have a 16mm wrench, so assumed it was a 5/8 head. I've never run across a 10MM metric bolt with a 16mm head or I would have had that size wrench. Thanks for the info.

@Joe H, I may find that they fit OK, but haven't gotten the worn balls off the steering arms yet. I had never seen a non-tapered tie rod end before.

@Gord, Thanks for that info. I might see if I can drum up a 3/4 ton tie rod and go that way.

Thanks all for the input.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
You will find the hole in the arms after you remove the ball ends to be more hourglass shaped then straight. The hourglass gives the metal a place to go when they peen them over, this also makes removing them a little tough. If you go to drilling, don't go past 1/2" or the new ones won't fit. Drill the bottom out to relieve the peening process, then knock them out.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Got the steering arms off yesterday and today finally got the tie-rod ends loose and off the balls.

A burning question for you guys. Do you think I can reuse the balls? Here's an example of one and the corresponding cup from the tie rod end. wink
Attachments
IMG_3787.JPG (242.56 KB, 104 downloads)
IMG_3788.JPG (114.39 KB, 103 downloads)


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
If the ball is not round, the heavy springs in the matting part compressed and expand as you turn, this cause the driver to work harder each time. With round balls, the springs stay at a constant pressure. Also note in the second picture where to cup has dug into the stem of the ball. This is normal wear and needs to be addressed.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Yep one of the springs was broken as well. This is going to be addressed by tossing the old ends in the scrap pile. The balls are coming out. I’ve got replacement balls for the drag link but going with the modern style tie rod ends.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 452
H
'Bolter
'Bolter
H Offline
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 452
removing the ball was no big deal, i used the youtube method shown by Brothers Truck parts,


ie: cutting wheel on grinder to cut off the ball flush with arm, them put arm over a socket & drive/punch the shank out from the ball end down with a 5lb sledge, 3 hits to get it moving then out she slid.


Hank: 46 Chev 1/2ton shortbed
2023 Miata RF Club
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,504
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,504
The drag link (as you already know) can be made using new style parts. One of the parts suggested for this has become very hard (if not impossible) to find, but there are workarounds using different parts and you can either use the MOOG search using dimensions, threads, etc or call MOOG. The man I talked to there (about 4 or 5 years ago) was very helpful, impressively well informed and had good ideas for substitution possibilities. Sounded to me like he had done similar work himself. Aside from easy adjustment, one nice thing is if the parts wear, you can replace them much more easily. And they're sealed so dust, dirt, water, salt, snow, etc isn't the same problem. And there is zero play once you do this. I expected the new parts might make steering easier, but honestly I can't say they did. Feels about the same from that aspect.

What I learned about the replacement balls available when I did this (mid 90s) was they are nowhere near as hard as the originals were. In fact I think they were nothing more than mild steel. They certainly wore out in a hurry. Good luck!


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,228
If you know a good machinist, have them cut you left and right hand threads in some strong bar stock then use two more of the modern tie-rod ends for an easy to adjust draglink. You end up with four sealed ends that match. An alternative to machining a new bar is to find a second long tie-rod end bar, cut it down to draglink size saving the left hand threaded end. Buy a die for right hand thread cutting and thread the other end.

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,450
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,450
klhansen Those balls are probably worn out of round,you adjust then when you turn they get tighter.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,120
Got all the balls out today and discovered that the tie rod ends I bought will work just fine. The drag link ball on the left steering arm was a little stubborn and didn't want to move with the ball joint press, so had to break out the O/A torch. A couple seconds of heat and it popped loose. Got the replacement drag link balls pressed in place and peened over as the originals were, so things are working out well. And yes, the original balls were more egg shaped than spherical.
Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
Attachments
IMG_3799.JPG (278.35 KB, 52 downloads)


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0