The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Nick in Manitou, Wayne67vert, 1955 1 Series, Oswald, Woodcmiami, MRMEROTH11), 147 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,124
Posts1,056,334
Members48,439
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1330615 10/21/2019 3:19 AM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Hey All,
On Friday I just received my new tie-rod and ends for my 48' 1/2ton. The tie-rod seems to be too big for the threads of the new ends.
It took all of my strength to get as far as you see in the pic...I called LMC yesterday, and I told the lady what was happening. She looked it up, and stated that there was a previous customer in the logs with a similar concern, and tech-support informed him that spreading the ends a little will help. Doesn't seem correct to me, but just a feeling. You can already start to see it flaring just two threads in...Have any of you run into this?
By the way, the rod they sent stated is was for 47-56' and is a heavier duty rod then original. Appreciate the feedback. Thanks Steve
Attachments
untitled.jpg (30.78 KB, 254 downloads)


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,072
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,072
I'll bet that someone at the factory got a bit aggressive tightening the clamp bolt on the tie rod end and squished it so it's too small to easily thread onto the rod.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Both left and right are exactly the same way. I cleaned all threads, and neither clamp bolt is tight.


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Most likely they are a "miss-fit" in design and in manufacturing (for 47-55st, at least)?

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Do you have the old ends and rod to try? You could narrow it down which is the offender. it maybe the rod thread that’s too big.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Good suggestions, Phak1 - the tie-rod might not be original?

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,072
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,072
Originally Posted by tclederman
the tie-rod might not be original?
In the OP's pic, the tie rod appears to be brand-spanking new, as is the end pictured. Could also be a thread pitch issue.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
Maybe it is just the lighting but the first few threads appear to be wiped. That could happen if the threads didn't match.


1951 GMC 1 Ton Flatbed -- It is finally on the road and what a great time I have driving it!
1951 1 Ton Completed


My Chevy Master 4 Door is on the Road!
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
The tie-rods ends are designed to CLAMP only....not spread and clamp. Providing the tie-rod is OEM correct dia. and as mentioned above correct thread pitch. I also concur that the first thread or two is wiped.

Last edited by Apache1; 10/21/2019 10:03 PM.
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Hey Guys - The threads are crisp. Both ends of the new rod have a flat starting portion, and I could see how the pic makes it look like wiped threads. My original rod was damaged and has frozen ends, but I did grab a quick measurement of the old thread heights for a comparison. Bummer as its a nice rod... Steve
Attachments
rod1.jpg (30.89 KB, 195 downloads)
rod 2.jpg (26.8 KB, 201 downloads)
rod3.jpg (31.87 KB, 191 downloads)


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
This may be a stupid question, but are you sure you didn’t mix them up? One tie rod end is a left hand thread to match the rod. Just a thought!


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Hey Phil - Not a stupid question at all. but no, they are on the correct ends. Both sides are just as tight...Steve


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,281
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,281
Take the bolts out. Take a large cold chisel to use as a wedge and strike with a MFH (Medium Force Hammer smile ) to spread the ears out until you have enough slack to easily thread it on.
I have had to do this with crusty original ends and shafts to get them to go on smoothly.
What do you have to lose? If it doesn't work, send them back. No one will know any difference. I will make my standard bet of 1 dozen donuts that you won't need to send them back.
Carl

Last edited by 52Carl; 10/22/2019 3:06 AM.

1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A couple of things. It appears you are roughly .006 to .007 heavier on the OD new rod vs. old. Secondly, if memory serves I believe the rod ends are left and right hand threads.

Once again attempting to flare the casting of the rod end should NOT be attempted. Think for a minute. Even if you could get the rod started say a thread or two then what. Its still a smaller (tapered) opening as you attempt to thread the rod any further.

IMHO, you have mis-matched parts. And in today's aftermarket world that would not be a shocking surprise.

Last edited by Apache1; 10/22/2019 11:43 AM.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
T
Crusty Old Sarge
Crusty Old Sarge
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
You stated that the Tie Rod is Heavy Duty, are you sure it's not a 3/4 or 1 ton part number? I have the LMC Tie Rod and Ends on my 59' ( I know yours is an AD) both are the Heavy Duty and fit together great.


~ Craig
1958 Viking 4400
"The Book of Thor"
Read the story in the DITY
1960 Chevrolet C10
"A Family Heirloom"
Follow the story in the DITY Gallery
'59 Apache 31, 327 V8 (0.030 over), Muncie M20 4 Speed, GM 10 Bolt Rear... long term project (30 years and counting)

If you don't like driving yourTruck, you won't drive yourTruck..| Living life in the SLOW lane
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 216
T
I have more zippers then a pair of cargo pants
I have more zippers then a pair of cargo pants
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by TUTS 59
You stated that the Tie Rod is Heavy Duty, are you sure it's not a 3/4 or 1 ton part number? I have the LMC Tie Rod and Ends on my 59' ( I know yours is an AD) both are the Heavy Duty and fit together great.

TUTS is correct, I have a 1/2 & 1 ton front axle && I took a mic to them. The 1/2ton drag link is 1/2 inch & the one tons (not sure about 3/4) is 1 inch. That has to be the problem.. He either needs the tie rod ends for the 1/2ton or a drag link from a 1ton to use those tie rod ends....joe

Last edited by TooMany2count; 10/22/2019 3:23 PM.

