The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (ShopRag, DaveV), 97 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,024
Posts1,055,395
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#133391 12/11/2005 6:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
J
Junior Member
Junior Member
J Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
Hi all,
I have noticed lots of people adding V8s to their old trucks.
I'm assuming that the whole drive line as well as the front clip and suspension would need changed as well. Is there a good book or website that shows a conversion like this?

Thanks!
-Jason

#133392 12/11/2005 10:01 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
You dont have to redo the suspension,but it makes a lot nicer conversion.Mine has a 350 engine,700R4 tranny,mustang ll frontend and stock rearend.really the only hard thing is just figuring out what kind of motor mounts,crossmembers,etc.to use.I dont know of any specific books,but you can always look thru the truck mags.They usually have interesting articles on conversions.And of course when you have a specific question,you can always post it here.Someone will steer you in the right direction.A lot of the people here are deadset against V/8 s in the old Chevy trucks.I prefer the streetrod approach myself,just my opinion.Its sorta nice cruisin down the freeway in the fastlane in an old truck.

#133393 12/12/2005 12:43 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 439
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 439
Quote
Originally posted by dale937:
Its sorta nice cruisin down the freeway in the fastlane in an old truck.
a dream of many...just v-things aren't always the answer wink

#133394 12/12/2005 1:08 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
Quote
A lot of the people here are deadset against V/8 s in the old Chevy trucks.
True. But a lot of the comments here are about the fact that most of the V-8 conversions are crate 350 Chevies. They are like a-holes.

Be creative. What about a 389 or 421 Pontiac tri-power? Or a Chrysler firedome hemi? Or a..........? There are plenty of options. Why live like the other 95%?

And as Colin sez, You don't have to have 8 cylinders to keep up.


"It's just a phase. He'll grow out of it." Mama, 1964

1956 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
1953 Chevy 6100 "The Yard dog"
1954 GMC Suburban Now with a new proud owner.
#133395 12/12/2005 1:53 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
M
Junior Member
Junior Member
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
I agree with wanting to have something different. I am going to swap the motor in my 38' pickup.. was thinking of going with a 302, but finding a decent one for a decent price is going to be hard, that plus the fact that there is basically NO aftermarket for it has steered me towards looking again at the already built 350 sitting in my shop.. *sigh*

#133396 12/12/2005 10:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
L
Junior Member
Junior Member
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
A 350 chevy is very common, that's a good thing! After market parts are plentiful and cheap! You can't build cheaper horsepower. I am putting 77 chevy IFS under my 52 and I'm leaning toward a 388 stroker (350 with stroker crank and bored .060 over). I know it won't be a show stopper, but it will be a riot on the street!


Wild Turkey Time
#133397 12/13/2005 12:11 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
350s are cheap, but boring. A 250 or 292 L22 6 will use quite a few of the same parts. Even my 350 equipped Corvette isn't keeping it - it's getting a 400 SBC.


Get a REAL truck, get a GMC! www.oldgmctrucks.com
1954 GMC De Luxe COE
#133398 12/13/2005 4:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,068
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,068
Most of us build on a budget and can't afford the exotic stuff. After all, I have several trucks to maintain. We are after the most bang for the buck and the small block Chevy is the answer. I don't build to impress anyone, I could care less what anyone thinks of my trucks. I just want them on the road and being used as they were intended. My "different" powered truck has a 454 in it. It's still not as cheap to buy parts for but it's a close second.
There's my opinion, right or wrong,
Scott


Scott Ward

2 1948 1.5-ton Loadmasters
The red one and The snow pusher
1 1950 3100
1 1955.1 Chevy 6500
1 1954 Chevy 6500 2-Ton
1 1955 1st Series COE 5700
1 1963 K20 (454)
1 1964 C10 (350)
1 1951 1.5-ton Dump Truck
1953 and a 1956 Ford F800

Raising a teenager is like trying to nail Jello to a tree!
#133399 12/14/2005 4:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 68
5
New Guy
New Guy
5 Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 68
I planted a 350 in my 1950 3/4 ton. Like 48bigtrucks said, small blocks are inexpensive and parts are plentiful. Mine was an easy drop in with the Chevy Duty small block engine and tranny mount kits. Just make sure you mount it in the proper location. I have about 2 inches clearance between the cab and HEI distributor, and about 5" between the water pump pully and radiator. If you search the forums you'll find posts giving location dimensions. That's how I determined where to locate mine.

#133400 12/20/2005 2:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,554
I definitly prefer the 350 to the old boat anchors.Plentiful yes.Boring HE-- NO.Easy to get parts for yes.Driving in the fast lane,I do it all the time,with my 55.It all depends on what you are trying to accomplish.You guys stick with the boat anchors,and I will go with the V/8s.

