Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,113 Posts1,056,277 Members48,439 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 | Hello all. I need to clear up a discussion I'm having with my dad about pilot bearings. I understand that the pilot bearing in the rear end of the crankshaft is different for manual vs. automatic transmissions. Here's my question: if you have a motor that is mated to an automatic, to swap over to a manual transmission do you have to change the crankshaft to get the correct size pilot bearing installed, or can you just change the bearing? I've watched videos that show how to change a pilot bearing without removing the crank, but they're always dealing with automatic transmissions only.
Brian
Brian
'51 Chevy 3604 Project '28 Chevy LO basket case '83 GMC Sierra 4x4
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,315 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,315 | I always thought engines that are mated to a auto trans don’t have a pilot bushing therefore if you put a Manuel trans in you have to makesure there is a bushing in the end of the crank. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,363 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,363 | Brian, the following is based on my admitted limited experience and does not necessarily apply to today's engines, only what's now commonly referred to as the classics. Many crankshafts were drilled for a pilot shaft/bearing/bushing regardless of automatic or manual transmission.
I do know some manufactures (Mopar big blocks) have a hub hole in the crank for the torque converter that can be used with a special bearing and shortened pilot shaft without any additional drilling. Again with Mopar's, if they came with a manual transmission then drilled for a pilotshaft. If originally a automatic car, might be drilled for a pilotshaft, or not. However it's possible to drill the crank while it's in the car if required to accommodate a standard transmission input shaft. Not hard to do with a good appropriately sized bit and drill. Fancy folks use a jig to insure perfection.
Good Luck,
RonR
Last edited by moparguy; 12/24/2020 12:03 PM.
RonR
1951 3600 with Clark flatbed, T5, 4.10 rear 1970 340 Duster 1990 5.0 V8 Miata (1990 Mustang Gt Drivetrain) 1964 CJ5
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 | Most cranks come drilled for a pilot bushing or bearing. Drilling a crank in the block is not acceptable, crank would need to be set up, not a normal procedure. Automatics do not come with pilot bushings, torque converter registers in flywheel since they always turn.
Pilot bushings, bronze or brass are easily made or bought. Pilot bearings are easily bought, however, when they fail, they frequently damage the input shaft which may or may not be replaceable, especially on an older vehicle.
If one is changing from automatic trans. to manual, one must always check to make crank is drilled, might be necessary to get another crank if not drilled.
Ed
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 | Thank you all for the replies. I really appreciate the input (no pun intended)! I'm venturing into uncharted territories with my project, but really enjoying learning new stuff.
It had not ocurred to me that the crankshaft (in an older motor, like a 235) would be drilled for a pilot bushing regardless of which transmission it was mated to.
In my case, I have a later model 250 (non running) mated to a Turbo 350 in my '51 Chevy project. I acquired a 4-speed SM 420 a while ago to replace the auto. I haven't pulled the motor and trans out of the truck yet so I haven't seen the rear end of the crank. My dad commented that I may have to replace the crankshaft. I was planning to rebuild the 250 but just discovered it has freeze damage so now I'm looking at a replacement. I wanted to be sure, when I go look at another motor, that I wasn't getting one that needed a new crankshaft. Long story short, as long as the crank is drilled for a pilot bushing I'm ok.
Many thanks again, and Merry Christmas!
Brian
Brian
'51 Chevy 3604 Project '28 Chevy LO basket case '83 GMC Sierra 4x4
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,805 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,805 | I have machined a crankshaft for an AMC V8 while it was installed in the engine, but we stood the engine up on the harmonic balancer, leveled it in all directions, and used a precision boring head in a radial drill press to machine an accurate hole. That one was set up for a different torque converter since the year of the engine didn't match the vehicle it was being mated with. AMC had swapped from a Borg-Warner transmission to a Torqueflite, and the TF had a different converter snout dimension. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,219 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,219 | The 250/292 crank is very likely drilled for the bushing/bearing even though it may have an automatic trans hooked to it. When machining the crankshafts, they operators didn't know what transmission it was going to be hooked to. Only the special HP engines used special crankshafts, the other 99.9% of engines used standard pieces. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,652 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,652 | The one thing I will add here is that with GM motors, for a little while GM used two different crankshafts. One for auto and one for stick. A pilot bearing can be installed in either crank but the back of the crank was machined at two different sizes. I have come across this more often with early small block chevys, never with a 235. Not sure if the 230-292 motors ever had that difference but its no problem though as pilot bushings are made for both size holes. Order the standard bushing. It should require a good bit of press to install it. If it just slides or pushes in, you need the larger bearing.
In terms of material for the pilot bushing, the cheap auto part bushings are frequently steel or some other ferrous material. Run away. Other inexpensive versions are bronze but just plain old bronze. Hold out for a real Oilite bushing. I am pretty sure I have this right, the Oilite material was developed back in the 30s and remains the gold standard for pilot bushing material for our old motors. It is an oil impregnated sintered bronze. It oozes oil and lubricates the input shaft tip. Do not grease the inside of this bearing. Do not grease the tip of the input shaft. You seal up the pores and it wont ooze oil as it should. I make it a point to obtain the real McCoy and over 40 years later, no pilot bushing failures, and I am not easy on my motors or transmissions.
Other then that, I think you are good to go!
Mike
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 | Thanks again for the added information. Mike, I read up on the different pilot bushings/bearings this morning and learned about the Oilite bronze bushings as you mentioned. I can see how that would be the right choice.
Earlier today I met up with a guy selling a motor on Offer Up near me. He had it listed as a 265, though I suspected he meant it was either a 261 or 235. As it turned out, according to the block number it is a '50-'52 235, a rather appropriate choice for my '51 truck. The best part is, upon a close inspection (removed the valve cover and looked in the fuel pump hole) the motor appears to have been remanufactured in the past and then mothballed. All of the openings (spark plug holes, etc.) have purpose-made plugs. The valve springs look new; everything is super clean. Other than a light film, there is no oil on anything. It appears I got a zero mileage motor for $100. It even has a new clutch pack on the flywheel. The pilot bearing appears to be a later style roller bearing, not a basic scintered bronze bushing. I plan to get the motor onto a stand Saturday so I can inspect it thoroughly.
Brian
'51 Chevy 3604 Project '28 Chevy LO basket case '83 GMC Sierra 4x4
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,652 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,652 | Post a photo of that bearing if you can. If it is a true roller pilot bearing in the crank, you will want to remove it and replace it with a regular bushing. Those roller pilot bearings are hardened and can really damage and/or wear out the tip of the input shaft. Really designed for road racing.
Mike
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2019 Posts: 157 | Post a photo of that bearing if you can. If it is a true roller pilot bearing in the crank, you will want to remove it and replace it with a regular bushing. Those roller pilot bearings are hardened and can really damage and/or wear out the tip of the input shaft. Really designed for road racing. Agreed. After doing some research, and hearing the advice on this forum, I plan to replace it with an Oilite scintered bronze bushing.
Brian
'51 Chevy 3604 Project '28 Chevy LO basket case '83 GMC Sierra 4x4
| | |
| |