Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,095 Posts1,056,069 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 23 | Sorry if this is addressed somewhere else but I could not find it in a search.
I have a 1954 GMC 1 ton or 3/4 ton (not sure) but it has the long box on it. I am wondering wich s10 frame I would use for it since I can't find what the original frame length is. Thanks
Darren | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,068 | You know, if you put an S10 frame under your truck, it won't have 3/4 ton or 1 ton hauling/towing capabilities anymore? Scott | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Measure the wheelbase to determine if its a 3/4- or 1-ton.
GMC offered 1/2-ton trucks in both short and long wheelbase. So a 1/2-ton GMC could have either 116 or 125 inch wheelbase. Chevy did not sell long wheelbase 1/2-tons, but GMC did.
A 3/4-ton or 1-ton will have 8-lug hubs while the 1/2-ton will have 6-lug.
So if it has 8 lugs and a 125 inch wheelbase, its a 3/4-ton. If it has 8 lugs and a 137 inch wheelbase its a 1-ton.
If it really is a 1-ton you might want to trade it off on another because lots of people want that long box 1-ton pickup.
Once you know the wheelbase you can look for an S-10 that is close to a match.
Scott is right, you are giving up your load rating if you swap to a S-10 frame and suspension.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Apr 2001 Posts: 439 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2001 Posts: 439 | Darren, I talked to a fellow just last night at a local car meet who has a '52 chev one ton. He put it on a '75 1/2 ton 2wd chev lwb frame, bagged it and put a 383 stroker in it. It was long and low. His front wheels stuck out maybe an inch as the full size crossmember is to wide. Didn't look bad though. Might be worth checking into more. Good Luck. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 | I don't think there was an S-10 that long. Don't they say the regular cab longbed is just right for a 1/2 ton AD (116"). DForbes, there are lots of post on this forum about the S10 swap and a link somewhere to the AD Engineering website. Could be some useful info there. And I suppose there are some S-10 websites out there that might have info about all wheelbases offered. Good luck!
Professional Novice
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | S-10s were offered in the following wheelbases-regular cab short box-108.3-regular cab long box-117.9-extnded cab short box-122.9. There was no long box option for the extended cab.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 | Most people seem to think the original AD 1/2-ton wheel base is about 1" too short for the body: the rear tire crowds the front edge of the fender. That S-10 wheelbase of 117.9 is about 2" longer. I guess a little fudging both ways could make that set pretty good, or add about an inch between cab and bed?? DForbes if you have a 1-ton with 137" WB the bed is 9' long and I think is so cool. In high demand, too. Have you verified which it is?
Professional Novice
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 145 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: May 2005 Posts: 145 | I'm not sure about the 4wd, but my 91 S10 2WD frame had lots of straight frame rail under the cab, which made it *very* easy to lengthen using 5 inch wide heavy steel channel. The channel fit so nice & snug in the S10 rails, that I could extend and retract it while fitting up my 1-ton long wheelbase panel body. There are pics on my page. For my 46, the full size newer truck frames put the tires out too far. I'd much rather have them in the wells, to be able to lower it if needed. The 4WD rear end is a little (4inches) wider than the 2WD unit and bolts right in. The 2WD rear rubbed the inside of the tires on the body. I did sort of a step-by-step on the page in my sig line. I will be adding more soon. I am hooked on the idea of transplanting S10 frames now. Cheers, MV | | | | | Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 6 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 6 | I am in the middle of the swap, i have a 1951 chevy 3600 long bed wb. 125" and I am using a 1992 extended cab short bed S10 wb 122". the differnet is the least with this set up, I plan to just move the rear fenders forward a bit to compinsate for the difference, i also plan to move it a bit more forward to make up the already forwaard offset from the factory. If you have the long bed 3600 it should have 3 stake supports, you will need to remove the center support to move the fenders forward. you will have to cut the running boards down also. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 4 | I plan to do this for my 48. Is there a tech paper written? Any shared experience on this would be helpful.
After exploring the options, I think this will be the easiest and most cost effective. Brakes, suspension, steering, it's already there. The only major problems I can forsee is to make the brackets, find a place for the power brake booster, and the rad support. I have a 48 3600, but I will find a 3100 box.
1948 3600 (I think) Sat in the bush for over 30 years until I rescued it.
| | |
| |