#133401 12/20/2005 3:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 221
V
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
V Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 221
I like the six but if i was going to V8 i would use a 35/403 or 455 Olds they will fit into an old truck better than a chevy v8 and have more torque and also get as good or better fuel milage

#133402 12/20/2005 4:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
M
Junior Member
Junior Member
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
I would love to have a high performance six; or an "exotic" V-8. but the reality is cost. 350's are the cheapest to build into high horsepower motors. ;(

#133403 12/20/2005 6:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
What I'd like to do is to pull the 465 Pontiac out of my Firebird and replace it with an aluminum Pontiac engine displacing over 500 cubic inches, and then put the 465 in my truck. The only issue stopping me is adapting the SM-420 to the BOP bolt pattern. Well that and money.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird
#133404 12/29/2005 6:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 209
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 209
Im putting an LS1 with a 4sp auto in my 57. It will be fuel injected have plenty of horsepower and still knock down 24 mpg. I wanted to try new tech in an older vehicle after running carbs for so long. Of course my truck was already modified and didnt have the original engine. But down the road if I get something with a six in it I may decide to build it for somthing different and cool. But I still say you can get more bang for your buck in a V-8.

#133405 12/29/2005 6:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
Does the LS1 have the same bolt pattern as the old "boring" 350? Or do you have to adapt the bellhousing somehow for the 4 speed?

Leo Sanducci seems to have inline 6's figured out to make big power. He gets 1000 hp out of a 292 that runs 10's in a Studebaker. But I'm almost certain his engine cost a small fortune to build like that. And I guess it's possible to bolt a roots supercharger on an inline 6 of some type. I saw a supercharger intake on e-bay, but they wanted a LOT of money for it. A lot of other people here manage to get upwards of 300 horsepower and over 400 lb-ft of torque on theirs, but then again they've rebuilt them with some modern technology.

I like the stovebolt engine too. But nothing beats a 350 in bang for the buck. It is such a good compromise between power and economy that you can actually have a LOT more power and still get better fuel economy over a stovebolt with one. There is a reason Chevy 350's are so common, because they are so good. However, there are a lot of other really cool V8's too, such as the Pontiac tri-power, Chevy big block, TPI 350's, and 409's to name a few.
And a shiny roots blower on top of a 350 would make it anything but boring.

There's a lot of options, it comes down to personal taste.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird
#133406 12/29/2005 8:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Quote
Originally posted by Hot Rod Dad:
There's a lot of options, it comes down to personal taste.
That's a statement I can agree with!

Walking through a car show seeing a small block under every hood sure does get old. But if you are building one truck on a budget its hard to beat a 350 Chevy on any basis.

But if you keep your eyes and mind open, other options could come along that are budget friendly. I have a 430 Buick I was given a few years ago and not long ago I drove home a 454 powered motorhome for free.

Bargin motors are out there, you just need to be patient.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
#133407 12/29/2005 8:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
I'll tell you what would make an excellent as well as eye-catching motor in a truck is a tuned port 350 out of a late-80's Corvette or F-body. Especially if it has the excellent 700R4 attached to it.

This is an extremely torquey motor that will pull up to 400 lb-ft at about 3000 rpm if you cam it right and improve the compression with steel shim head gaskets. And with the 700R4, you can cruise at just above idle. I get 22 mpg with mine in the IROC, cruising on the highway.
They clean up nice with either paint on the runners and upper plenum, or a good polishing job.

I've seen the combo at swap meets for as low as $800, which is really a bargain.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird
#133408 12/29/2005 9:00 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,271
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,271
I think there's a real good reason for seeing so many 350 sbc's ... I've got one in mine with a mild cam and a 4bbl Edelbrock 600cfm carb, Mustang II IFS, 11-inch mid-70s Monte Carlo front disc brakes, mid-70s Chevy 12-bolt rear, 350 TH trans ... I'm in the fast lane when I need to be and, boring? I can't imagine what you mean! The 350 is fun to play with, fun to listen to ... and when I stomp on the gas pedal I usually crack up laughing!

A matter of choice, indeed.


~~ Alan Horvath
1954 Chevy Pickup
Singing his praises in the
Passing Lane
#133409 12/30/2005 5:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 866
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 866
We just swapped out a 360 AMC engine from our 53 with a 350zz4 crate engine. The PO had a jeep driveline in the 53. The 360 ran great, but parts were hard to come by, and very expensive. We did a lot of searching and reading before we went to the 350. It seemed to be the best solution both expense and parts wise. Just my opinion though!

#133410 12/30/2005 5:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 364
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 364
I have a new GM 350 crate in my '49 Burb...with Heidt IFS, Discs on all four,headers,Edelbrock 600cfm carb,Dual Flowmasters,HEI mated to a B&M 700R4 and a 3.55 rear... it is a 57 year old rocket! and a ball to drive.


Steve G.
--------------
1942 Chevrolet 1/2-Ton Pickup Truck

#133411 01/01/2006 4:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 40
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 40
I just started lookiing in here....

My 2-3/5 cents:

SBC motors are plentiful and cheap. There's all sorts of aftermarket parts available, which makes them cheap as well.
Boring? Depends on how you build the motor, I'd think.

I wouldn't think of dropping a Hemi or a 351 or even a 427 Cobra Jet in our '54. Why? They're all quality motors that can be built to any level of performance you want. Because they are not Chevy motors, plain and simple. Frankly, I don't like the idea of putting a motor of another make in any hotrod. To me it just seems... well... wrong.
Now if you're making a rodded-out Hudson or something, you've got a situation. There's not a lot of options, so going with a SBC or BBC or anything else makes sense for that rare a project.


Tilt your head back, cuz Mama Bird is going to ram a juicy nightcrawler of truth down your throat!

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0