The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (JW51, 49choptop, Patina 54), 210 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,098
Posts1,056,167
Members48,436
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1244048 11/20/2017 3:06 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 30
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 30
I'm looking to get a parts truck for my 1962 C10, however if I'm unable to find a 60-62 C10, then would it be worth it to purchase a 63-66? I know that the 63-66 years have some differences, but I don't know if there would be enough differences to keep me from getting one.


College student trying to restore grandad's 62 C10
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,718
H
Moderator: 60-66 Trucks; North Eastern Bolters
Moderator: 60-66 Trucks; North Eastern Bolters
H Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,718
Depending on parts needed the differences could be significant enough. Check front of lmc catalog for quick reference and then compare year specs from the gmheritage site. Suspension and frame differences. Headlight config and hood obvious. But there are many similarities once you get beyond those areas


~ HB
1966 Chevrolet K-10 | Ghost: formerly Flappy Fenders | In the Stovebolt Gallery
1962 Chevrolet C10
1962 Suburban
Matt Skittles #1244197 11/22/2017 12:47 AM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 53
V
'Bolter
'Bolter
V Offline
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 53
In 1964 the A post leans back instead of forward. Doors and windshield would not interchange.

Rich


Rich

68 C30 CST dually flatbed dump
58 Viking 6500
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 436
6
'Bolter
'Bolter
6 Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 436
i have had both a '63 and a '62 C10. Here are some of my observations.

'62 was the last year for the X-Frame and torsion bar front suspension. So '63-'66 will not swap frame or front suspension. '62 rear end is a 3rd member drop out style. '63-'66 has the more modern style, does not swap internal parts at all, but may swap as a full housing/axle unit.

As stated above, the windshield, cab, and doors are different from '64-'66, but the '63 is still a match to the '62 on that score.

Other body parts, fenders, hood, bed, tailgate, etc.. do swap. Grills and grill surrounds do swap, but the grills are not physically the same as the '62. '60-'63 had single year production on their grills, different for each year. '64-'66 had the same grill for all 3 years, but different from the previous years.

Engines/transmissions can swap, but you need to be careful. If you have the I6 235, you will need to change the bell housing if you go to a later model I6 230/250/292 or a V8. The bolt pattern is different. Also different is the tranny mounts if you have a manual tranny. '62 has 2 mounts on the bell housing that are not there on '63 and later models which use a rear transmission mount.

These are just a few things I can think of off the top of my head.

Basically it boils down to "If you must buy a '63-'66 parts truck, get a '63. It is the best match of the '63-'66 series."

62Stick #1244442 11/24/2017 3:09 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 788
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 788
Originally Posted by 62Stick
i have had both a '63 and a '62 C10. Here are some of my observations.

'62 was the last year for the X-Frame and torsion bar front suspension. So '63-'66 will not swap frame or front suspension. '62 rear end is a 3rd member drop out style. '63-'66 has the more modern style, does not swap internal parts at all, but may swap as a full housing/axle unit.

As stated above, the windshield, cab, and doors are different from '64-'66, but the '63 is still a match to the '62 on that score.

Other body parts, fenders, hood, bed, tailgate, etc.. do swap. Grills and grill surrounds do swap, but the grills are not physically the same as the '62. '60-'63 had single year production on their grills, different for each year. '64-'66 had the same grill for all 3 years, but different from the previous years.

Engines/transmissions can swap, but you need to be careful. If you have the I6 235, you will need to change the bell housing if you go to a later model I6 230/250/292 or a V8. The bolt pattern is different. Also different is the tranny mounts if you have a manual tranny. '62 has 2 mounts on the bell housing that are not there on '63 and later models which use a rear transmission mount.

These are just a few things I can think of off the top of my head.

Basically it boils down to "If you must buy a '63-'66 parts truck, get a '63. It is the best match of the '63-'66 series."
I don't think that rear trans mount was used on manual trans until 68. p/glides used the rear trans mount from 60 -66 and the t400 in 66
ron

62Stick #1244537 11/25/2017 1:06 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 30
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 30
Thanks a ton, that info is really helpful!


College student trying to restore grandad's 62 C10
padresag #1244575 11/25/2017 9:18 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 436
6
'Bolter
'Bolter
6 Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 436
Originally Posted by padresag
I don't think that rear trans mount was used on manual trans until 68. p/glides used the rear trans mount from 60 -66 and the t400 in 66
ron

Thanks for that info, my '63 had the Power Glide from the factory. I later swapped in a TH400, but had to move the rear transmission mount cross member rearward to match the new rear mount location.


Moderated by  Hambone, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0