~ Joe
Donate Blood, Plasma, Platelets and Sign Your DONORS CARD. The Life You SAVE Might Be Someone You Know and LOVE.
Two possibilities exist: Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying. ~ Arthur C. Clarke
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,195
Insomniac
Insomniac
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,195
There was a similar thread on this topic last August:
https://www.stovebolt.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/1321092/1.html

Tim posted a link to the parts book on the old car manual site. According to the book (as I read it), the tie rod is supposed to have 3/4 - 16 threads and the tie rod ends are supposed to have 25/32 - 16 threads.

headscratch



Gord 🇨🇦
----
1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Thanks All...I confirmed the ends say 1/2 ton in the LMC description. The tie-rod part just has a year range for 1st series.

Thanks Gord for adding the link with thread intel. I'm going to go check that out...
Attachments
diagram.jpg (45.74 KB, 122 downloads)
tierod.jpg (23.13 KB, 121 downloads)


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Measuring the OD of the rod isn’t going to tell you much because that is not telling you if the thread was cut deep enough. You would need to measure the root of the thread on the rod and the ID of the thread on the tie rod ends to give you any idea if it is going to work. Tough to do without the right tools. They make micrometers to do just that but is cost prohibitive. Not many of us have taps and dies in that size, not to mention you would also need them in left hand configuration.

You could try as Fox suggested to spread the tie rod ends a bit or just send them back and either get another set from LMC or try another vendor.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A thread gauge would be beneficial.

Why do you all insist on telling him to spread the rod end....that's just not kosher.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,281
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,281
Originally Posted by Apache1
A thread gauge would be beneficial.

Why do you all insist on telling him to spread the rod end....that's just not kosher.
Because it works. Those clamp ends are not brittle.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
Not on any of my hot-rods!

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,195
Insomniac
Insomniac
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,195
I wonder how much a local machine shop would charge to make a tie rod. Tell them you need a 3/4" bar of the proper length, threaded both ends. Give them the tie rod ends and tell them that they have to fit.


Gord 🇨🇦
----
1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
T
Crusty Old Sarge
Crusty Old Sarge
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
There must be something wrong with the tie rod, I still think you were sent the wrong part. The warehouse may have miss marked the part. I would return the tie rod and request an exchange.


~ Craig
1958 Viking 4400
"The Book of Thor"
Read the story in the DITY
1960 Chevrolet C10
"A Family Heirloom"
Follow the story in the DITY Gallery
'59 Apache 31, 327 V8 (0.030 over), Muncie M20 4 Speed, GM 10 Bolt Rear... long term project (30 years and counting)

If you don't like driving yourTruck, you won't drive yourTruck..| Living life in the SLOW lane
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,221
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,221
Take the right hand threaded tie-rod end to the hardware store and see if it will thread on to a standard 3/4 - 16 bolt. If it does, the rod is wrong, if it won't, the ends are wrong. They should thread on each other with no tools needed, all mine have.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Do the same with the tie rod and a nut. Great suggestion Joe H!


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,221
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,221
I have a left and right hand tap for 3/4-16 and two NOS tie-rod ends. Both taps screw right in the tie-rods with no tools needed. The hole in the tie-rod measures .730", taps OD measure .750.

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Per Joe & Phil's comments, I just went to the hardware store. Both nut and bolt are 3/4-16. Looks like the tie-rod ends are a keeper and the rod goes back!
Thanks All Steve...
Attachments
image1 (15).jpeg (23.95 KB, 79 downloads)
image1 (16).jpeg (49.31 KB, 79 downloads)
image2 (11).jpeg (28.99 KB, 77 downloads)


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Is the original rod bent? If not you can most likely get the tie rod ends off the existing rod by cutting the bolts off with a hack saw (if you can’t coax them off with penetrant, heat or both) and as 52Carl suggested, use a cold chisel in the the slot to expand the thread. Use some penetrating oil to help break the rust bond. I used that same procedure on my ‘52 and was able to save the parts and just install the rebuild kit. They were pretty crusty but after cleaning and painting looked new.
Attachments


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,644
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,644
Usually the most simple test solves our mystery. This thread should remind us all to start with the most simple things before we jump through all the hoops trying to fix something. This was a good teachable moment!


Chuck
1950 Chevy 1/2 ton (all original)
1951 Chevy 1/2 ton (future streetrod)
1941 Chevy coupe
1938 Chevy coupe streetrod
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
Phil - Yep, unfortunately the original tie-rod has a few bends, or I would do as you and 52 suggested...

Chuck - Totally agree...Perfect example of Occam's razor from philosophy. "The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation."

Before returning the sweet rod, I have a trip planned to my local machine shop to see if there exists enough material to re-thread to the 3/4-16 (right and left twists)...

Thanks Steve


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
A
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
A Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 473
And NO mechanical force required wave

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,281
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,281
What size is your "sweet rod"?


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 56
I only know it's not 3/4"-16


1948 1/2 Ton 6-volt 216
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
T
Crusty Old Sarge
Crusty Old Sarge
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Just wanted to add a little to this. I bought my tie rod from LMC, when it was delivered there was nothing in the box, the shipping label had the weight on it and everything. The next morning I took the box to UPS, they had a record of delivery so it had to be the shippers fault. I asked to speak to he manager, while the clerk went to get the manager as noticed what she had propped the door open with, my tie rod. Seems they found it on the loading dock, the driver had just taped the box where it had come out. Go figure. dang

Last edited by TUTS 59; 10/24/2019 1:51 AM.

~ Craig
1958 Viking 4400
"The Book of Thor"
Read the story in the DITY
1960 Chevrolet C10
"A Family Heirloom"
Follow the story in the DITY Gallery
'59 Apache 31, 327 V8 (0.030 over), Muncie M20 4 Speed, GM 10 Bolt Rear... long term project (30 years and counting)

If you don't like driving yourTruck, you won't drive yourTruck..| Living life in the SLOW lane

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0